Which of these is the greatest sci-fi film?

Tools    


Best of the sci-fi genre
2.94%
1 votes
Alphaville 1965
38.24%
13 votes
2001 A Space Odyssey 1968
29.41%
10 votes
Alien 1979
29.41%
10 votes
Blade Runner 1982
0%
0 votes
The Andromeda Strain 1971
34 votes. You may not vote on this poll




Welcome to the human race...
2001 in a walk. you don't get alien or blade runner without it. i like alphaville but it seems comparatively insular.
__________________
I really just want you all angry and confused the whole time.
Iro's Top 100 Movies v3.0



I don't find watching the whole film to be an enjoyable exercise.
Watching it in a theater with a live orchestra is absolutely a mind-blowing experience.



Victim of The Night
I am increasingly loving Alphaville.
Unlike almost any other film, the more times I watch it the more I appreciate it as a work of genius and masterpiece.
I think it is Godard's greatest work.
I really liked Alphaville a lot and initially thought I'd go that direction until I saw what else was on the poll.



Victim of The Night

Alphaville 1965...A cool French new wave film. Not much in hard sci-fi but big on societal commentary which was relevant to what was going on in the world and in French politics at the time. There are many unconventional story telling methods used to further the narrative, coupled with some really innovative camera work like the direct edit 'I came to give you a light'. I don't know how much Alphaville influenced other film makers, some of course, but I'd say the other three sci fi films you listed had more influence on future sci fi films. Though the filming style of Godard did influence future films.

Blade Runner 1982...I might be bias in my opinion of Blade Runner but I'd say this one is the winner in regards to "directorial imagination, innovation and influence, as well as its insightfulness into the future and any comment it makes on humanity/society"...Ridley really shines with his world building/set design skills. If I remember correctly Ridley started out as a set designer. Blade Runner takes alot of the real world and stretches it into a believable future that's not so rosy. It makes one helluva a comment on how society treats people viewed as 'less important'. Oh.. Deckard was a human, not a replicant.
Amusingly, to me at least, when I wrote my review of Alphaville a year or two ago one of my biggest takeaways was how influential it must have been on Scott's Blade Runner. How it seemed like Blade Runner before Blade Runner.



Victim of The Night
Gosh, this can go in dozens of directions. All fine movies, and favorites, but nothing past 1982?...
Setting aside obvious box-office favorites (Star Wars, Matrix, various Spielberg joints, Terminator (just 1 and 2 for me), etc.). How about Inception, Children of Men, District 9, Brazil, Primer, Ex Machina, Arrival, Moon, Her ... OK, you get the point. This is kind of the "old fart's like me" (yes, like me) list.

The schlocky one I'd absolutely include as a personal favorite: Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.
Honestly, while I like almost all of those films a lot I wouldn't put any of them up against the better four in that poll (I like The Andromeda Strain too but it's not in that pantheon).
The best of those you listed, Children Of Men and Brazil, are great films but still would get knocked off instantly by the top four in this poll. The others don't have the wattage to light the bathroom in 2001 or Blade Runner's guest house.
So I don't feel like this is old fart's list rather that some very good Sci-Fi has been made since 1982 but, other than The Matrix, I don't think there's been much god-tier stuff.



Victim of The Night
Clearly the only correct answer is "none of the above"

The obvious answer is Fritz Lang's Metropolis
Honestly, if I'd made the poll, Metropolis would be where Andromeda Strain is and I'd have had a much harder time voting.



Trouble with a capital "T"
Amusingly, to me at least, when I wrote my review of Alphaville a year or two ago one of my biggest takeaways was how influential it must have been on Scott's Blade Runner. How it seemed like Blade Runner before Blade Runner.
That's interesting, I'll have to rewatch Alphaville someday with that in mind. I wasn't that focused the one time I watched Alphaville so I might have missed alot.



Trouble with a capital "T"
If we're talking about most influential sci-fi films we gotta include these:

Forbidden Planet (1956) not only highly influential to future sci-fi flicks, it literately is 'proto-Star Trek'.

Plant of the Apes (1968) one of the most iconic sci-fi films that helped popularized conceptional ideas sci-fi.



