CiCi's horror reviews!

→ in
Tools    





I enjoyed You're Next more on my second viewing, but I still don't think that highly of it. You saw it as inventive, and many seem to agree with you, but for whatever reason, I just didn't see it that way. Like I said though, it is enjoyable.

I seem to be one of the few that enjoys the action of 28 Weeks Later more, but 28 Days Later is certainly a very good horror film.



Survivor 5s #2 Bitch
I enjoyed You're Next more on my second viewing, but I still don't think that highly of it. You saw it as inventive, and many seem to agree with you, but for whatever reason, I just didn't see it that way. Like I said though, it is enjoyable.

I seem to be one of the few that enjoys the action of 28 Weeks Later more, but 28 Days Later is certainly a very good horror film.
You won't like my review of 28 Weeks Later then



Survivor 5s #2 Bitch
And here it is!


Film4 loves to show a small collection of films over and over again, and this just happens to be one of them along with its predecessor, 28 Days Later… so after seeing the amazing first addition to the series, of course I was going to check the sequel out!

After the first “apocalypse” comes to a close with the infected inevitably starving to death, the American forces enter Britain in the hopes of stabilising it and re-starting civilisation there, beginning with London. However, after a carrier of the rage virus spreads the infection to her husband, Don (Robert Carlyle) the rage virus spreads rapidly, and with the American forces being unable to contain it, the citizens of Britain must fight for their survival once more.

Positives

The film’s opening sequence is by far the strongest point of this film. It features events running concurrently with the first film, and it manages to successfully replicate the terror, hyperactivity, and that overwhelming sense of dread that ran throughout the first film. We manage to pity the characters here, despite knowing a minimal amount of information about them all, so much happens in such a short amount of time, and with the familiar soundtrack running in time with the film, the sequence is nothing short of fantastic. However, the film was also going to struggle to maintain this level of film-making throughout the entire duration of the film, and, sadly, the film goes down a slippery slope from here.

Nevertheless, the next act of the film manages to echo some of the creepy and haunting elements that the first film established. Seeing London derelict and lifeless once more was as bizarre as ever, and since we didn’t see the beginning of the “apocalypse” in the first film, seeing it spread so rapidly here was an intense experience and seeing the catastrophic effects of the rage virus was an original and exhilarating experience that was hugely enjoyable and scary at the same time.

Also, you probably noticed that I no longer use the term ‘zombies’ and that’s because of Robert Carlyle’s spectacular performance. It is through him that we are truly able to see how these “monsters” still manage to retain some of their humanity, and it is also through him that we manage to witness their frustration with what they have become. His performance as one of the infected created some of the most beautiful and devastating moments that the film offered.

Negatives

The opening scene, although it was great, almost set itself up for failure, for it was going to be extremely difficult to maintain such a high level for the entirety of the film, and after the virus spreads once more, the film becomes extremely boring and dull. I largely feel this is because of the cast though. I’ve never been a fan of Jeremy Renner, I feel as though he lacks any sort of charisma, and this film is no exception, he had a very limited range and his supposed romance with Scarlett (Rose Byrne) was even less plausible than the romance between Selena and Jim in the first film. Rose Byrne was pretty mediocre too, and I’d use that word to describe pretty much the entire cast (with the exception of Robert Carlyle though) although Imogen Poots is marginally better than the rest, although her on screen brother, Mackingtosh Muggleton, was pretty awful, and I’m not surprised that this is only acting credit.

The writing is nowhere near on par with the first film either, none of the characters were particularly interesting, so I wasn’t so bothered about their struggles in their environment. Unlike the first film, a lot of these characters did not feel real, Jeremy Renner’s character was basically a personification of action man with 0 flaws whatsoever. The stereotypical indifferent and eternally moody teenagers are used, Scarlett did, however, have potential, but Rose Byrne’s acting meant that this was never fulfilled. Additionally, although a military is once again established as being villainous, their motivations for being so antagonistic wasn’t particularly frightening, and considering they’re only on-screen for a matter of minutes, it was an opportunity wasted really.

Adding to this (kind of) the film just didn’t feel original once it got past the halfway mark. The first film had many original aspects like its setting, the sinister intentions designed for the women that meant that the most terrifying aspect of that film was without a doubt the humans and not the infected. However, this film just uses tropes that have already been implemented into other films, for example, the helicopter scene had already been done in a Romero film. However, I will praise the ending, for that was pretty effective and haunting.

Conclusion

The first half is great, but the second half is pretty awful. The acting throughout though is pretty standard and mediocre, with the exception of Robert Carlyle. The direction is nothing special either but the soundtrack is put to pretty great effect once again. It’s quite difficult to rate this overall, and I’m having quite a hard time! So I’ll go half way and give it:




Survivor 5s #2 Bitch
Our difference could have a lot to do with Jeremy Renner. He's an actor I like a lot, and I loved him in that.
Yeah, if I don't like the acting, I can often find it quite hard to stay interested and involved. But he wasn't the only guilty culprit though, (and it wasn't just the acting either) I was actually quite shocked by Rose Byrne in this, I adored her in Bridesmaids but she was pretty wooden in this (in my opinion anyway).



