Rate The Last Movie You Saw

Tools    







The Man Who Laughs (1928)
Directed by Paul Leni
Starring: Mary Philbin, Conrad Veidt, Brandon Hurst, Olga Baclanova

Have been wanting to see this for ages. Did not disappoint. Way more in it than I was expecting. Not being familiar with Victor Hugo's original story before, I found a lot of it to be very moving and engaging. Many beautiful sentiments and interesting characters throughout. And a lot of the fine and imaginative art generally unique to those silent pictures, particularly related to German expressionism, with a lot of subsequent influence. A true classic film.

10/10
gosh he looks like the joker



gosh he looks like the joker
Absolutely, spot on observation. The joker's image was directly influenced from this.



gosh he looks like the joker
Actually the original Joker from the 1940s comic was based on him.


EDIT: @James D. Gardiner beat me by a couple of seconds
__________________
Check out my podcast: The Movie Loot!





The Wages of Fear, 1953

In a small town in South America, the entire financial ecosystem revolves around a huge oil company, the SOC. When the company needs to transport a large amount of nitroglycerin, it is determined that the job is actually too dangerous for any of the SOC employees. One of the company's leaders recruits drivers from the local men. Ultimately two trucks leave the town, one driven by Luigi (Folco Lulli) and Bimba (Peter van Eyck), the other driven by Mario (Yves Montand) and Jo (Charles Vanel). Along their journey the men run into one horrifying obstacle after another, while their highly volatile cargo clatters around in the truck beds.

This is one of those weird cases where a movie's reputation has been built up so much that finding it to be "really good" instead of "great" feels like a let down.

The film takes its time with the opening half hour, really establishing the dynamics of the town and setting up some relationships between the men who will ultimately drive the trucks. Mario gets a fair chunk of the attention--he's the young hotshot who doesn't appreciate his devoted girlfriend, Linda (Vera Clouzot) enough. We also see the way that some of the townspeople speak out about the behavior of the company, but no one is really willing to challenge their authority. One of the keenly observed dynamics of the film--and one that can almost get lost in the intensity of the last hour--is the way that the company's financial leverage allows them to buy the lives of these people.

In terms of performances, the four leads all do a good job. The tense, fragile relationship between Mario and Jo is particularly good. They care for each other, but they also want that money. There are many moments in the film where the drivers are forced to choose between the well-being of their partners or the success of the mission, and it is in those moments that the film gets its best tension.

What kept me from finding this to be a five-star film ultimately came down to a sort of emotional fatigue. The film is about 2 1/2 hours long. And about 15 or so minutes before the really heavy stuff begins happening (trying to stay vague here), I had just sort of run out of "edge of my seat" stamina. Bad, intense things just kept happening. At times it began to feel like dark comedy. And being worn out for the last act ultimately meant that some of the most powerful moments in the film landed as I was becoming numb to the horror of it all. I also felt that in the end of the film, the
WARNING: spoilers below
reckless driving off of the cliff felt like a bit too much
.

I did love the way that the film was shot. Certain scenes chose really interesting angles. And because of the nature of the danger of the drive, the landscape almost becomes an antagonist. Any stray potholes, rocks, branches become potential killers. With the hostile landscape on the outside and the interpersonal conflicts on the inside, nowhere feels safe.

Really solid, really stylish. And, annoyingly, despite my complaint being that the film was too long, there's nothing that I felt could really be trimmed or abbreviated. This is a case where watching the film in three sittings might have been a better way to go.




Crouching Tiger remains my first and favorite Wuxia film. It’s rare that the most popular entry in a genre would be most clearly my favorite and for so long, but it has. My exploration of HK cinema only further solidified it.

The brilliance of the film relies on Lee's ability to generate nostalgia and romance for a China that only existed in the Peking Opera and Wuxia films. He's gone on the record about how the musical Love Eterne and Come Drink With Me were the most dominant films on his mind when making it and their influence comes through clearly both on that film but also how they molded his mind creatively into his hyper focus on societal repression (felt everywhere throughout from Hulk to Brokeback).

Couple that with Yuen Wo Ping's choreography, which is the greatest despite my particular love for Lau Kar Leung, and it's just a profound masterpiece.

So on that note, you need to check Come Drink With Me and its sequel Golden Swallow out immediately.

As for Touch of Zen, it's my huge blindspots (as are a couple other King Hu movies and Red Cliff). Essentially, martial arts movies are a comfort food for me and part of that, it their easily digestible short run times. ToZ and the others run at 3 hours minimum and that just makes them a perpetual "I'll get to it eventually."

I even bought the Criterion the day it dropped and still haven't popped it on.

Maybe this conversation will trigger it sooner rather than later.
Oh yeah, Tiger was pure magic when I first watched it; I was 12 when it came out, and I can pinpoint it as the exact moment when I started to watch movies more "seriously", as more than just surface-level visuals, which is why it was my first real favorite movie I had as an "adult" moviegoer. It's one of the only times that the entire audience I was seeing a movie with literally applauded a film as it ended, so it couldn't have been a more perfect experience for me. Anyway, I'll be sure to check out Come Drink With Me eventually, so don't you worry!



