Stu Presents: His Favorite Movies!

→ in
Tools    





Unforgiven (Eastwood, '92)




It's a hell of a thing, killing a man; you take away all he's got, and all he's ever gonna have.

Unforgiven is haunted by many things; as a film, it's haunted by an American west that never existed, its protagonist is haunted by the memory of his late wife, by the atrocities he committed as a young outlaw, and by the fear he'll get what he deserves in the afterlife, and finally, one could say that Clint Eastwood himself was haunted, by the long shadows his cinematic mentors still cast over his career (Sergio Leone & Don Siegel to be exact, to whose memories the film is dedicated to). However, while Will Munny never truly escapes any of the demons haunting him, the man who portrays him did, winning himself an Oscar for Best Director, in addition to the well-earned Best Picture Oscar the film itself received, earning it a richly-deserved status as a true modern classic, and the status of a "Western to end all Westerns", so to speak.

You see, it's immediately obvious that Unforgiven is no traditional Western from its first five minutes alone, when a scene of intercourse is interupted by a cowboy slashing his prostitute's face for giggling at the size of his manhood, and, when the local sheriff gives the man and his friend a rather light punishment, the women of the brothel conspire to offer a $1,000 "Wanted Dead" bounty on the two men, a catalyst that causes the notorious outlaw Will Munny to come out of "retirement". However, it's obvious from the very first moment we see him that Munny is no unstoppable, Man With No Name-style gunslinger, but a muddy, exhausted old man, struggling to wrangle his pigs, half of whom are sick anyway, into the pen of his small, meager farm, and this demythologization of the Western outlaw continues throughout Unforgiven, as Munny gets pistol-whipped half to death at one point, nearly dies from a "mere" fever instead of a bullet, and, most importantly, is constantly, emotionally tortured by the memories of the past horrors he committed.

This extends to the tone and conventions of the overall genre as well, as the prostitutes are treated more like livestock than human beings here, the "action" scenes are realistically bloody and confused, with no exciting "quick-draw" duels in sight, and law enforcement isn't shown to be any more moral than the criminals it opposes, as Gene Hackman delivers a memorably chilling performance as "Little Bill", a man who seems reasonable and pragmatic at first, but who eventually reveals himself to be a brutal sadist instead, dealing mercilessly with anyone who threatens the tranquility of his town, often enjoying himself as he does so.

He's trying to achieve a good end through evil means, a moral ambiguity that extends to Munny as well, as it's obvious that he wouldn't have taken the job if he didn't have two young children to support, he expresses constant, legitimate remorse over his past sins, and when he shoots one of his bountyheads in the gut (the one who had nothing to do the initial mutilation of the prostitute, it must be noted), Munny ceases firing when he hears the man's cries, and demands that he be brought a canteen of water, to ease the pain of a slow death just a little. Unforgiven's absolute refusal to provide any easy answers or moral conclusions is what makes it so incredibly, undeniably powerful, and elevates into being a grand eulogy for Westerns overall, really, as the whole affair has a timeless, mythical quality to it, no more so than in its masterful final shot, when Munny visits his wife's grave at sunset one last time, and, as the lone, sorrowful acoustic guitar of "Claudia's Theme" (written by Eastwood himself) begins to play, the bookending text tells us:

"Some years later, Mrs. Feathers made the arduous journey to Hodgeman County to visit the final resting place of her only daughter. William Munny had long since disappeared with the children... some said to San Francisco, where it was rumored that he prospered in dry goods. And there was nothing on the grave to explain to Mrs. Feathers why her only daughter had married a known thief and murderer, a man of notoriously violent and vicious disposition."



The Third Man (Reed, '49)



We should've dug deeper than a grave.

While the cinematic and literary roots of Film Noir stretch back well before the 40's, it's only natural that the genre would truly begin to flourish during that decade, as it obviously saw the global devastation of World War II, an event that brought a newfound paranoia and anxiety upon the world, even among the nations that were left relatively unscathed in its wake. And so, keeping that in mind, it only makes sense that Carol Reed's The Third Man had such a close connection to that conflict, as the film expertly balances its status as a living history lesson with being a wonderful piece of entertainment at the same time, telling a fantastic mystery set amongst the rubble of post-war Europe, and becoming one of the greatest Classical-era Noirs ever made in the process, if not, at the risk of hyperbole, the greatest.

