The thing is that I don't think that "self-indulgent art movies" are inherently bad.
I never said that they were bad. However, I can understand why 99% of the people would perceive then as bad. It's like viking metal: I love it but I understand why 99% of the people would not love it.
Am I really supposed to care that directors "don't need to care for their audience"?
Well, sometimes it tends to make the stuff pretty boring. I like Miyazaki because he makes stuff to entertain the audience but simultaneously is his own artistic expression: the perfect marriage of art and entertainment.
I think that things can get bad if you go to far in either direction (self indulgence or pandering to your audience). Finding a healthy middle ground like Miyazaki does is ideal.
The flip-side of caring too much about your audience is what you get with Hollywood trying to capitalise on whatever faces or brands will make them the most money from audiences, which is more likely to stifle creativity than inspire it. Why else do so many people piss and moan about the floods of reboots and sequels and whatever else?
I think the problem of Hollywood these days is that they are making films for the world and not for the US market. This means that their movies are stripped down from any cultural background and become soulless visual exntertainment. Still they made some very good blockbusters like The Lord of the Rings.
Yes, the majority of the blockbusters is bad but that applies to the majority of ANYTHING. The majority of everything is bad: manga, TV shows, indie movies, blockbuster movies, etc.
Even the trade-off of French directors trying to make more accessible movies isn't going to be an improvement if it means we get sh*t like The Transporter or Taken.
I really enjoyed those two movies actually.
Bresson not being mainstream even in France doesn't mean anything to me if I can still recognise the strength of a film like A Man Escaped sixty years later - how many popular Hollywood films from 1956 can claim similar status?
Well, I never said not being mainstream was bad, since most of my favorites are not mainstream. For instance, I actually have A Man Escaped in my top 50 movies/TV shows list. That was a really powerful experience.
Hell, wasn't Akira more beloved by non-Japanese audiences than Japanese ones?
Not remotely. In Japan Akira is not a "cult" title in any way shape or form.
In Japan, Akira grossed 6.4 billion yen in 1988 which makes it a blockbuster sucess (equivalent of grossing about 350 million dollars in North America today).
While the Akira manga remains the single most influential manga/graphic novel of the past 40 years. Specially in terms of its line art and aesthetic style, it has redefined the comic medium. And that's considering manga/graphic novels are enormously more popular than movies in Japan (manga sales are about 10 to 15 times larger than movie ticket sales over the past 40 years in Japan, Japanese live action film directors are starving and they complain that the Japanese government doesn't give then subsidies like the French ones get).