Rate The Last Movie You Saw

Tools    





I forgot the opening line.

By The poster art can or could be obtained from Universal Pictures., Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=24902935

Halloween III : Season of the Witch - (1982)

One of my favourite horror films. When Halloween III came out I didn't necessarily think it was going to feature Michael Myers, but I thought it was going to be connected to the universe he exists in. I thought it might be a kind of spin-off, and we'd touch on why he was the way he was while going off in a new direction. Back then, when first watching this, I slowly started to get the feeling it had nothing to do with the first two films, and then I saw the TV commercial for Halloween which confirmed that this was set in a universe that had nothing to do with the first two films. I felt cheated, because I thought sequels were like chapters in books, where a story continues. Funnily enough, my feelings of anger over that overshadowed the fact that I'd kind of enjoyed the movie itself. It took years and repeated viewings (of which I always came away liking the film even more) before I came to regard this stand-alone sequel as the best Halloween film barring the original. I'm a huge fan. Dan O'Herlihy's wickedly evil performance is brilliant, and if you watch him closely you'll see all kinds of little nuances in it. The story, combining ancient folk horror and modern technology, is creepy and was very original in it's day. The whole "bugs and snakes" weird and ghastly horror (they just erupt from people's heads when they wear these specific Halloween masks) is inspired, sickly and truly frightening. Every moment of horror in this works so well. I don't watch this every Halloween, but I sometimes do. I really enjoyed it yet again last night.

8/10


By "Copyright 1953 Columbia Pictures Corp." - Scan via Heritage Auctions. C, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/inde...curid=88034804

The Big Heat - (1953)

The Big Heat ticks so many boxes as far as great film noir traits go, and good movies period. Full review here, in my watchlist thread.

9/10
__________________
Remember - everything has an ending except hope, and sausages - they have two.

Latest Review : I Want to Live! (1958)






1st Rewatch...This lavish movie musical directed by Walter Lang (The King and I ) chronicles a family vaudeville act called the Five Donahues, Molly (Ethel Merman), husband Terry (Dan Dailey) and their three children Tim (Donald O'Connor), Katy (Mitzi Gaynor) and Steve (Johnnie Ray), whose act falls apart when Steve decides to quit to become a priest and an ambitious showgirl (Marilyn Monroe) becomes an obsession of Tim's. The film features just about every song Irving Berlin ever wrote, either performed or utilized as background music. The film features lavish settings and costumes and the cast is terrific, but Marilyn is the show here, proving once and for all that she was no dumb blonde she just played on a lot, because her character here, Vicky, is no dummy and just like in Gentleman Prefer Blondes, whenever Marilyn is onscreen, you can't take your eyes off her. The musical numbers are brilliantly choreographed by Robert Altman, I especially loved the multi-language version of "Alexander's Ragtime Band" performed by the Donahues and Marilyn's "Heat Wave". This is also another one of those 50's musicals that features George Chakiris in the chorus.





HERE


If you're a big Robert Zemeckis fan, you will probably enjoy HERE much more than the average moviegoer.

Zemeckis has been experimenting with narrative in so many interesting ways in recent years that it's easy to take him for granted; in some ways, I think he's at his best when he gets to work with Tom Hanks.

His latest movie is a multi-generational saga spanning, well, strictly speaking, millions of years, although for the most part it concentrates on events from the 20th century.

This isn't the kind of movie that I think the average moviegoer will have the patience to really appreciate - the still-camera trick hasn't been used much lately, and it may put off some viewers.

That means essentially that the camera doesn't move at all for 99.9% of the movie - everything revolves around shifting the temporal perspective, sometimes going forwards, and sometimes going back.

Hanks is also reunited with Robin Wright, and they get to play characters from their teenage years to old age, thanks to the movie magic that Zemeckis is so good at playing with. Paul Bettany and Kelly Reilly are also wonderful, playing the parents of the Hanks character.

There's a lot of creativity here, because it isn't easy to tell a story where the camera basically never moves - but Zemeckis and his awesome cast have come through with flying colors.



I don't actually wear pants.
I watched Triangle, a horror picture from 2009, this morning. It's about stranded yachters who think an ocean liner is going to save them and take them ashore. The ocean liner has other ideas. Last night I added some Freeve films to my Prime Video Watchlist, and Triangle was one of them, so I went ahead and watched it this morning. It is an interesting film that is a little up and down. Overall it's very good albeit inconsistent, I think would be a good word.