It tells the story of Holly Martins, a self-described "hack writer" of pulp Westerns, who travels to Vienna in order to accept some sort of vague job offer from Harry Lime, an old friend of his. However, as soon as the hapless Holly arrives there, he's shocked to learn that Lime recently died, apparently killed in a freak car accident... that is, until a number of details fail to add up, forcing Holly to reopen the closed case himself, connecting with an old flame of Lime's that refuses to burn out, all the while continually dodging the murderous denizens of the local underworld, as he digs ever deeper into the seedy past of his "dead" friend, buried amongst the labyrinthian rubble of a post-war Vienna.

It's a fairly rich, multi-layered mystery, but rather than getting tangled up in unnecessarily convoluted plot knots like some of its peers in the genre, Graham Greene's sharply-written screenplay instead remains streamlined throughout, never becoming overly complicated just for the sake of it, but only throwing new wrinkles into the story when they're strictly needed, which keeps things intriguing without ever overwhelming us in the process. Anyway, speaking of other Noirs, The Third Man also distinguishes itself from them with its unexpected sense of fun, forgoing the fatalism that often characterized the genre with its generally lighter tone, literally from the start, with the close-up of Anton Karas's zither as it begins to play the quirky, iconic score, and continuing with a number of playful or comedic moments throughout, whether it be the sight of a small child leading a mob through the streets of Vienna, a hilarious misunderstanding involving a unwanted chauffer, or the unexpected appearance of a talking parrot at a most inconvenient moment.

All that being said though, there's still absolutely no doubt that The Third Man is a work of Film Noir on the whole, whether it be the deep, monstrously distorted shadows of its high-contrast lighting, or the way that the off-kilter dutch angles of Robert Krasker's virtuosic cinematography create a sort of topsy-turvy, funhouse mirror of reality. And, character-wise, the fresh faced, almost newborn-like naivety of Joseph Cotten's Martins starts to give way to the kind of cynicism we expect from a Noir protagonist, as he's repeatedly splashed with the cold water of Harry's greedy, sociopathic behavior throughout, with Lime himself making a tremendous impact with very little actual screentime, particularly during one of the greatest character reveals ever filmed.

But of course, despite the presence of such screen icons as Orson Welles, the real star here is Vienna itself, as the film was filmed on-location amongst the rubble of the once-glorious national capital, still recovering from the continent-wide "hangover", as a devastated city divided up among the authorities of various post-war powers, with the classy architecture of the buildings that were lucky enough to survive the war, and the rubble of the ones that weren't, providing a concrete maze for the characters to survive, and concealing a new mystery around each and every one of its sharp corners, giving the city just as much character as any of the actual, well, characters. It's this conspiratorial atmosphere the locale provides that further sets The Third Man apart as a film, makes it one of the finest examples of its genre, and ultimately creates an experience that's just as fresh and entertaining today as it was over half a century ago; now, if you'll excuse me, I think I'm going to go get some zither lessons.



Aguirre, The Wrath Of God (Herzog, '72)




On this river, God never finished his creation.


Aguirre: The Wrath Of God is nominally a period piece, focusing on a 16th-century expedition by Spanish conquistadors into the Amazon rainforest, but for a "historical" movie, it isn't particularly, er... historical. The director himself, German film legend Werner Herzog, admitted that the story is mostly fabricated, and it isn't really designed to educate us about the real Aguirre, since the historical figures it does feature are mostly used in fictitious ways. Instead, Werner Herzog uses history as his jumping-off point for a surreal, crazed fever dream of a film, portraying the inherent madness of power through the savage lens of the Amazon jungle, resulting in what is easily one of the best films I've ever seen.

Its "plot" (if it can be called that) focuses on the titular character's coup of the expedition, and Aguirre's failed journey into the Amazon to establish a grand empire, but this really isn't a film driven by story details, but rather, mood; the Amazon serves as a "set" far more memorable than any soundstage, with its thick foliage, heavy humidity, and the chirping of various unseen animals and insects creating an atmosphere that is subtly, quietly hostile to the arrogance of the "civilized" colonists to think they could ever conquer it.

It's an atmosphere that Herzog takes full advantage of, getting up close and personal with the rainforest with his unsteady, handheld camera in a guerrilla-documentary fashion, as arrows and spears, fired by unseen native tribes, continually fly at the expedition at random, and various traps and ambushes serve to steadily dwindle their numbers as their raft wears its way down the Amazon. Some might consider Aguirre's portrayal of the indigenous peoples of the Amazon as mostly hostile, cannibalistic "savages" to be rather cliched, or even offensive, but it's obvious to me that this was never meant to be a realistic portrayal of South America, but rather, a cautionary tale of the madness that comes with any kind of lust for power; after all, the European settlers of the film behave just as savagely as the "savages" do, if not more so, and its period and setting are ultimately irrelevant except so far as they enhance the film's central themes.