Blade Runner 2049



Blade Runner is probably my favorite movie, and somehow I haven't seen this one until now. The most obvious thing I must get out of the way is how gorgeous this thing is. Most sci-fi movies are a boring mess of dumb metal **** and blue light, whereas this movie has some really awesome sets that give each locale a very different feel.

Just like the original (specifically the Final Cut, because that one is clearly the best version), this film can be pretty slow burning at times. There isn't too much crazy action, but I think that's a good thing, since it makes the moments where it does happen that much more meaningful.

To me the most compelling part of both films is the philosophical implications, and this doesn't disappoint. I have my own reservations about sharing and discussing movie interpretations, but you can certainly analyze this one for a while. There's some pretty obvious symbolism in here, and it's abundant with the same sorts of themes the first one presents, while also having some more subtle details that make me want to watch this one some more.

There are a couple of parts in this movie that aren't as gripping as the rest, as well as some non-sensical plot elements, but overall this is a very worthy sequel to a movie that shouldn't of had one in the first place.
I agree with most of this; it does crawl along a bit too much at times (like the scene where K does nothing but watch the Frank Sinatra hologram for a full minute), and it doesn't make scientific sense that they can create what are essentially
WARNING: spoilers below
super-enhanced humans with the replicants, but can't make it so that those enhanced beings can't reliably procreate themselves,
but besides those and a few minor quibbles with the tone/dialogue (which bothered me less upon rewatch anyway), for the most part, it's grown on me to become a very good movie; it's both absolutely overwhelming on a sensory level (even on a 10-inch tablet screen) without becoming overkill in that regard, I appreciated the way that it went for a proper expansion of the original's story & themes, instead of being just a Force Awakens-style franchise regurgitation (although I still enjoy that movie too), and like the best Science-Fiction, it's truly a film made up of big, mind-blowing IDEAS, y'know?
I gotta be honest, though I have been a huge fan of Blade Runner since it's incept date in 1981, I found this unnecessary sequel to be a dreary, great-looking bore.
Hey, some of the greatest sequels ever made have been "unnecessary"; technically-speaking, I think The Godfather Part 2 wasn't needed, but that hasn't stopped tons of people from considering it to be not just a great sequel, but one of the greatest films ever made. And speaking personally, I definitely prefer 2049 to BR; I mean, like its sequel, the original has grown me me some over the years, but not as much as 2049 has, as pretty much every scene in Scott's film with Deckard or Rachel in it failed to grab me as much as it should've, since I've always found both of their characterizations to be relatively uninteresting. Batty is better, of course, but that still leaves Blade Runner as a film that doesn't particularly engage me for about half its running time.



Victim of The Night
Ok back again for Bond watch.

GoldenEye (Martin Campbell, 1995)
Omfg I hate the 90's so much. Every character is so unbelievably annoying because in the 90's everyone gets to be the snarky one. Like, I expect a handful of lousy quips from Bond throughout a film but no, I can't deal with every line from every character being a dumbass quip. Also, the music sucks. Also, Brosnan sucks. Nothing even remotely interesting happens until well over an hour in. There's some solid stunts but they're all shot bad and the fight scene at the end is good despite being only mid-shots and Izabella Scorupco has a really cute outfit I'm jealous of and those are the only positives the film has. Otherwise in the bin with this.


Tomorrow Never Dies (Roger Spottiswoode, 1997)
Alright so the real star of the show here is the lighting, or I guess rather how it's captured (I don't have the technical know-how to specify why it looks so good unfortunately), as every outdoor or shot-on-location scene is gorgeous with a lot of grit and texture to it but never at the expense of clarity. Scenes with obvious studio lighting are a bit hit-or-miss for me; at their best they still look top notch and at their worst they just have an (intentional) pop 90's look that I'm not much a fan of. Despite every aspect of the film getting overshadowed by the lighting, most the other elements are still solid enough. Our villain is a pretty interesting concept but still feels like a natural fit for a Bond film which caries the film through some of the more by-the-numbers plot developments and theirs some neat moments in terms of action set pieces, though nothing at all mind-blowing which is a bit sad considering Michelle Yeoh is in the cast. In the end that's really what holds the film back, lots of good stuff but very little great stuff.


Current Bond rankings:

01. From Russia with Love
02. Thunderball
03. The Spy Who Loved Me
04. Diamonds are Forever
05. Moonraker
06. On Her Majesty's Secret Service
07. Licence to Kill
08. Tomorrow Never Dies
09. Dr. No
10. The Man with the Golden Gun
11. Octopussy
12. A View to a Kill
13. For Your Eyes Only
14. Live and Let Die
15. You Only Live Twice
16. The Living Daylights
17. Goldfinger
18. GoldenEye
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't said anything but I must admit that I am truly stunned that the two Bond films you seem to have actually kinda hated are two that are generally considered and certainly by me to be the best example of "Classic Bond" and the Bond film that saved the franchise.
Personally I would probably rank Goldfinger as my No.2 Bond film and Goldeneye in the top, say 7 (though i would have to do a revisitation of the whole franchise to be sure).
I certainly don't think you're just trolling but your opinion is SO iconoclastic in this case that it actually crossed my mind.



