Jinn's 100 Films of the 2010s

Tools    





78. The Ghost Writer (2010, dir. Roman Polanski)





The better conspiracy films make the allure of the "inside" very attractive, and not simply for obvious gratification. What's intriguing here is the question of whether a conspiracy is worth exposing, which you may not know until it definitely is and now you're complicit. This film isn't a nailbiter or a shoe-stomper, but it is a charming/not-so-charming reminder that we (as McGregor's writer is our surrogate) don't really know what we don't know, but we do know that someone doesn't want us to know it. The final shot is a doozy.



77. Shame (2011, dir. Steve McQueen)





I might be more inclined towards the intersections of sexuality and psychological dysfunction than some viewers. It's not the most exciting type of film, and certainly not the most erotic. They neither turn me on or bleak me out, but the ones that can navigate the cracks of the facade to show real human reflection are the ones that might offer some balance between intimacy and performance.



76. The Wolf of Wall Street (2013, dir. Martin Scorsese)





And this is so shameful. An undeniably electric flick with piss and vinegar that's also a testament to the most obnoxiously exploitative tendencies we can collectively muster as a quote-unquote culture. It's here on my list. Great f#cking movie. I'm a little sick of it by now as it has defined our current Trump appropriation. I'd rather stick that pen in Jordan's neck like Pesci in Casino. I wish people had seen this as a warning.



75. A Ghost Story (2017, dir. David Lowery)





It's the story about a house, basically. But it's really about space, specific spaces. Existential, not horrible. The film glides through time much as one walks through a home. I admire the brass. The commitment. The only part that didn't work for me was the overly verbal segment with Will Oldham which is just the kind of hipster drain this film should have avoided.



74. Shutter Island (2010, dir. Martin Scorsese)





(caveat: in B&W)


I thought that this thriller was pretty good on release, but I'm terminally committed to watching it in monochrome, as this provides the preferable splendor for my own private screenings. I'm not mad.

It's a mobius aesthetic that connects the pole between the B-movie matinee and late night television.



I really, really liked A Ghost Story. Quite a lot, actually.

Shutter Island, like most Scorsese, really missed the mark with me. Meh.
__________________
Check out my podcast: The Movie Loot!



79. The Death of Stalin (2017, dir. Armando Iannucci)





I've heard some complaints, most notably from those who suffered under the Curtain, about the possible sweetening of horrific history by essentially turning these monsters into muppets, which is about what they amount to here. I don't see, really, how this makes any of these horrible men any more lovable, rather just stooges that are prime for mocking. That's my take anyway, and I found this film to be hilarious and I would never want to meet a one of them. Buscemi's Khrushchev stands out to me as an especially giddy worm.

A brilliant comedy. One of the best of the decade.



The film. Here's what I wrote about it back in the day:
Hereditary  
Totally agreed; for all of Aster's auterist pretensions with, Hereditary really did often feel like the work of a Horror hack in the end, if you ask me.
I liked it a bit more than you did. I thought the atmosphere was fine. But the plot inconsistencies, or how the "scenes don't fit together", really become accentuated on repeat viewings. I think that both of Aster's films have major issues with how he develops his stories, characters, etc.
Don't forget the painfully obvious telegraphing:
WARNING: spoilers below
hey, the conspicuously friendly supporting character who randomly approached the protagonist earlier happens to have a welcome mat that looks her dead mother's? GEE, I WONDER WHERE THIS IS LEADING.






Since you mention it, I'll point out that at the time of Basterds' release, there were some Jewish groups, mostly older and actual survivors and whatnot, who were not very flattered by the scene where they torture a German soldier. It's one thing to show Jews taking revenge on Hitler, but torturing a Nazi actually places them morally on par with the Nazis, and it either ignores or insults the post-war legacy of human rights commitment, the Geneva Convention for example, that many Jewish survivors spearheaded. I doubt that Tarantino has the maturity to discern the difference, and, being a rich white American safely ensconced in the comforts of fantasy violence, I'm sure he sees no reason why he should.
Absolutely, and while some people might defend the larger revenge fantasy of Basterds by pointing out how Holocaust survivors have said that watching it did more for them than years of therapy did (a response I'm not criticizing in the slightest, for the record), I think assuming that kind of catharsis was Tarantino's main intention (or even just his partial) with that film would be giving him way too much credit, given his track record. And, even if it was, it still doesn't rectify the fundamental hollowness of the experience, at least not for me.