It isn't meant to reflect reality at all, but rather, represent Herzog's mad personal vision, and the schizophrenic, stream-of-consciousness pacing serves to further enhance the surreal mood, as the story doesn't unfold with a lot of traditional structure or momentum (a jungle adventure ala Indiana Jones, this is not), but rather, Herzog takes his time in letting everything just play out slowly, as if in a dream, seducing us into a cinematic trance, and creating an example of fragmented storytelling at its best. The film's insanity doesn't wear on you in an over the top way, but a in a slow, gentle manner, as crazy things (talking severed heads for the win) just sort of randomly... happen, and sometimes, nothing happens, like a beautiful, slow-motion, minute-long closeup of river rapids just clashing together, a moment that adds so much more to the film than any traditional plot exposition could've hoped to.

The film goes from episode to episode, lurching much like Klaus Kinski's Aguirre himself, an undeniably powerful, memorable central performance. His wild, unkempt blonde mane and deep blue eyes convey so much paranoia and madness, while his performance is still charismatic and human enough at times to make you believe that an entire group of men would willingly (at first) follow such a man to their death. Following Aguirre the film, on the other hand, will not lead you to death, but rather, something much, much better; pure, cinematic greatness.



And for a more recent addition here...


[center]Dr. Strangelove (Kubrick, '64)



We'll meet again, don't know where, don't know when...

In the immortal words of Michael Stipe, while the "end of the world as we know it" may be the last thing you'd expect to make for good fodder for comedy, in the case of Stanley Kubrick's Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb, the unlikely combination of the subject matter and genre ends up being the perfect vehicle for satirizing the inherently absurdly nature of the Cold War, resulting in one of the legendary director's greatest efforts, and my current favorite Comedy movie of all time, in a movie that somehow feels just as fresh and timely today as it did upon its release over half a century ago.

Its plot kicks off with American Air Force General Jack D. Ripper (yes, that's the character's actual name) suddenly ordering his planes to begin bombing the Soviet Union, in retaliation to a supposed attack by the enemy. However, after it's discovered that no such Soviet aggression has taken place, it's clear that the insane, "bodily fluids"-obsessed General actually ordered a pre-emptive strike in a bout of Commie-induced paranoia, as part of a ploy to force Washington's hand in completely wiping out the bad ol' USSR, lest the same fate befall the States when the Ruskies have to counter-attack in response to Ripper's act. And thus, a mad, international dash commences across military and government bureaucracies, in order to abort this act of worldwide suicide, and that's before even factoring in the existence of a secretive "Doomsday Machine" to complicate matters, and make this incredibly dire situation somehow even worse than it already was.

And I know that all sounds like super-heavy stuff, and to a certain extent it is, with the film partially serving as a time capsule of genuine, prodding insight into the policies and mindset of such a tense era, but Kub and company were still able to find joy in the destruction of the world, or at least recognized the insanity present within the Cold War and brought it to the surface, exchanging the serious tone of the source novel Red Alert for that of a satire, starting with little touches like a bomber pilot absent-mindedly reading a Playboy magazine in mid flight, and steadily escalating things from there, until the film climaxes with the now-iconic image of a man "riding" an atomic bomb all the way to its target like it's a bucking bronco, hooting, hollering, and waving his ten gallon cowboy hat all the while.

However, Strangelove not only has the nerve to mock the Cold War around a time when tensions between the two superpowers were at their highest, but also takes its razor-sharp aim at the leaders behind such "MAD" ideas, with the sight of a feckless American President fumbling his way through a one-sided phonecall with a drunk Soviet premier serving to pierce the veil of respectability that often shrouds such officials in real life, and revealing them to be silly, petty men obsessed with the size of their arsenals and the potential prospect of a "mindshaft gap", non-chalantly dismissing the prospect of casualty figures in the millions, in-between stopping to take personal calls from their secretary/lovers waiting for them at home.

