A Clockwork Orange (Your very, very first thoughts)

Tools    





Maybe they should be erased from your memory.
Not ours.

I absolutely love Clockwork Orange, I haven't seen all of Kubrick's films, but I have never been disappointed by him.
2001 is no doubt a masterpiece, but so is Clockwork Orange.



Roger Ebert nailed Clockwork Orange with his review of it.

Stanley Kubrick's "A Clockwork Orange" is an ideological mess, a paranoid right-wing fantasy masquerading As an Orwellian warning. It pretends to oppose the police state and forced mind control, but all it really does is celebrate the nastiness of its hero, Alex.

I don't know quite how to explain my disgust at Alex (whom Kubrick likes very much, as his visual style reveals and as we shall see in a moment). Alex is the sort of fearsomely strange person we've all run across a few times in our lives -- usually when he and we were children, and he was less inclined to conceal his hobbies. He must have been the kind of kid who tore off the wings of flies and ate ants just because that was so disgusting. He was the kid who always seemed to know more about sex than anyone else, too -- and especially about how dirty it was.

Alex has grown up in "A Clockwork Orange," and now he's a sadistic rapist. I realize that calling him a sadistic rapist -- just like that -- is to stereotype poor Alex a little. But Kubrick doesn't give us much more to go on, except that Alex likes Beethoven a lot. Why he likes Beethoven is never explained, but my notion is that Alex likes Beethoven in the same way that Kubrick likes to load his sound track with familiar classical music -- to add a cute, cheap, dead-end dimension.

Now Alex isn't the kind of sat-upon, working-class anti-hero we got in the angry British movies of the early 1960s. No effort is made to explain his inner workings or take apart his society. Indeed, there's not much to take apart; both Alex and his society are smart-nose pop-art abstractions. Kubrick hasn't created a future world in his imagination -- he's created a trendy decor. If we fall for the Kubrick line and say Alex is violent because "society offers him no alternative," weep, sob, we're just making excuses.

Alex is violent because it is necessary for him to be violent in order for this movie to entertain in the way Kubrick intends. Alex has been made into a sadistic rapist not by society, not by his parents, not by the police state, not by centralization and not by creeping fascism -- but by the producer, director and writer of this film, Stanley Kubrick. Directors sometimes get sanctimonious and talk about their creations in the third person, as if society had really created Alex. But this makes their direction into a sort of cinematic automatic writing. No, I think Kubrick is being too modest: Alex is all his.

I say that in full awareness that "A Clockwork Orange" is based, somewhat faithfully, on a novel by Anthony Burgess. Yet I don't pin the rap on Burgess. Kubrick has used visuals to alter the book's point of view and to nudge us toward a kind of grudging pal-ship with Alex.

Kubrick's most obvious photographic device this time is the wide-angle lens. Used on objects that are fairly close to the camera, this lens tends to distort the sides of the image. The objects in the center of the screen look normal, but those on the edges tend to slant upward and outward, becoming bizarrely elongated. Kubrick uses the wide-angle lens almost all the time when he is showing events from Alex's point of view; this encourages us to see the world as Alex does, as a crazy-house of weird people out to get him.

When Kubrick shows us Alex, however, he either places him in the center of a wide-angle shot (so Alex alone has normal human dimensions,) or uses a standard lens that does not distort. So a visual impression is built up during the movie that Alex, and only Alex, is normal.

Kubrick has another couple of neat gimmicks to build Alex into a hero instead of a wretch. He likes to shoot Alex from above, letting Alex look up at us from under a lowered brow. This was also a favorite Kubrick angle in the close-ups in "2001: A Space Odyssey," and in both pictures, Kubrick puts the lighting emphasis on the eyes. This gives his characters a slightly scary, messianic look.

And then Kubrick makes all sorts of references at the end of "A Clockwork Orange" to the famous bedroom (and bathroom) scenes at the end of "2001." The echoing water-drips while Alex takes his bath remind us indirectly of the sound effects in the "2001" bedroom, and then Alex sits down to a table and a glass of wine. He is photographed from the same angle Kubrick used in "2001" to show us Keir Dullea at dinner. And then there's even a shot from behind, showing Alex turning around as he swallows a mouthful of wine.