Victim of The Night
94. A Dangerous Method (2011, dir. David Cronenberg)





This film may be a little underrated for the fact that it's soaked in psychosexual theory and yet maintains a disturbingly sober and clinical distance to the subject throughout. It may be too much to expect an emotional reptile like Cronenberg to manage a, let's say Two Moon Junction for example?, but some may have anticipated something more weird, wild or unhinged, ala Dead Ringers or Crash. Instead, Cronenberg keeps a tight leash on the proceedings, allowing the ideas, of the tension between ethics and eros, to supply the teeth (as Cassel's Otto Gross demonstrates), and the actors, all of whom are superb (definitely including Knightley, you haters), to supply the subtle steam of repression. It probably helps to be interested in both the subject matter and respective writings of the figures presented.
My two friends (husband and wife) and I saw this in the theater and have never been able to understand why more people don't appreciate this film. We, all three, thought it was on par with at least the better half of Cronenberg's work.



Victim of The Night
85. Snowpiercer (2013, dir. Bong Joon-ho)





Not the most sophisticated dystopian social allegory ever conceived, this is still filled with enough verve and imagination to make it a highlight.
You could not have put that much better.



Victim of The Night
80. Beyond The Black Rainbow (2010, dir. Panos Cosmatos)





As I said with Mandy, Panos Cosmatos is a richly evocative filmmaker with a heart of bile. This film, his debut, is visually stunning, from the opulent colors to the geometric compositions to the vintage stock grain. As Cosmatos has said, he intended to create the perfect 1983 videocassette that he wasn't allowed to watch at that age. But this is no nostalgic funfest, but a psychotechno nightmare that makes the viewer worse for the wear in how it oozes into focus. Be careful with the potency here.
Damn. If this movie is better than Mandy, then I'm not going to see Mandy.
For all the wonderful visual and sonic flare of this movie it was still narratively poor enough that I probably will never watch it again, at least not in its entirety. I was deeply disappointed, deeply.



Victim of The Night
77. Shame (2011, dir. Steve McQueen)





I might be more inclined towards the intersections of sexuality and psychological dysfunction than some viewers. It's not the most exciting type of film, and certainly not the most erotic. They neither turn me on or bleak me out, but the ones that can navigate the cracks of the facade to show real human reflection are the ones that might offer some balance between intimacy and performance.
I was really excited for this film based on the previews and the cast. I thought it was very good but fell a bit short of its mark.



Damn. If this movie is better than Mandy, then I'm not going to see Mandy.
For all the wonderful visual and sonic flare of this movie it was still narratively poor enough that I probably will never watch it again, at least not in its entirety. I was deeply disappointed, deeply.
I mostly agree with Rock's take (if I'm understanding him correctly):

Originally Posted by Rock
I wanted to like Mandy more, but it felt a little too obviously catered to things I'm supposed to like. A strange complaint to have, probably, but I like my movies a little less obviously designed.
I felt like it was a bit too calculated, for lack of a better word. On paper "Nic Cage heavy metal revenge flick" pretty much sells itself, but the finished product didn't make much of an impression on me. It was like Elevator Pitch: The Movie. I was onto their game as soon as I saw the trailer with the "it's...crazy...EVIL!" line. "Come watch Cage Cage the bleep out!"
(and I didn't even hate it, by the way)

Black Rainbow is undoubtedly a mess and I'd be lying if I said I remembered what it was about but watching a director aim high and fail is more interesting to me.

As long as Jinn doesn't screw up and rank Colour Out of Space above both of these I'll be ok.
__________________
Captain's Log
My Collection



79. The Death of Stalin (2017, dir. Armando Iannucci)





I've heard some complaints, most notably from those who suffered under the Curtain, about the possible sweetening of horrific history by essentially turning these monsters into muppets, which is about what they amount to here. I don't see, really, how this makes any of these horrible men any more lovable, rather just stooges that are prime for mocking. That's my take anyway, and I found this film to be hilarious and I would never want to meet a one of them. Buscemi's Khrushchev stands out to me as an especially giddy worm.

I love this movie so much. I recently registered for a short story contest and when I was designated to have to write 'political satire' (and having zero idea how to do that) this was what I turned to for guidance. What I learned from it was that for satire to really bite, it needs to graciously toe the line between condemning what is on screen and playing along with it. Those Muppet-esque performances may seem to soften their evil doings at first glance, but this ultimately only deepens the horror and absurdity of their actions, thus exposing the machine that allows these sorts of personalities to both fester and thrive.



As a result, I have no doubt the story I submitted will be considered as being pro-facism and immediately disqualified, even though all I wanted to do was write an allegory about my cats.