The idea feels very much like an episode of Twilight Zone what involves a U-boat captain on an ocean liner that sinks, except Triangle has more gunfire and blood and swearing. I won't give away the ending. I will say it was nicely done. I thought the lead actress, Melissa George, who plays Jess, did a great job in her role. Her support was some good some less good and overall all right. If her character had a month of therapy the movie wouldn't have happened.

Really though the movie is quite good. I am glad I took the time to watch it. I think an 8/10 is a good score for it. It's not perfect. However, it is well-done and rather captivating.
__________________
I destroyed the dastardly dairy dame! I made mad milk maid mulch!



Look out! Here's seven more Westerns!



Track of the Cat (William A. Wellman / 1954)
Seven Men from Now (Budd Boetticher / 1956)
Warlock (Edward Dmytryk / 1959)
Death Rides a Horse (Giulio Petroni / 1967)
Jeremiah Johnson (Sydney Pollack / 1972)
Keoma (Enzo G. Castellari / 1976)
Open Range (Kevin Costner / 2003)

Track of the Cat is a Western, it is directed by William A. Wellman, and it's based on a novel by Walter Von Tilburg Clark. But believe me, those are the only three things this one has in common with 1943's The Ox-Bow Incident! If anything, it's proof of Wellman's range and stylistic diversity. It's this very strange tale of a very dysfunctional family living on a ranch in Northern California during the winter months, during which their cattle herd is terrorized by the ravages of a mysterious (and unseen) panther, and Robert Mitchum's character is determined to track it down and kill it. I've read some rather mixed commentary on this film in different books, one writer comparing it to a Roger Corman / Edgar Allan Poe film from the early '60s, and another describing its story as being like a bad Eugene O'Neill play. So I was naturally quite intrigued and quite determined to check it out. And I'm really glad I did, because it's one of the most unique and eccentric Westerns from the '50s.

Seven Men From Now is the first of seven films that director Budd Boetticher made with Randolph Scott and which have come to be known as the Ranown Cycle. This one, alas, wasn't part of The Ranown Westerns box set which the Criterion Collection recently released, so I had to get it separately. And it's really quite good. Not necessarily the best of the seven (I personally prefer The Tall T, Decision at Sundown and Ride Lonesome), but it's definitely worth watching. I mean, Lee Marvin plays the villain, and you can't go wrong there!

Warlock stars Henry Fonda plays a legendary freelance marshal who is hired to deal with some no-good cowboys making trouble in the town of Warlock. Anthony Quinn plays his Fonda's scheming partner, and Richard Widmark is the reformed cowboy who ultimately has to stand up to Fonda. This one's quite a nifty late '50s epic Western, and there's more than just a hint of the Tombstone / Wyatt Earp legend in the story. Oh, and Star Trek's DeForest Kelley plays one of the cowboy gang, so there's a nice bit of icing on the cake!

Death Rides a Horse is one of several Italian Westerns from the late '60s that starred legendary American character actor Lee Van Cleef, best known from the second and third films in Sergio Leone's "Dollars / Man With No Name" Trilogy. John Phillip Law plays a young man whose entire family was killed in front of him when he was a boy, and he has sworn revenge on the outlaw gang responsible. Lee Van Cleef plays the older gunfighter who comes to his aid, and who has his own particular beef with the members of the gang. I must admit, though I thought this was a really good Italian Western, I didn't like it quite as much as other films from the period starring Van Cleef, in particular The Big Gundown and Day of Anger (which also came out in '67). My main problem is John Phillip Law, whose performance I thought was really stiff.

Jeremiah Johnson is a very cool wilderness adventure starring Robert Redford as the title character, a war veteran who retires from civilization and heads up to the Rockies to live as a mountain man. Will Geer plays the grizzled eccentric who becomes Jeremiah's mentor. I thought this was a very effective film, and it's definitely got its share of tragedy and melancholy.

Keoma is an Italian Western from its "twilight" period in the late '70s, during which the sub-genre was kind of fading and on its last legs. Django's Franco Nero turns in his second most iconic Western performance as the title character, a half-Indian Civil War veteran who returns to his hometown to confront his three half-brothers, who have allied themselves with a tyrant named Caldwell who has taken over the town and put it on lockdown while a plague is ravaging the populace. William Berger plays Keoma's sympathetic father, and the legendary Woody Strode plays his childhood mentor George, who has become an alcoholic and must recover his former strength in order to help take the town back. There's also a mysterious old woman who appears to Keoma, who may be a witch or may even represent Death itself. A very strong and compelling late Italian Western, with a bent towards the mystical and religious allegory.