This isn't just simple visual quotation, I think. Kubrick used the final shots of "2001" to ease his space voyager into the Space Child who ends the movie. The child, you'll remember, turns large and fearsomely wise eyes upon us, and is our savior. In somewhat the same way, Alex turns into a wide eyed child at the end of "A Clockwork Orange," and smiles mischievously as he has a fantasy of rape. We're now supposed to cheer because he's been cured of the anti-rape, anti-violence programming forced upon him by society during a prison "rehabilitation" process.

What in hell is Kubrick up to here? Does he really want us to identify with the antisocial tilt of Alex's psychopathic little life? In a world where society is criminal, of course, a good man must live outside the law. But that isn't what Kubrick is saying, He actually seems to be implying something simpler and more frightening: that in a world where society is criminal, the citizen might as well be a criminal, too.

Well, enough philosophy. We'll probably be debating "A Clockwork Orange" for a long time -- a long, weary and pointless time. The New York critical establishment has guaranteed that for us. They missed the boat on "2001," so maybe they were trying to catch up with Kubrick on this one. Or maybe the news weeklies just needed a good movie cover story for Christmas.

I don't know. But they've really hyped "A Clockwork Orange" for more than it's worth, and a lot of people will go if only out of curiosity. Too bad. In addition to the things I've mentioned above -- things I really got mad about -- "A Clockwork Orange" commits another, perhaps even more unforgivable, artistic sin. It is just plain talky and boring. You know there's something wrong with a movie when the last third feels like the last half.
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/...202110301/1023
__________________
"Certainly there is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and like it, never really care for anything else thereafter." - Ernest Hemingway



You want to post like me?
I popped it in once. Then I turned it off about 10 minutes in. I'm sure it isn't bad but I just didn't feel like it at the time. I was high too.
__________________
The Freedom Roads



No Apologies. No Regrets.
Is it bad if i have never seen clockwork orange??



No Apologies. No Regrets.
ahah alright ill go check it out!



No Apologies. No Regrets.
IeatDragons? ahaha thanks man



Precious tritium is what makes this project go.
My very first thoughts after seeing the movie was:

'Now I want to drink some milk, do I have milk? It better be full cream

Then my second thoughts were:

'That movie was pretty awesome! And this milk is freaking delicious!
__________________
Oxfords not brogues.



Before It Started: I hope this is going to be as groundbreaking as everyone in the universe has been saying.

After The End Credits Had Rolled: Hmm, nothing to write home about... what is the big deal?



Although I like Ebert I have to disagree with his assessment here. His review is similar to Fight Club where he claims both films are sickening and try and masquerade as something they are not.

Yes it's violent and sick but it's the weirdness that makes it so bizarre and great, in a strange kind of way. The language used, the visual images and other stuff create a strange and shocking film for us to watch, just because the content is not very pretty it does not mean that it is none the less brilliant.

I can understand why some people will despise the film and Alex's character but it is his character, so creepy and horrifying that makes the film horrifying. From after the Ludovica treatment all the seasons with him make you feel uneasy and the treatment of him really dose pose some serious questions, we know we are not comfortable with what we are seeing and we certainly remember it, it is a powerful film and one that will be remembered as one of the greats. I don't rate this as high as 2001 or Dr. Strangelove, but I still think this is a great film and is one of the reasons why I love Kubrick, if you took the plots of all his films you would never know that they all came from the works of a different director, those three films I've mentioned are each individually brilliant but are nothing like each other.
__________________



Before seeing it, I thought it was going to be too gritty and unpleasant to watch.

After seeing it, I think It might be one of the best films I've ever seen. God bless Kubrick.



I don't remember asking you a ******* thing!
I love this film, and I have to really disagree with Ebert. Yeah, the film is violent and disturbing, but I see that as just background noise for the true nature of the film, which is the whole theme of freedom vs. control and being in a society that expects so much, yet is disgusted when a sophisticated member shows their true colors. I have similar feelings about his views on Fight Club, but I guess that's why it's called an opinion.



I love this film, and I have to really disagree with Ebert. Yeah, the film is violent and disturbing, but I see that as just background noise for the true nature of the film, which is the whole theme of freedom vs. control and being in a society that expects so much, yet is disgusted when a sophisticated member shows their true colors. I have similar feelings about his views on Fight Club, but I guess that's why it's called an opinion.
And why his is an example of a stupid opinion



I don't remember asking you a ******* thing!
Hey, the man has his tastes, and apparently he doesn't like when violence seemingly overshadows important themes in a story. It seems like poor old Roger can't handle the fact that the violence only serves to draw people in and doesn't interfere with the story (it actually builds upon it)