Movies you couldn't even finish.

Tools    





There is something to be said for humbling one self by watching things that don't immediately entertain or enlighten. Instead of constantly just glutting out on what we already know we will like. To me, only watching things I love sounds like an absolute bore.
I don’t have time for “humbling myself” & life is too stressful for such a thing. I need to lose myself in a movie & I can’t wait 2 hours for this to happen.
__________________
I’m here only on Mondays, Wednesdays & Fridays. That’s why I’m here now.



I don’t have time for “humbling myself” & life is too stressful for such a thing. I need to lose myself in a movie & I can’t wait 2 hours for this to happen.
He stated that he didn't understand why someone would do this. I explained why someone would. Why it can make a difference in how one thinks about a film.


Watch movies however you like.



More like hell, no, I am out of here!

Yeah, it was kind of messy, conceptually. Peele is creative, but sometimes a little to clever for his own good.



I think the film that he should have made was the bit about the chimpanzee.



Yeah, it was kind of messy, conceptually. Peele is creative, but sometimes a little to clever for his own good.



I think the film that he should have made was the bit about the chimpanzee.
Jordan Peele is no Rod Serling.

Maybe he should try making a buddy movie about two guys traveling across the country & get into all kinds of zany situations (...and maybe they have a chimp with them). Maybe have it star Key & Peele?

I personally wouldn't go see it... but then again, I don't personally go see anything.



Babes in Toyland (1961)

A family musical from Disney, not my favorite thing to begin with, but the bizarre visuals were something I wanted to see. When it got to about 20 minutes in it became a movie about human trafficking and I am not interested in telling people about whether or not Disney made the selling of people entertaining or not.



Sometimes it takes a while to understand what a film is attempting to do. We have to adjust to its speed or tone or eccentricities before we can appreciate it. Otherwise, our tastes remain stagnant and boring if we don't challenge them. Some people are fine with this, and good for them, but I'm not. Films deserve more than that.




I would claim that at least half of the movies I would consider the best of all time, I initially hated or couldn't get into or was confused by in the first hour. But by sticking with it, they paid off. There is something to be said for humbling one self by watching things that don't immediately entertain or enlighten. Instead of constantly just glutting out on what we already know we will like. To me, only watching things I love sounds like an absolute bore.


And, FTR, even in instances when a film doesn't pay off and you still hate it, there is lots to learn from what one doesn't like. We understand the things we do like better by watching things we find to be terrible. It's what builds critical thinking (I know, I know, who cares about that these days)


In short, it's called curiosity and being inquisitive about the things we like. If one is a fan of films, it isn't hard to understand why one isn't always just looking for immediate gratification and might want to stray into unfamiliar waters. It pays off in the end.
I'm not a very political person, but the Reefer Madness film appears to be made to make reefer unappealing and geared towards the college demographic of the time. I totally sense that early 2000s college vibe/mindset. Like, say you were 20 and said "hey, I'm going to get this movie and watch it with my friends, we'll smoke a bowl and have a good time." Then everyone gets more uncomfortable as the movie progresses. It was like the man is teaching you a lesson or something. You thought you were home free but the man had control the whole time and hes watching you smoke it up. It was a trick.





Atrocious movie. Did something I almost never do & threw it out. Twice I’ve tried to get into this movie & it’s impossible. Even Christie couldn’t save it.



I don't actually wear pants.
There's a Holocaust documentary that I tried watching a few months ago but it was too depressing to keep going. I don't know how they managed to make it that much more depressing than a lot of other Holocaust documentaries. I don't know why but I struggle with that subject. I can't even watch Schindler's List again... It's too depressing...
__________________
I destroyed the dastardly dairy dame! I made mad milk maid mulch!



Boyhood.... one of the few where I walked out of the theater



Movie Forums Extra
I also just recently waked out of Envy. I paid 10 bucks for about 20 minutes of bad bad film.



MonteCristo's Avatar
Registered User
Off the top of my head, Righteous Kill. Horribly structured, lame MTV video style rapid-fire editing. DeNiro and Pacino both look tired and bored, no clue what was going on or why I should care. Lasted about 30 minutes.



Off the top of my head, Righteous Kill. Horribly structured, lame MTV video style rapid-fire editing. DeNiro and Pacino both look tired and bored, no clue what was going on or why I should care. Lasted about 30 minutes.
Never saw it. Couldn't help but think that studios realized too late that they should have paired up these two more often. But they were too old for their roles in this one.





Excruciatingly bad.
Western Guilt: The Movie
AKA
"The Trouble with Tribolites"


As one reviewer praised:
“The Forgiven” is a story that urges us to get a perspective. It makes us realize how entitled and privileged we are and how we take all of it for granted. Sitting comfortably on our couches, commenting on our nation’s foreign policies, and being obsessed and selfish about our own trivial struggles, we forget to be grateful for whatever life has given us. We forget to be empathetic towards those for whom the things we take for granted are also a privilege.
Apparently Westerners are also demon fossil thingees.


From the film,
I have no idea why you people have such a thirst for these stupid rocks. What do you see in them? All we know is that you want them and are prepared to pay money for them. Some of us believe... that these are the most evil creatures that ever existed... that they are the forms of dead demons. That is what they look like, you must admit. They must have an influence on our minds. An influence that is evil. And that's what attracts you to them.
Ray Fiennes explains that this character is basically correct.
“A lot of the reviews got caught up in how unlikable Jo and David were,” says Fiennes, over the phone. “Therefore: why should we waste our time with these people? That seems quite a simplistic reaction. I think John is making quite a moral film.

“He pushes all the offensive comments, yes. The disparaging, contemptuous attitude wasn’t compromised on, which I liked. But he’s not interested in celebrating; he’s pointing the finger. Some of the responses didn’t seem to be tuned in to the moral journey. Got a bit sidetracked by the louche behaviour.”
It's not that the film is reductive, but rather that it is courageous. It's just holding up a mirror to how bad you are. Now look! Gaze in the mirror!

Or, rather, just imagine that the characters from Succession showed up in a pious Muslim country and louted things up after killing a child. That's basically it.





The movies here that I finished were The Monitors, Hollow Man, Moulin Rouge, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, Arrival and Get Him to the Greek (with lots of skipping), but the rest of these I could not finish. None of these movies would I like to try seeing again.

* The opinions here are my own and do not reflect the opinions of the other users and operators of this message board.