Victim of The Night
Nine to Five (1980)

This is fun, not great, but Dolly Parton demonstrates why she is so beloved, and Dabney Coleman's a-hole boss mercifully learns nothing along the way. Rightfully, this is about a 7/10, but it's tempting to give it a 10/10 just for prompting this response from Ronald Reagan. What an absolute clownshow that dingbat was.
Jesus, Ronnie.
No wonder this country got so lost.



Victim of The Night
THE BATTLE OF ALGIERS
(1966, Pontecorvo)
A film from the Criterion Collection whose number includes the #2 (#249)





The documentary-style gives the film a gritty and realistic vibe. Without leaning heavily into any side, it helps to get a better understanding of how this war unfolded. There are no good guys or bad guys; just people fighting for their place and what they think is right. The portrayals of urban and guerrilla warfare, torture, and the extents to which each side would go to "win" is well handled.

On the other hand, this approach limits the emotional connection we can have with any character. Not that it was the goal of the film or that it *needed* it, but I felt it could've been good to have someone more tangible to hold onto. La Pointe is an enigmatic and probably interesting character, but we never get to really explore his way of thinking, or of any character actually. He's more of a blank slate than an open book.

Grade:


Full review on my Movie Loot
Interesting. I came across this maybe a year ago and I found it really gripping, like almost like nothing I'd ever seen gripping.



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.

UFO: Target Earth (Alessandro De Gaetano, 1974)
+ 3.5/10
Dissolution (Nina Menkes, 2010)
5.5/10
Once Upon A Time (Anthony LaMolinara & Zhao Xiao Ding, 2017)
+ 5/10
Pornography (Jan Jakub Kolski, 2003)
6/10

Complicated exploration of a bizarre game by two Poles involving innocent bystanders and the Nazis during WWII.
Birds (or how to be one) (Babis Makridis, 2020)
5/10
Project: Metalbeast (Alessandro De Gaetano, 1995)
+ 4.5/10
Nine Nights (Veronica McKenzie, 2019)
+ 5/10
Baby Done (Curtis Vowell, 2020)
6/10

New Zealander Rose Matafeo feels her life slipping away when she learns that she's pregnant by her boyfriend Matthew Lewis.
Devil on the Mountain AKA Sasquatch Mountain (Steven R. Monroe, 2006)
5/10
Ogre (Steven R. Monroe, 2008)
+ 4.5/10
Bride of the Gorilla (Curt Siodmak, 1951)
5/10
Family Life (Cristián Jiménez & Alicia Scherson, 2017)
6/10

Amoral Chilean Cristián Jiménez is asked to take care of his upper-class relatives' home and uses this opportunity to get a girlfriend (Gabriela Arancibia).
The Reckoning (Neil Marshall, 2020)
5/10
The Eight Immortals Restaurant: The Untold Story (Danny Lee & Herman Yau, 1993)
6/10
Bog (Don Keeslar, 1979)
4/10
Rams (Jeremy Sims, 2020)
6/10

Australian brothers, Michael Caton and Sam Neill, who haven't spoken in 40 years, have to come together when their rival sheep stud companies contract a deadly virus.
Twiceborn (Hiroshi Akabane, 2020)
+ 4.5/10
Renegade Force (Martin Kunert, 1998)
5.5/10
Trespass (Joel Schumacher, 2011)
5/10
The Executioner's Song (Lawrence Schiller, 1982)
6.5/10

Gary Gilmore (Tommy Lee Jones) is always planning his next move, even long before he commits murder.
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page



Låt den rätte komma in (2008)
aka Let the Right One In

After seeing @ScarletLion list this in The Best Looking Films thread, I wanted to give it yet another watch. It's one of my favorite films (#3 on my All-Time ballot), and this was something like fifth or sixth viewing. It's an almost perfect movie (CGI cats and the crotch shot are the only flaws, and I just pretend the other doesn't exist).
__________________





Rewatch. Still as good and stylish as I remembered.
__________________
There has been an awekening.... have you felt it?



Victim of The Night
My Bloody Valentine 3D 9/10 havent watched for ages so i watched it again cause its almost Valentines day lol
I forgot about Valentine's Day, I may need to bust out my copy of the '81 original.



Victim of The Night
Crouching Tiger remains my first and favorite Wuxia film. It’s rare that the most popular entry in a genre would be most clearly my favorite and for so long, but it has. My exploration of HK cinema only further solidified it.

The brilliance of the film relies on Lee's ability to generate nostalgia and romance for a China that only existed in the Peking Opera and Wuxia films. He's gone on the record about how the musical Love Eterne and Come Drink With Me were the most dominant films on his mind when making it and their influence comes through clearly both on that film but also how they molded his mind creatively into his hyper focus on societal repression (felt everywhere throughout from Hulk to Brokeback).

Couple that with Yuen Wo Ping's choreography, which is the greatest despite my particular love for Lau Kar Leung, and it's just a profound masterpiece.
It's such a beautiful movie. I saw it in the theater four times and I cried three of those.