Open Range stars Robert Duvall and Kevin Costner - the latter of whom also directed - as open range cattlemen who run afoul of a tyrannical Irish rancher (Michael Gambon) who largely runs the local town of Harmonville, and whose men have crippled one of their hired hands (Diego Luna) and killed another (Abraham Benrubi). Costner's character is a Civil War veteran dealing with traumatic memories of the conflict, and he eventually develops a relationship with the town doctor's sister (Annette Bening). Whle not quite conceived on the grand scale of Dances With Wolves or Horizon: An American Saga, this movie definitely showcases Costner's ability to deal with more intimate characterizations and storytelling. Of Costner's Westerns, this is certainly more of a "chamber piece." And it doesn't hurt that Michael Gambon is one of those actors who excels at playing villains. (If you don't believe me, check out Peter Greenaway's The Cook, the Thief, His Wife & Her Lover from 1989. He plays a serious piece of work in that one!)
__________________
"Well, it's what people know about themselves inside that makes 'em afraid" - Clint Eastwood as The Stranger, High Plains Drifter (1973)

"I'll let you be in my dream if I can be in yours" - Bob Dylan, Talkin' World War III Blues (1963)



THE SPIRAL STAIRCASE
(1946, Siodmak)
Horror film from the 1940s



"Anything can happen in the dark."

Set in early 20th Century, The Spiral Staircase follows Helen (Dorothy McGuire), a mute young woman that is being stalked by a serial killer that seems to be targeting disabled women. When circumstances force an assorted group of characters to converge at the house, she has to figure out who is the killer, how to stay safe, and what's happening in the dark down the spiral staircase.

This is a film I had probably heard mentioned here and there, but didn't know much else about it. However, it is directed by Robert Siodmak (The Killers, Criss Cross), so I decided to jump in and it was a very pleasant surprise. Part of its assets is precisely in Siodmak's direction, which adds a very effective atmosphere of eeriness and dread to what's happening. This is part because of his directing and camera movement, but also for its use of light and dark.

Grade:



Full review on my Movie Loot
__________________
Check out my podcast: The Movie Loot!



THE SKELETON DANCE
(1929, Disney)
Horror film from the 1920s



"You never forget how to dance. It's just a matter of your bones working and things like that." --Christopher Walken

Like many early animated shorts, The Skeleton Dance can be seen as an excuse to test many animation techniques. There are owls hooting, bats flying, spiders crawling, dogs howling, and cats arching before the titular skeletons come in. They tiptoe and walk and dance and run, all to the sound of Carl Stalling's music. The coordination of both animation and music is pretty cool.

Grade:







HELL'S BELLS
(1929, Iwerks)
Horror film from the 1920s



"♪ I won't take no prisoners, won't spare no lives. Nobody's puttin' up a fight...♫"

Hell's Bells was released right after The Skeleton Dance in 1929. Following a similar template to Disney's short, this one is set in Hell where we can see Satan and several of his minions dancing around, playing instruments, and having fun... until Satan gets hungry and decides to take no prisoners and spare no lives.

Grade:



Full reviews on my Movie Loot





Emilia Perez


Emilia Perez is one of the most highly-anticipated year-end releases, and there's definitely a very good chance one or more of the actors in it will win an Oscar for their work here - and they absolutely would deserve it.

As for whether or not the movie works as well as its director intended, well, that's a different question altogether. I have extremely mixed feelings about it, because there are undoubtedly things about it that I liked a lot, but I don't think the film as a whole is as good as some of its parts.

Without going too much into spoiler material, I will simply say that the film tries to have it both ways, addressing some very serious social issues while at the same time the main storyline is something out of a telenovela. It is a jarring issue, because the issues are serious but the plot can't really be taken seriously, and people in the movie don't behave like any real person would.

Then there's the matter of the movie looking very much like it was made in a backlot somewhere, even though most of the movie takes place in Mexico City - and there's absolutely nothing in the movie that really could come close to capturing the most majestic aspects of North America's biggest city.

Neither do the musical numbers, for the most part, reflect much of the local culture.

The cast does a wonderful job with the material they've been given, although unfortunately, Selena Gomez stands out like a sore thumb speaking Spanish like a pocha, something that absolutely nobody ever comments on during the movie (the chances of that actually happening in Mexico are about the same as those of the temperature in hell reaching the freezing point).

While watching the movie, I kept thinking that this felt very much like an old man's well-meaning take on some of the stuff that's happening today in the world. I didn't remember off the top of my head how old director Jacques Audiard is, but I still couldn't shake that feeling. Looking him up after the movie was over, I saw that he's currently 72.

So, yes, the movie definitely feels like something put together by an old man trying to keep up with the times, and it absolutely means well and wears its heart on its sleeve, but it also feels like out of the current zeitgeist in some small but very important ways.

