Short Cuts 1993
Altman's might be the most probable, but that doesn't make it the best. With such a enormous cast of characters comes a mentality that one person doesn't really matter, an opinion voiced by one of the characters near the end. You can't assign a movie like this to one chorus though, where the creators have almost too many things to say. No my chief protest with
Short Cuts, is the narrative laxity and disjointed nature of all the main characters.
It's compelling for the sheer bulk of people and events, but my interest fades in and out because there is a certain mildness and tame, even at it's most wild moments. For the first thirty minutes it introduces you to families and couples, luring you with cheating spouses and tired romance. Most every arc for every player, is directly related to one of the few extravagant events throughout. Be it a dead body in the lake, an off screen vacation, or a car accident. Every pitch is an obvious curve-ball. It took a 7.4 on the Richter scale to actually shake me.
How are the people actually tied together ? Very loosely. Some will lose someone, some will meet each other, most won't have anything to do with anyone else. Some people will do one thing and never be seen again. Twenty minutes is foot deep and that's what most of the company gets. This contrast takes a toll on the performances and that's what
should matter most in Short Cuts.
In this Los Angeles, sometimes a smooth jazz will fill the air, identifiable by a hint of soul. Something curiously absent in the city's inhabitants.