Elaborating on the "coincidence" thing, compare reality to other things that could have happened: it's supposedly a coincidence that he died "just before the film was released." But that's no more suspicious than at any other point. Observe:
Kubrick dies just after the film, which exposes a sex cult, is released. Coincidence?
Kubrick dies while filming his expose of sex cults. Coincidence?
Kubrick dies while in pre-production for his film about sex cults. Coincidence?
Kubrick dies while securing financing for his film about sex cults. Coincidence?
Kubrick dies while writing the screenplay for his film about sex cults. Coincidence?
And so on. So you could imply that his death was suspicious if it took place any time shortly after, during, or before any part of the production process, a production process which was especially long, too, since the film took an incredible 15 months to shoot. And that's without even getting into the fact that Kubrick began some form of development as early as 1968.
On top of that, there's the larger issue with only finding coincidences in retrospect. At any given moment all sorts of people are making films about controversial subjects that could potentially represent some threat to the powerful or well-connected, so it's meaningless to take them in total, see who died or who didn't, and then imply a conspiracy in retrospect. That's just not how probability works.
Kubrick dies just after the film, which exposes a sex cult, is released. Coincidence?
Kubrick dies while filming his expose of sex cults. Coincidence?
Kubrick dies while in pre-production for his film about sex cults. Coincidence?
Kubrick dies while securing financing for his film about sex cults. Coincidence?
Kubrick dies while writing the screenplay for his film about sex cults. Coincidence?
And so on. So you could imply that his death was suspicious if it took place any time shortly after, during, or before any part of the production process, a production process which was especially long, too, since the film took an incredible 15 months to shoot. And that's without even getting into the fact that Kubrick began some form of development as early as 1968.
On top of that, there's the larger issue with only finding coincidences in retrospect. At any given moment all sorts of people are making films about controversial subjects that could potentially represent some threat to the powerful or well-connected, so it's meaningless to take them in total, see who died or who didn't, and then imply a conspiracy in retrospect. That's just not how probability works.