Of course, the cast does a lot of the heavy lifting in that regard as well, with George C. Scott's manic General Turgidson, Slim Pickens being, well, Slim Pickens, or Peter Seller's brilliant trifecta of performances, including the titular character's demented grin, wacky "German" accent, and struggles with his seemingly possessed right hand serving to bring every character to vivid life here, and heighten the absurdity, while still somehow keeping things grounded enough to have some sort of relation to the grim reality it's satirizing. Add on top of all of that Gilbert Taylor's cinematography, which balances striking, in your face compositions (which are often in the characters' faces as well) with jarring zoom-ins and ahead-of-its-time handheld camerawork, which gives the film an immediacy that was often lacking in Hollywood at the time, and you get a Comedy of (world-ending) errors, ensuring that if you have to watch the end of human civilization, at least you'll be laughing your head off as you do so.

Favorite Moment:



Pan's Labyrinth (del Toro, '06)



Dare to enter.

It's a sad reality, but the truth is, no one is immune from the various horrors of the real world, whether it by death, emotional sorrow, or even war, and that's especially true for those among us who are the least prepared to deal with them, particularly children; in fact, the helplessness of childhood can often actually magnify such horrors, and make them even worse than they already are, leaving the people affected desperate for any sort of escape from them. And, what better escape than the one that's offered to us in cinema, the artform that's given people temporary relief from reality for well over a century now? However, rather than serving as a denial of such reality, Guillermo del Toro's Pan's Labyrinth serves as a cold reaffirmation of it, yet one that derives its power from the way that it blends the real with the fantastical, creating what is, at the risk of sounding hyperbolic, an absolute masterpiece, as a film that's not only my favorite from del Toro to date, but also just one of my favorite movies of all time.

It tells the story of Ofelia, a highly imaginative girl who's forced to move to the Spanish countryside with her pregnant mother, in order to live with her cruel, sadistic stepfather, an army captain who's waging a brutal campaign to eradicate the last of the local rebels in the area, left over in the aftermath of the country's civil war. Faced with this harsh new reality, Ofelia begins escaping into a fantasy world with the help of an ancient Faun (the purveyor of the titular "labyrinth"), who gives her three tasks to complete before the next full moon, in order for her to achieve immortality, and return to the idyllic underground kingdom that she supposedly came from, where Ofelia's real family is awaiting her return (or so he claims). And so, undertaking this quest, Ofelia must deal with the lines between her fantasy and reality, and the various kinds of horrors contained within both realms, becoming increasingly ambigious and blurred, as she becomes ever more desperate to find an escape from her cruel new life, and the conflict outside creeps closer and closer to her front door.

Because of all this, Pan's Labyrinth ends up being a highly unique mixture of genres, blending disparate elements of Fantasy, Horror, and War films all into one, but it's a mix that del Toro makes work superbly well together, by taking his time to build the world here, and maintaining a tonal consistency even as he "shifts gears", with the horrors of the rich fantasy world serving to be almost as disturbing as the stomach-churning violence of the actual guerrilla warfare depicted outside it, as the two tones serve to compliment each other, making us sympathize with Ofelia's desperate plight, and yearn for an escape from it right along with her, creating a dark, violent fairy tale that's experienced by a child, but one that holds just as much weight (if not moreso) for the adults watching it.

Besides that, Pan's also excels on a technical & emotional level, with its eerie, darkly enchanting tone, rich color hues, and ornate sets and production design bringing the murky underworld within it to undeniable life, as its elaborate fantasy setpieces, lead by a solitary Ofelia all on her own, make us feel just as immersed in them as she does. Additionally, del Toro's lifelong fascination with fantastical creatures reaches its creative peak here, particularly with the character of The Faun, who, even buried underneath a mountain's worth of makeup and prosthetics, still very much comes alive with the wise, earthy performance of frequent del Toro collaborator Doug Jones stealing the show. Of course, he's far from the only memorable character here, as Sergi López's Captain Vidal proves to be just as memorable a presence, even in a far more grounded form, as his particular brand of authoritarian evil serves to horrify just as much as any of the creatures in the film, in a way that is as as chilling as it is believable, proving that the evil of people in the real world can be just as bad, if not worse, than the monsters of our imaginations.

Finally, on that note, Pan's Labyrinth leaves a lasting impression with its political themes, and the way it deconstructs the message of many fairytales that are designed to instill obediance in children, by creating an ode to the virtue of disobediance in the face of oppression, a message that has become sadly more urgent in the decade and a half since its release (for more detail, go watch the Nerdwriter1's excellent video essay on Youtube on the subject). But, outside of its particular historical or political contexts, the greatest power of Pan's ultimately lies on a personal level, particularly with its tragic ending, which is set to the haunting sound of a forgotten lullaby, and the sight of a fading life proving to be one of the most heartbreaking things I've ever seen in a film, albeit in the most beautiful of ways; do you dare enter?

