Live-action remakes of animated movies... is this getting out of hand?

Tools    





No, it's not.
Novelties are usually one-offs, just think of novelty songs.
The Disney animated films weren't supposed to be remade, so when that happened it felt fresh and unusual. Not anymore.
You're just talking about a different novelty factor than I am



I loved Jon Favreau’s live-action remake of The Jungle Book. And Kenneth Branagh’s remake of Cinderella was OK. I didn’t see the others because I’d heard that they’ve really declined in quality and, like much of what else comes out of Disney and Hollywood, have gone Woke. Personally, I don’t care what Disney does because we’ll always have the animated classics. From what I understand, these live-action remakes have been a virtual mint for Disney, and as long as that’s the case, they’re going to keep cranking them out.

Mark



They're making these remakes because they can, it's the complete opposite of raison d'être

As I've mentioned in another thread, I'm not a fan of these boo-hoo victimy origin stories for villains.
I hardly think of it as a "boo-boo" story and more of a "see what happens when you create your own worst enemy with your own evil" story.



Live action films like Cocteau and Gans (1946 & 2014) versions of Beauty and the Beast are so much better than anything Disney has done.
__________________
Its tougher to be vulnerable than to actually be tough.



Live action films like Cocteau and Gans (1946 & 2014) versions of Beauty and the Beast are so much better than anything Disney has done.
Just to play devil's advocate, tho, do you think the average 6-year-old would enjoy those movies if you take them to watch them at the theater?



Just to play devil's advocate, tho, do you think the average 6-year-old would enjoy those movies if you take them to watch them at the theater?
I don't think a 6 yr old would enjoy a Disney live action of the film. Children are more interest in cartoons. Some don't have the attention span to sit through a hour of anything.



I don't think a 6 yr old would enjoy a Disney live action of the film. Children are more interest in cartoons. Some don't have the attention span to sit through a hour of anything.
Um, an 8 or 10 year old?



“My 8 yr old's movie pick was The Gangs of New York but she was taught at an early age how to watch movies.”

Pretty impressive. I know a lot of adults who wouldn’t be able to get through that movie.
I’m waiting for an 8-year-old (or thereabouts) to tell me their movie pick is Koyaanisqatsi.

Mark



“My 8 yr old's movie pick was The Gangs of New York but she was taught at an early age how to watch movies.”

Pretty impressive. I know a lot of adults who wouldn’t be able to get through that movie.
I’m waiting for an 8-year-old (or thereabouts) to tell me their movie pick is Koyaanisqatsi.

Mark
When we went to the cinema, we just didn't see what I wanted. My children were allowed to pick films and Gangs of New York was her pick. She was the only child in the theatre. Again she was taught at home to watch a film. If she got up to go play , the movie was shut off. She was 2 & 3 yrs old watching the re release of the 3 original Star Wars films at the cinema.



Just to play devil's advocate, tho, do you think the average 6-year-old would enjoy those movies if you take them to watch them at the theater?
If you're going to approach it from a child's point of view then it kinda changes the topic of discussion, doesn't it.
And then the question should be: "live-action remakes of animated movies...do you think children think it's getting out of hand?"



If you're going to approach it from a child's point of view then it kinda changes the topic of discussion, doesn't it.

This is the first time I've ever made another user's post my sig.



If you have a long literary memory, you realize that, since there really are only about 10 unique plot lines in the world, it's not a surprise that most movies are remakes of something. Movies are just arriving at the point that books did a century ago. "Remakes" are nothing new; they are inevitable, although you do need to put something new into it. It's live action now, 3D years ago, etc.
This isn't about remakes in general. The question is plainly more granular than that.



The Guy Who Sees Movies
So, it used to be that Disney used to have a near-monopoly on the practice of making live-action remakes of its animated classics.

That's about to change in a big way this summer, when Dreamworks debuts the live-action remake of How to Train a Dragon...


.
A new movie, using an old plot and characters, is completely new to an 8 year old. Add in some licensing and negotiations, along with the possibility of lots of money and it's a "NEW" movie. Most kids have seen lots of old Disney movies, so you have to add a new element.



A new movie, using an old plot and characters, is completely new to an 8 year old. Add in some licensing and negotiations, along with the possibility of lots of money and it's a "NEW" movie. Most kids have seen lots of old Disney movies, so you have to add a new element.
This in no way addresses the thing you quoted, which is specifically about the fact that a non-Disney studio is doing this now.

Please read the posts before responding. And if you want to respond generally, don't quote a specific post, because doing that implies you'll be speaking to the thing you're quoting in some way.