Survivor 5s #2 Bitch

It's Russ Meyer time once again! And fans of the late Roger Ebert may already know that Ebert wrote couple of screenplays for Meyer, with this being one of them. I'm also captivated by the life of Edy Williams (pictured below) too, because anyone who shows up to the Oscars the way she did has some balls of steel, and this is often cited as one of her best performances. This film also marks the film début of Pam Grier (albeit as an extra, pictured below). So it is a film that has a lot of history behind it, so I decided to quickly watch it.


The plot follows the rock band, The Kelly Affair, that consists of members Kelly (Dolly Read), Casey (Cynthia Myers), and Petronella aka. 'Pet' (Marcia McBroom) who travel to the West Coast in order to claim a portion of Kelly's aunt's inheritance (Phyllis Davis) as well as to advance their careers. But upon their arrival, all they find is sleaze and depravity.

Positives

I've never been a fan of music prior to the 1980s but the music on offer here was actually really good, had they been a real band, I'd happily purchase some of their records. Also, since the 70s were before my time, it was interesting to examine the conventions and lifestyles of the famous within this time frame. Nevertheless though, I don't watch films to teach me history and to listen to music, I go to Wikipedia and Youtube for those.

The acting was pretty okay too, considering this was the only substantial role that most of the cast undertook in their careers. I did really enjoy Edy Williams however, she was the only one who actually made me laugh in the entire film, and considering this is meant to be a comedy, she fulfilled her purpose there. However, the husky voice she employed and her extended gazes of intent emphasised her sexual allure and it was easy to see why some of the male characters were infatuated by her. However, when you look at Edy in real life, you'll probably realise that her character doesn't differentiate too much from her role here, so I don't feel she was acting in this to a certain degree, she was simply playing an exaggerated version of herself!

Negatives

I'm a fan of Roger Ebert, and I fully admire his dedication and devotion to films... but sadly, the writing here was all over the place. It tries to be too many things at once, and it just gets confusing and perplexing. It attempts to be a comedy, romance, drama, satire, action film all at once and the end result is a mess. Like with Faster Pussycat you can tell this was made up as it went along, sub-plots are established but then never resolved or are explained by a quick voice-over at the end, which wasn't very satisfying and was actually quite anti-climatic. Another thing that annoyed me was the philosophical rants that were littered throughout the film, it felt totally out of place, and to be honest, it was quite condescending and patronising, it almost felt like you were being lectured by your parents at times, and I couldn't help but roll my eyes and endure it. The dialogue was quite quirky though, and it felt quite authentic, the little anecdotes and attempts at flirting did feel like things someone would say, so I'll give him credit for that.

Yet in regards to one character in particular, the dialogue was pretty horrific. Ebert tries to create another Shakespeare through the character of Z-Man (John LaZar) and half the time, I didn't understand what the heck he was babbling on about. Consequently, I struggled to believe that such a person would maintain so many friendships with such a large quantity of people.

There was a lot of gratuitous violence and sex too, I understand that they were trying to convey the moral deterioration of their characters, but even from the beginning, people are having sex in every room, and the camera focuses in on anonymous people having angry sex as you awkwardly watch on, not quite sure where to look. The violence suffered from a similar problem too, fights were breaking out all the time for little to no reason whatsoever which was a little baffling and pointless.

Cynthia Myers and Erica Gavin are also meant to fall in love with one another (I think) and honestly, you could find more chemistry in a nunnery. These two actresses were pretty awful, and once again, it's made obvious that Meyer only hired them for their looks and figures. I was really surprised by their attraction for each other though, because they looked no different in any other scene they were involved in.

Conclusion

It tries to be far too many things at once, and that was always a recipe for disaster. But with a so-so cast and very few redeeming features, this film is pretty awful, and I don't really understand how it managed to garner a cult following, perhaps I'm not picking up on something though, I feel that way anyway, because I can't identify any messages the film is trying to make, yet due to the complexity of it, it must have done? Anyway, I'm not a fan of this film, but it isn't the worst film I've seen, not by a long shot. Therefore, I'll give it




Survivor 5s #2 Bitch
Oh, I should probably post it now before I forget. In the next few days, I won't be uploading as many reviews as I have been. Because I get my AS results on Thursday and then I'm at a uni open day this weekend but because it's quite far away we have to stay overnight and I won't have as much time on my hands. All should be back to normal next week though, and I'll still try my best anyway to get as many up before that time comes!



Survivor 5s #2 Bitch
Best of luck with it, CiCi. I hope you get the results you need.
Good luck for your results CiCi and have a good time on your uni day out at the weekend
Aww thank you both so so much! And I'm sure I will christine! It looks very quaint



Survivor 5s #2 Bitch


My first ever review was of an exploitation, rape-and-revenge flick, that feels so so long ago now, even though it’s not. Anyway, this is Wes Craven’s directorial debut, and having seen A Nightmare on Elm Street and Scream I thought “ooh, this should be good, I’ve heard about this film loads before” yes, the naive, 14 year old me genuinely thought this was going to be a slasher flick. God, I was so far off.

