"Filmmakers Are Braver in Bush's Second Term"

That word is fantastic

__________________
The novelist does not long to see the lion eat grass. He realizes that one and the same God created the wolf and the lamb, then smiled, "seeing that his work was good".

--------

They had temporarily escaped the factories, the warehouses, the slaughterhouses, the car washes - they'd be back in captivity the next day but now they were out - they were wild with freedom. They weren't thinking about the slavery of poverty. Or the slavery of welfare and food stamps. The rest of us would be all right until the poor learned how to make atom bombs in their basements.

Production companies, even small independant ones, can see an opportunity to make money regardless of someone's term in office. The stats show the majority of the U.S. isn't agreeing with Bush so why wouldn't they make a movie that goes along with that view. Gotta' make them paper stacks homles'. Verd' to ya' moms - I come to drops bombs.

__________________

It depends on which way the wind is blowing. The president and the government aren't simply an office, they are also symbols of the entire nation. So during times when the people feel it's their duty to stand behind their leader, their country, the big company executives will think twice before releasing controversial movies that might upset the public. Remember when Michael Moore was booed at at the Academy Awards show for criticizing Bush. Today people would probably not even raise their eyebrows beause now everyone is criticizing Bush.