Originally Posted by Iroquois
Things don't always have to be the way that they used to be. Also, SC is a guy.
Originally Posted by Iroquois
A, "transgender" and "cisgender" are not supposed to be actual genders like "male" or "female", they are supposed to indicate the connection between a person's biological sex and their gender identity. Transgender indicates a person whose sex and gender are different, cisgender is when they are both the same. B, panromantic isn't a gender either - if anything, it's more of a sexual orientation. C...
Originally Posted by Iroquois
If your response to a person telling you about an unfamiliar concept is to immediately cut the other person off and vehemently deny the concept's existence, then it does make you seem ignorant and narrow-minded. I mean, Googling "two spirit" just now tells me that it's a thing that exists and, not being a Native American myself (never mind the username), am I really in a position to question whether or not such a concept truly exists?
Originally Posted by Iroquois
Even if you're being hyperbolic, that's still a very extreme reaction to some decidedly innocuous statements. How are you so sure that that's "not how life works" anyway?
My general position now is that this movement to redefine gender is the result of the LGB civil rights activists letting the snowball get away from them. It's not about sexuality anymore, it's about gender.
I'm all for less segregation between men and women, but the bathroom debate should start there: at sexism. Not at some guy who fancies himself a woman or something equally ridiculous like transableists.