Thanks, that explains why my google search didn't yield any breaking news and I did look too...
While I'm here, I will say it's easy for me to see how a cop in the situation these cops were in, could aim their gun as the suspect was shooting at them with the taser and then the suspect turns as they fire on him, thus hitting him in the back.
In addition to that, I believe it's police procedure to shoot a fleeing suspect who has fired at the cops. So if the shot was in the back or the front it doesn't matter. From what I understand of the incident, the cops were justified in shooting under the circumstances. Though they still should not have shot in today's hyperbola charged environment.
IMO the suspect in Atlanta killed himself.
While I'm here, I will say it's easy for me to see how a cop in the situation these cops were in, could aim their gun as the suspect was shooting at them with the taser and then the suspect turns as they fire on him, thus hitting him in the back.
In addition to that, I believe it's police procedure to shoot a fleeing suspect who has fired at the cops. So if the shot was in the back or the front it doesn't matter. From what I understand of the incident, the cops were justified in shooting under the circumstances. Though they still should not have shot in today's hyperbola charged environment.
IMO the suspect in Atlanta killed himself.
I think if you start saying armed Cops should show restraint when under attack, you're into dangerous ground and this would eventually lead to Police getting killed.
It wouldnt happen if the Police weren't armed but I think there's no choice in USA other than armed officers whilst the availability of weapons stays as is.
__________________
You are vile.