The Last House on the Left follows a gang of escaped convicts, Krug (David Hess), his on-off lover, Sadie (Jeramie Rain), his son, Junior (Marc Sheffler) and their accomplice, ‘Weasel’ (the later turned porn director, Fred J. Lincoln). When Sadie becomes sick of being the boys play thing, she forbids sex until more women join them, and when two seventeen year old women named Mari (Sandra Peabody) and Phyllis (Lucy Grantham) come along looking for weed, the gang capture and then commit a series of brutal acts on them. However, when the rapists stumble upon the home of Mari’s parents and they eventually discover who they are, the parents take justice into their own hands.

Positives

This is shocking, it is terrifying and sickening, and it achieves this effect due to a range of contributing factors. Firstly, the writing. Films like this one usually jump right into the rape a la I Spit on Your Grave, however, the victims here are forced to participate in humiliating and demeaning tasks such as wetting themselves and hitting each other. This, for me, was more difficult to watch than the full on sexual violence displayed later on, for every shred of their humanity was stripped away from them and it was blatantly clear that they were viewed as nothing more than mere instruments of desire, a pair of legs, something inferior in every way that wasn’t capable of processing emotion. This effectively causes us to despise and detest the villains to such a great degree that you’re hopeful for any opportunity for them to get what they deserve, and as bad as it may seem, you want these people to suffer for what they did, and no film has made me hate characters as much as this one did.

Therefore, when the tables are turned by Mari’s parents in the conclusion of the film, a great amount of satisfaction is felt. All in all, the writing is massively successful in making the audience share the levels of hate and utter disgust that Mari’s parents do, and when the police are totally useless, you find it extremely difficult to condemn what they did. As a little side note, I did enjoy the pun of Sadie’s name relating to Sadism and the Marquis De Sade, although I’m not sure if it was even intentional.

The direction also deserves praise. Craven is able to create interestingly heartbreaking moments throughout. For example, we see Mari’s parents prepare a surprise party to celebrate their only daughter’s 17th birthday, we see numerous banners, cards, cakes etc. all on display which ultimately emphasises Mari and Phyllis’ youth and naivety, so when the film then abruptly switches to the women getting beat and violated by these sadistic psychopaths, we can’t help but be reminded how young they are, which makes the whole experience all the more depressing and bleak, but emotionally impacting as well. Additionally, the ending was directed effectively too, we don’t see certain acts being done, but we are always made very well aware of what is occurring off screen, and the fight scenes at the end were realistic as well, these killers possess more “skill” in combat, so inevitably they maintain the upper hand when dealing with ordinary parents, who are significantly older than them also, yet the more mature combatants intelligence is what allows them to secure their victory.

Negatives

So I’m meant to be the same age as the two girls who were brutalised throughout the film and even I could tell that some of the decisions they were making were huge mistakes, such as wandering into a drug dealer’s apartment. Also, I felt like the women didn’t show that much resistance, especially Mari. If it was real life, I think anyone would be fighting and resisting every single second, and considering there was two of them, they had a good chance of disarming Weasel’s knife and turning the tables, considering Junior almost certainly would not have intervened and Sadie was extremely petite.

The sub-plot involving the police officers wasn’t necessary really, it tried to include some comic relief into the film, but it was just a bit silly, and it was one of the many many examples of humour simply not working within a horror film.

I wasn’t a fan of the soundtrack either, it felt quite campy and it was quite bizarre and off-putting and it certainly didn’t enhance anything that was already happening on screen, perhaps they should have avoided using on all together like Meir Zarchi did in ISOYG.

As for the acting. It wasn’t too bad to be honest, it wasn’t outstanding or great, but some of the performances delivered were better than several actors who repeatedly find work in Hollywood today. Sandra Peabody and Lucy Grantham though, who played the female victims, were certainly the weakest actors, but they weren’t excruciatingly bad by any means.

Conclusion

It’s an effective horror, that’s certainly put me off going on nights out. It’s contribution to modern pop-culture is undeniable as well (ultimately leading to many beloved franchises such as the Friday the 13th franchise, A Nightmare on Elm Street franchise as well the Scream franchise). The writing is astounding, but contains a few flaws. The directing was pretty good, and for once, an old horror film featured real looking blood. I highly doubt anyone would want to watch it more than once either, so it is difficult to rate, because this certainly isn’t a film that you enjoy, so I’ll give it:




Survivor 5s #2 Bitch
Does anyone have any more recommendations as well? I'm so sorry to be asking this again but I don't know what to watch and I'd rather review something you'd all like me to review!



Survivor 5s #2 Bitch
You don't have to apologize and be sorry so much, CiCi!

I'll maybe get back to you with a few recommendations later!
Thanks! I always do that, I can't help it, I even apologised once when I held a door open a while back
And that'd be massively appreciated, you're too kind!



Survivor 5s #2 Bitch
You could stay in the Wes Craven family for a bit and do New Nightmare. The best Elm Street movie other than the original.
I shall add it to the list! Thanks very much