Final Score: 10



Goodfellas ('90, Scorsese)



As far back as I can remember, I always wanted to be a gangster...

WARNING: spoilers below
What is it about the gangster that fascinates us so much? Whether they be fictional or real, there's just something about gangsters, and the unencumbered power fantasies they embody that hold an undying fascination for us, despite (or maybe a bit because of?) the moral failings inherent to their lifestyles. It's something that filmmakers have tried to capture time and time again in movies through the years, but for my money, no other film did it better than Martin Scorsese's Goodfellas, as the cinematic icon took a lifelong fascination with these denizens of the underworld, and filtered it through the perspective of a man who not only shared that fascination, but actually made it a reality for himself, resulting in what is, despite his tremendous body of work, ultimately Marty's very finest hour as a director, and a complete and total cinematic jolt to the system, just as fresh and invigorating today as it was in thirty-plus years ago.

It tells the true story of Henry Hill, a working class kid from Manhattan who grows up idolizing the Lucchese mobsters who run the cabstand across the street, with Henry joining and working his way up their ranks from an early age, starting with petty tasks like parking cars, before "graduating" to real crimes such as torching rival businesses, before finally becoming a full-fledged gangster once he's come of age. From there, it's a whirlwind of white powders, fast living, and easy murder for Hill, one that ultimately threatens to consume him entirely, with the young wiseguy not knowing if the end will come with him rotting in a jail cell courtesy of the law, or meeting an early death in a shallow grave out in the middle of nowhere due to his gangster "friends", whether it be to keep him from ratting them out, or just him saying the right wrong word needed to fire their hair trigger tempers.

It's a lot to take in, but fellas never, ever bogs down or feels bloated, despite it's over two hour running time, as Scorsese takes the source material of Nicholas Pileggi's true crime book Wiseguy, and absolutely RUNS with it, right from the jarring, in media res murder scene that opens the film, and never so much as takes a glance back from there. Well, it actually does glance back as it goes to Henry's childhood, but it doesn't hit the brakes at all in doing so, as the film lays out the first quarter century of Hill's (criminal) life in quick vigenettes that are all the more impactful for their brevity, before it takes a bit more time to develop the more eventful incidents, such as the infamous Billy Bats beatdown, before finally documenting Hill's ultimate downfall from a wiseguy to a common "schnook", hiding out in Witness Protection, and having to settle for egg noodles and ketchup for a meal.

On the whole, it has the pacing of cokehead at the height of a week-long bender (which is very appropriate, considering the main figure here), aided greatly by Thelma Schoonmaker's frantic rapid-fire editing, which is so prominent, she should really get billing alongside Liotta, De Niro, and Pesci as one of the film's stars. However, that's not the only weapon in Goodfellas' sizeable arsenal of cinematic techniques, as Marty and company add a veritable jukebox worth of period hits for its soundtrack, and the absolutely kinectic cinematography makes copious use of close-ups, jittery zoom-ins, sudden freeze frames, elaborate tracking shots (the Copacabana, anyone?), as Scorsese's signature dramatic slow motion serving to further hammer home the moments that defined Hill even harder to us as an audience.

Finally, Goodfellas excels by bringing us as deep as possible within Henry's life, with the voiceover narration from both his and his wife Karen's individual perspectives laying out the seductive allure of it, as well the inner workings and rules that govern that particular (under)world, to the point that you almost feel like a gangster yourself just by watching them live their daily lives. In this way, we get as cozy as possible with the wiseguys, amidst all their profane banter, macho posturing, and violent outbursts, to the point that we're almost as disappointed as Hill is when he comes to his ultimate fate in surburban hell, looking back on his lifetime of crimetime with a wistful smile on his face, the same kind that's hopefully on your face as well, at the sight of such a great movie coming to an end; like Sid Vicious "sang", he did it his way...


Final Score: 10



He reveres such classics as Unforgiven (Eastwood, '92) or Goodfellas ('90, Scorsese). The latter, by the way, probably ranks among the cult classics when it comes to gangster films (Ray Liotta, Joe Pesci and Robert De Niro are actors who need no introduction.