Quentin Tarantino's 10th Film

Tools    







There aren't any details yet about Quentin Tarantino's 10th and supposedly final film before he retires...supposedly.

However, he recently hinted that his next project will be an "epilogue" with a "big show-stopping climax".

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/ne...ogue-y-1230249


Any guesses as to how this film will turn out and what it will be?
__________________
“Let me tell you something you already know. The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It's a very mean and nasty place and I don't care how tough you are, it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain't about how hard ya hit. It's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward. How much you can take and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done!” ~ Rocky Balboa



"Money won is twice as sweet as money earned."



I personally hope his next movie is a return to the gritty men-in-cheap-suits gangster film genre that follows in the footsteps of his first 2 films: Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction.

A sequel of sorts to Pulp Fiction, which follows Samuel Jackson's character Jules Winnfield many years later to see what he's been up to after he decided to "walk the earth like Caine in Kung Fu", would be cool, too.



Welcome to the human race...
For some reason, I imagine his Star Trek movie being a feature-length Holodeck episode.

Part of me wonders how practical it would be to do a full-on Tarantinoverse movie where various characters from all his different movies float in and out, though the central premise would arguably be a third Kill Bill where Vernita's daughter seeks revenge on the Bride - then again, the idea of Tarantino doing his version of Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back sounds like...a mixed bag.
__________________
Way too much stupid talk on the forum. Iroquois, I’m thinking about you.



28 days...6 hours...42 minutes...12 seconds
He's mentioned how his universe is split it two. The real one and the cinematic one. So the characters in Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction are real and if they would go to see a movie, they'd see Kill Bill. Granted, I think he only considers his movie universe to be Kill Bill and From Dusk Till Dawn.

As for me? I'd like to see him take on sic/fi, but that would become part of his movie universe and wouldn't feel epilogue-y, so maybe he should go back to his earlier movies? But does an artist want to go backwards or forwards?

I never did like seeing the numbered films in the marketing of his movies. "The 4th film by Quentin Tarantino", it always felt pretentious to me, but it fits Tarantino's persona.
__________________
"A laugh can be a very powerful thing. Why, sometimes in life, it's the only weapon we have."

Suspect's Reviews



Yeah, Tarantino is definitely the rare "pretentious, but mostly backs it up" guy, for me. I can also appreciate the fact that the pretentiousness sort of fits his filmmaking style in a meta sense.
__________________



I remember reading way back in the late 2000s that Tarantino wanted to do a movie that made fun of 70s Kung Fu movies that was dubbed deliberately badly. I hope he makes that one if that was true that he wanted to.



I remember reading way back in the late 2000s that Tarantino wanted to do a movie that made fun of 70s Kung Fu movies that was dubbed deliberately badly. I hope he makes that one if that was true that he wanted to.
I thought Kung-Pow already did that but I'm intrigued how Tarantino would approach this kind of comedy.