This is definitely a movie worth watching - and totally worth seeking out during its all-too-brief theatrical release; it will barely play on theaters before it starts streaming on Netflix.



RIP www.moviejustice.com 2002-2010
THE SPIRAL STAIRCASE
(1946, Siodmak)
Horror film from the 1940s





Set in early 20th Century, The Spiral Staircase follows Helen (Dorothy McGuire), a mute young woman that is being stalked by a serial killer that seems to be targeting disabled women. When circumstances force an assorted group of characters to converge at the house, she has to figure out who is the killer, how to stay safe, and what's happening in the dark down the spiral staircase.

This is a film I had probably heard mentioned here and there, but didn't know much else about it. However, it is directed by Robert Siodmak (The Killers, Criss Cross), so I decided to jump in and it was a very pleasant surprise. Part of its assets is precisely in Siodmak's direction, which adds a very effective atmosphere of eeriness and dread to what's happening. This is part because of his directing and camera movement, but also for its use of light and dark.

Grade:



Full review on my Movie Loot
Robert Siodmak is a name I had never heard of before until maybe a year ago or so they had a featured collection of his films on the Criterion Channel. I went through near all the selections and his stuff is SOOO good. I especially was fond of Phantom Lady. I don't think I've seen Spiral Staircase however.

Also tonight's viewing:

The Big Clock (1948, John Farrow) - A-



I forgot the opening line.

By CineMaterial, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=59586270

Secretary - (2002)

I've always loved this film, but oh boy - it walks a tightrope through all kinds of highly charged and concerning territory with it's two psychologically complex characters. Lee Holloway (Maggie Gyllenhaal) self harms, and comes from a dysfunctional family - growing up I never had much exposure to people who cut and/or otherwise hurt themselves. I met people as I got older - and it's not a headspace you can really share. She gets a job as a secretary for lawyer E. Edward Grey (James Spader), who battles with shyness and a lack of self confidence, which produces worrying behaviour that should really see him get in trouble, being abusive - but it just so happens that it's behaviour which excites Lee, and that's not something Grey expects or understands fully himself, despite appearances. Making matters more messy is Lee's painfully nice boyfriend Peter (Jeremy Davies). Can this troubling set of circumstances possibly lead to a happy ending? It's all so dark and kind of disturbing, but also funny and slightly crazy. I don't think anyone should relate what happens in Secretary to real life, but as a film it's quite a departure from most any other movie you might decide to watch, and our exploration of Lee is a fascinating journey to go on. Anyone else, and this would be the story of an horrifically abused secretary taking her lawyer boss on in court, but instead turns out to be a raunchy delve into S&M and a love story featuring a pair of damaged souls. Great performances from Gyllenhaal and Spader. A new purchase on Blu-Ray.

8/10

I rewatched Saint Maud (2019) - It keeps the 8/10 score I originally gave it.


By Focus Features, Universal Pictures - IMP Awards., Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72775428

Inside - (2023)

Inside seems to have a lot to say about art and the artistic process, doing so within the familiar narrative of a protagonist having to survive with limited resources, and in complete isolation while trapped in the apartment he's tried to rob. It's helped along a great deal of the way by the talented Willem Dafoe. Full review here, in my watchlist thread.

7/10



Anora (2024) - My second Baker... the first 30 minutes or so were pretty meh but little did I know that it was all being set up. Best thing about this section is establishing Ani's character and Mikey Madison's performance; who totally convinces us of her profession and world-view. The editing never makes it feel boring.

It really gets going once the russians show up though, one stealing the show from another. I kid you not, my entire theater was laughing for a good hour in the middle... until Ani's disillusionment is completed. Great moments with the mother near the end. QT is quoted word by word at some point, but this thing never feelsl like a copycat, which is impressive.

I preferred if they didn't dumb down (that's the best expression I've got atm) Yura Borisov's character as much as they did, but man, that closure hit me like a Sam Shepard story.

Would make my top 5 of the year (along with Challengers, The Substance, The Bikeriders and Love Lies Bleeding) for the time being....

__________________
HEI guys.



I failed to finish Under the Skin and Holy Motors, on a rewatch of both.
Both decent enough movies. I think Holy Motors is the better of the two.
Johansen is terrific, but really you can only watch so many blokes getting in a van then wandering around in total blackness before sinking into some gunk, whilst the same musical refrain plays over and over again. Really it becomes vacuous.
Holy Motors is nothing if not original! And I do like that. I also can't deny that it is gripping and absorbing, which is a great sign for a film. It is just such complete nonsense though that I reached the point where I couldn't abide it, and I realised I was only still watching now because I wanted to see Kylie.
I can understand others liking these films, especially HM, but they aren't for me. I'm moving on to something else.



