0
I enjoyed it too, it's not a comedy which makes you drop dead on the floor dripping saliva and inflecting stomach ache.
(But) it has some highly enjoyable original notable ideas crafted, just the general roofing narrative is very interesting - a film inside a film.
The film makes a travesty out of film makers and all what is around them, there crews, production, actors, the process of creating, stereotypes (for instance the 'junkie' actor) even acting methods (see "the method") and of course usual film cliches, which all found expression rather well and in an entertaining manner.
The opening and introduction to the characters was original and recreative (the 'trailers'), IMO it wasn't a bad film at all.
Towards the passing of the center the film gets a little slow and falls into a quagmire of slowly drowning into cliches (and making fun of them on the way), the movie itself moves between not so sharply epigrammatical to bluntly boring at parts.
So it isn't a bad film, as I mentioned it's worth watching and I enjoyed it.
__________________
"Open your eyes, Clevinger. It doesn't make a damned bit of difference who wins the war to someone who's dead."