A discussion of sci-fi cinema cannot be complete without mentioning Georges Méliès's Le voyage dans la lune (1902) - many people have seen just clips of it, but you gotta watch the whole thing to really grasp its significance....



Gosh, this can go in dozens of directions. All fine movies, and favorites, but nothing past 1982? (But for me that "newbie" in the list, Blade Runner, is far and away the best. I'd go for the original theater version, as I love the noir-ish narration. Though I won't fight you that the forced ending was done better in later versions.)

Setting aside obvious box-office favorites (Star Wars, Matrix, various Spielberg joints, Terminator (just 1 and 2 for me), etc.). How about Inception, Children of Men, District 9, Brazil, Primer, Ex Machina, Arrival, Moon, Her ... OK, you get the point. This is kind of the "old fart's like me" (yes, like me) list.

The schlocky one I'd absolutely include as a personal favorite: Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.
Arrival and Terminator in particular are good shouts.
For clarity though - whilst I do think the ones I've listed probably include the best of the genre - it was just the best of the 5 I was asking about, from that period 1965-1982 which I think was a key development period for sci-fi films.
I did miss New Hope out in fairness, although I don't know whether it would have troubled the scorers. I think that one has a terrific first half then it becomes a load of nonsense personally, and I'm not sure it's particularly deep.



The Guy Who Sees Movies
2001 seems to be leading the vote, but for me, it was way too NASA-dry and procedural. The climactic, psychedelic ending seemed tacked on for visual interest, but whatever content it held was lost on me as well as most people I know that have seen it

Blade Runner, with it's noir-sci-fi fantasy is an all time favorite. I have not seen Alphaville, and Andromeda is another one that's too dry for my taste.

It makes me realize that I guess I don't see that era being all that good for sci-fi movies. If you really want to put a wild, wild card in there that's not in the list, it would be that Soviet era movie Stalker. Tarkovsky went seriously off the rails on that one.




Victim of The Night
A discussion of sci-fi cinema cannot be complete without mentioning Georges Méliès's Le voyage dans la lune (1902) - many people have seen just clips of it, but you gotta watch the whole thing to really grasp its significance....
I agree with you, of course. That's a movie that, until you've seen it, you don't really realize and you think it's just one of those things cinephiles talk about. Now that I've watched it four or five times and showed it to other people in my house, I think that it deserves every word of praise its ever gotten from regular viewers, critics, and even filmmakers like Scorsese.



2001 seems to be leading the vote, but for me, it was way too NASA-dry and procedural. The climactic, psychedelic ending seemed tacked on for visual interest, but whatever content it held was lost on me as well as most people I know that have seen it
2001 is a deeply philosophical movie. Maybe people had an easier time grasping that in the 1960s, I don't know. But you can immerse yourself in it and spend all of its running time thinking about all the movie is saying about humanity and the human mind.

From that perspective, every single second of its running time is fascinating, imho



The Guy Who Sees Movies
2001 is a deeply philosophical movie. Maybe people had an easier time grasping that in the 1960s, I don't know. But you can immerse yourself in it and spend all of its running time thinking about all the movie is saying about humanity and the human mind.

From that perspective, every single second of its running time is fascinating, imho
I have to admit that I understood the philosophy, some post-Nietzschean fantasy, but it was lost on me and moved way too slow.



I have to admit that I understood the philosophy, some post-Nietzschean fantasy, but it was lost on me and moved way too slow.
Can what 2001 has to offer truly be "lost" on anyone? I'm not sure. I think to a large extent it is a large canvas that leaves a lot open to each person's interpretation.

The last time I watched it, I was fortunate enough to attend the 70mm IMAX engagements that were set up for the anniversary or something, I made sure to catch it like 3 times, and each and every one of the screenings was a profound, inspiring and deeply moving experience.

Not sure that experience can be duplicated when you watch at home. It is almost like feeling that cinema has regressed so much artistically in the last 50+ years...

But of course, YMMV! Everyone perceives the world differently!



Can what 2001
The last time I watched it, I was fortunate enough to attend the 70mm IMAX engagements that were set up for the anniversary or something
I can imagine that being pretty special.