Smart People

→ in
Tools    





Well I avoided objecting to your original post simply because I had already kinda disagreed with you not too long ago on another one, I felt I'd just leave it be. I'll just bail on this thread now, thank you.
__________________
"Don't be so gloomy. After all it's not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock."



How is it not applicable? Both involve judging something superficial relating to appearance while ignoring substance. It's not a perfect analogy, but it's not supposed to be.

Sorry if you think any of this is condescending, but by consistently misinterpreting what's been said, or simply contradicting it, you don't give me much choice but to over-explain things.

Now, if you'd like to take issue with any of the points I'm trying to make, feel free. But enough with these diversions where you brush them off or take offense at them, instead of addressing them.



Celluloid Temptation Facilitator
I don't see the point in circular arguments when two or more people are going to disagree and that's all they are going to do.
__________________
Bleacheddecay



Well if it helps, I for one love ugly people.
__________________
“The gladdest moment in human life, methinks, is a departure into unknown lands.” – Sir Richard Burton