+1
I like the question, but I think it's a bit more interesting when broken down.
For example, The Room is fascinating, but it's fascinating in ways that exist despite what I'd expect from typical criticism. I could probably ready a bad review of the film, agree that technically the critique is fair, and still enjoy the film.
That category of "badly reviewed films that I like" fall under finding something special in the film despite faults. And there's a lot of sub-categories to that as well (nostalgic films, popcorn films, so-bad-it's-good films, etc). There's a lot of films I like that fall under this category.
But to me, the more interesting question is about films where you think the critical consensus is wrong. That the reviews actually don't stand up for X, Y, Z reasons. That's the one I actually have to think about, because generally speaking one doesn't automatically come to mind, because generally I tend to watch films that are recommended to me and those tend to be well-ish reviewed.
I was going to say The Grey had more depth than I was expecting, but actually that's at 79% on RT, which really isn't that much lower than I'd put it myself. I assumed it got way more panned.
I'll have to think about that. But I am curious if people think of films that they straight up think the critics messed up on.
(I'm betting experimental films come to mind, but those are a bit of low hanging fruit IMO)