Oh okay, but that's what I was saying is the problem then. If they change it permanently, isn't that wrong? For example, back in the 90s, on TV, I remember they changed The Big Lebowksi, so that John Goodman says "This is what happens when you find a stranger in the alps", but on physical media, you can still get the original dialogue, unchanged. So if they were to only release the TV edited version of the movie on physical media from now on, wouldn't that be wrong? Isn't that what Disney plus would be doing if they went forward with changing the physical media as well?
A film being edited for profanity because it's being broadcasted on a cable television network backed by advertisers and subject to stricter FCC regulations, is
not the same as a studio retro-actively editing film content it deems too risquι for it's own brand and in-house, subscription based streaming service.
A film's edited-for-TV version becoming the only available option on home media is absolutely improbable outside of the only surviving copy of the film being a TV recording of it. (And it'd have to be a pretty important film or guaranteed profit-making title to be considered as okay for release it in its televised state.)
Even a film having its edited-for-TV version released on home media
alongside the original edit is extremely rare, because there's not a big enough profit gain for major studios to do the work in pressing two separate copies of a film to sell when one of those copies consists of something generally ignored outside of the hyper-conscious family and Christian markets. There's literally an a whole aftermarket business built around the niche demographic of people who want to own the TV-edits of movies (of which I'm sure religion plays a majority role) but can't buy them because they're never officially released on home media e.g., companies like Clear Play, Family Flix, and Clean Films. (The Bush administration actually passed a bill that protected some of these companies from movie studios/rights holders filing lawsuits.)
On the other hand, Disney and their age-old retro-censoring (seriously this is nothing new and they've been doing this for decades) is an entirely different thing. Disney re-edits their media whether it's their own production or something they've bought the rights for to maintain their company's reputed public image, which is just corporate slang for "we want to make sure people don't find a reason to stop giving us their money".*
Other Hollywood studios don't have a singular public face that's understood in the minds of consumers. So when Disney edits out nudity in
Splash for their streaming service and all future physical releases of that film, there's no reason whatsoever to replace "Disney" with "Hollywood" and start making sweeping predictions like all the industry's studios (especially any of the other majors) will follow suit. And like I said above, Disney has been doing this for many many years, so if other giants in Hollywood were going to emulate it then it would have happened a while ago, and probably be close to normalization at this point.