Raven73's Avatar
Boldly going.
Plane
7/10.
I was hoping to see Gerard Butler yell "This... is... my plane!" and then kick a bad guy out the door of the plane... but all the fighting took place on the ground. Oh well.
There were a few moments that bended reality too much, but this tends to happen in action movies. Overall, it was an entertaining one.

WARNING: "more cheap humur" spoilers below
Airplane (1980) ruined airplane movies for me: at the end when the passengers are exiting the plane after their terrible ordeal, I picture the flight attendant brightly smiling and thanking the passengers for flying the airline.

__________________
Boldly going.



The Guy Who Sees Movies
Here - This was too sentimental for me. The movie plays out in a a single place, in multiple time spans, ranging from the dinosaurs, the asteroid impact, the ice ages, the colonial era and down to some version of recent time.

People are born and die here, as do dinosaurs. Hanks and Wright are married characters, waning with age and dementia. They lived most of their lives in this house...births and deaths, good times and not-so-good, met challenges, and somehow managed to stay together, not to mention, redecorate that same room a bunch of times

The movie is heavy with seeming heartfelt emotion, to the point that I got overdosed. I basically agreed with the sentiment, but it was poured on too thick for me. My movie partner, generally more sentimental than I am, agreed. We see Tom Hanks and Robin Wright, as well as some supporting characters, at many different ages, wearing many kinds of presumably digital makeup.

By the time it was over, I was wishing for those dinosaurs to stomp on that house.






I forgot the opening line.

By scanned from the DVD cover, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=13199933

As Tears Go By - (1988)

You've got to start somewhere, but there are enough flashes of brilliance in this first feature from Wong Kar-wai that it's imperfections don't seem to matter too much. He's especially gifted at grafting a love story into your average gangster crime film narrative - Andy Lau and Maggie Cheung have serious chemistry as star-crossed lovers Wah and Ngor. Wah's main purpose in life is to protect his idiotic brother Fly (Jacky Cheung), who is so desperate to prove himself on the streets that he keeps finding himself in deep trouble. You can see where it's all leading, but it's no less compelling for that. I loved the Cantonese version of "Take My Breath Away", and I'm surprised at how well adapted Wong Kar-wai already is to his chosen genre, and how you can already see the development of what we'd get from him in later films.

Next up is Days of Being Wild (1990)

8/10


By The Weinstein Company - imdb.com, Fair use, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=56852175

Clerks II - (2006)

I don't know what to say but...I liked this? I liked this. I'm sorry. I apologize to all of those who have a certain reverence for Clerks and found this sequel to be inferior and lacking in what made the first film special. I never really fell in love with Clerks and have a general dislike for Kevin Smith's films, but for some reason this really clicked with me and I found it to be pretty damn funny and perhaps too solid a movie in all departments to feel as anarchic and rule-breaking as Smith's famous debut. I mean, the circumstances are so different - but I guess some would have liked to have seen the guy try to film this on a $100,000 budget instead of $5 million (which was still considered extremely low-budget for the kind of attention-getting property this would be.) I get it, but all the same it had already been done. I enjoyed this as a regular comedy, and compared to many that are out there it still felt fresh and well-written. It actually made me feel like watching the original again, perhaps seeing it in a new light. I'd read so much hate directed at this that I was expecting something soulless and empty - but it didn't feel that way at all. It has something to say and it's damn funny - I like it more than the original... at the moment anyway.

7.5/10




The Revenge of Frankenstein - This was an unexpected watch. I ran across it on youtube and had no idea it was a Hammer Production. But it starred Peter Cushing and turned out to be the direct sequel to The Curse of Frankenstein. Anyone who has watched that would have thought it put an end to Cushing's character of Baron Frankenstein but I suppose the opportunity to turn a profit is too powerful. Hence the Baron is back and operating under the name Stein in the town of Carlsbruck. He's successful to the point where the local medical council considers him a threat. Having recognized his true identity one of it's junior members approaches Dr. Stein and blackmails him into taking him on as an apprentice. And so the stage is set for more bizarre experimentation with stray body parts being gathered and brains being transplanted.

I thought this was a bit slow moving with not a lot going on but it does have exemplary reviews and is lauded as one of the better entries in the Hammer/Frankenstein catalogue. I did enjoy being able to check off another entry in my Hammer film watching and Cushing, as always, is money in the bank.

75/100