A Double Standard?

Cite your sources, this seems like a strawman arguement

or do all black protestors just look alike to you

ashdoc can I lend you my shield? Perhaps I'm reading too much into ash_is_the_gal post, but it might be a veiled comment addressing India's cast system. You are most likely more qualified than me to address that

oh, CNN, Fox, RT just to mention a few
I do find that often those that are at a loss of their own words resort to questioning others as to source

or you could have just asked me

__________________
letterboxd

Which same people?

__________________
Farewell and adieu to you fair Spanish ladies...

Yeah, the moment you get to "well I'll bet it's the same people who..." it's probably stopped being a serious discussion.

Granted, there are many, many issues on which someone's position can clue you in, with great accuracy, to their likely position on many other issues, but even then it should be framed as a contingent argument, and in this case I actually think there's probably not a ton of overlap.

Cite your sources, those are reports of the protest you need to provide citation that the people who defend kneeling are also protesting the Nazi speech.

Though if I were to defend it I would say holding universities accountable for inviting Nazi's doesn't seem to be hypocritical to me. You and your ilk are free to buy tickets to NFL games and then protest the protesters.

I don't find this, personally. But I do find that not sourcing things properly is often a sign of rampant confirmation bias and/or misremembered facts.

It was my understanding that the First Amendment means that the government itself cannot suppress the citizens' right to free speech, whereas citizens opposing each other's forms of self-expression is fair game.

If anything, the real irony is that the guy preaching hatred is counting on presenting himself as calm and civilised so that centrist/apathetic types will think of him as a reasonable individual who is being unfairly targeted to the (understandably) angry protestors who damage property and punch out-and-proud white supremacists (this is the same playbook that Milo Yiannopoulos ran last year). Trying to draw superficial comparisons between BLM and the KKK because they're both "anti-government" or whatever is missing the forest for the trees.

__________________
Iro's Top 100 Movies v3.0

oh you know those people

Are those people the same as them?

" you and your ilk " - didn't Yoda just admonish us to refrain from such talk?
Let's face it, we all know what we are talking about here but using some words just to distort meaning is a kind of a cheap shot. Kind of like Clinton saying " a bj is not sex " .
Are you going to tell me that Black Lives Matter did not defend kneeling, while at the same time bashing Nazi speech?
Sources? I don't need my mind to go dig for quotes and pictures just to confirm what every body that watches news knows about. And yeah, I don't watch just one channel and will even watch MSNBC just to get that feeling of dazed and confused.

Ok Ash, what exactly is your point?

I also hear their are some good ones, some even are their best friends are those people

I hardly find that using violence as an end to justify the cause is missing the forest for the trees. It's all like right out of Lenin's playbook. Heard of him?
There are other ways to deal wit issues. Acceptable ways. Destruction of property and beating up and killing people are certainly not acceptable.
You don't like the speaker or what he stands for, just ignore him. Don't show up and have him talk to an empty room. That is acceptable.
The more violence you use and the louder you protest, the more attention he gets. Why can't you just choose the Gandhi way?

the video has poor sound quality and i can't understand what he is saying .

is it about the spelling mistake i made ? i should have written THEIR instead of THERE .

'THEIR own place in society' .

no. lol. it was a dumb, harmless joke. nvr mind.

And protesting his intolerant speech is also an acceptable form of speech. There is no one right way.

And that's the point, when the protest becomes other than speech, it is unacceptable.
I don't mind the protest. Protest all you want ( except from protesting symbols of unity ) but don't hurt people and destroy property during your protest.
Looking back at history, if it wasn't for the endless street brawls between the brown shorts and communists, a failed artist would have never got the opportunity to be heard. As the violence escalated, so did his audience.