I was just thinking about the movie, Bubble. I remember watching it and thinking, "Meh', this is alright." But now that I think about it I think, "Yeah, that was pretty good." So, my question is, what's more important? The actual viewing of the movie or the after though it gives you?
I like dumbass movies because they're flashy and have bass that shakes my bum around. Examples: Demolition Man, Desperado, Pearl Harbor, Superman Returns, etc., etc.. I'm not saying I like all of those but they have a certain value that is worth something during the moment of viewing.
On the other hand there are movies that I struggle to sit through and don't really enjoy at that specific moment but later I think about them and like what they're about. Example: There was this experimental video about crows that was basically a montage of them flying around this nasty pond and they were getting jacked by bigger birds. It wasn't that cool or anything but I can think about it now and like it.
The obvious answer is that a good movie will do both of those things but if they don't is that alright? Is it fine for someone to pop in a DVD to burn some time like someone might snack on some gummy-bears or something?
I remember watching Little Monsters when I was little and had the memory that it was bad-A and that there were all these cool effects and that the characters were cool and everything else but then I watched it recently and it sucked. I was more than just a little dissapointed.
Please, expand on this for me. I'm interested in the way you MoFo's think.
- DaShiz
I like dumbass movies because they're flashy and have bass that shakes my bum around. Examples: Demolition Man, Desperado, Pearl Harbor, Superman Returns, etc., etc.. I'm not saying I like all of those but they have a certain value that is worth something during the moment of viewing.
On the other hand there are movies that I struggle to sit through and don't really enjoy at that specific moment but later I think about them and like what they're about. Example: There was this experimental video about crows that was basically a montage of them flying around this nasty pond and they were getting jacked by bigger birds. It wasn't that cool or anything but I can think about it now and like it.
The obvious answer is that a good movie will do both of those things but if they don't is that alright? Is it fine for someone to pop in a DVD to burn some time like someone might snack on some gummy-bears or something?
I remember watching Little Monsters when I was little and had the memory that it was bad-A and that there were all these cool effects and that the characters were cool and everything else but then I watched it recently and it sucked. I was more than just a little dissapointed.
Please, expand on this for me. I'm interested in the way you MoFo's think.
- DaShiz
__________________
MOVIE TITLE JUMBLE
New jumble is two words: balesdaewrd
Previous jumble goes to, Mrs. Darcy! (gdknmoifoaneevh - Kingdom of Heaven)
The individual words are jumbled then the spaces are removed. PM the answer to me. First one with the answer wins.
New jumble is two words: balesdaewrd
Previous jumble goes to, Mrs. Darcy! (gdknmoifoaneevh - Kingdom of Heaven)
The individual words are jumbled then the spaces are removed. PM the answer to me. First one with the answer wins.