JayDee's Movie Musings

→ in
Tools    





Miss Vicky's Loyal and Willing Slave
mirror
mirror


Year of release
1996

Directed by
Michael Bay

Written by
David Weisberg
Douglas S. Cook
Mark Rosnes

Starring
Sean Connery
Nicholas Cage
Ed Harris
John Spencer
David Morse

The Rock


Plot - Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary was a maximum high-security prison located on Alcatraz island just off the coast of San Francisco. Closed in 1963 it now operates as a tourist attraction. Except for today where it is going to serve as the base of operation for a biological rocket attack on the city of San Francisco unless certain demands are met. The man making the demands is Frank Hummel (Harris), a highly decorated Brigadier General who is sick of the way the Government has treated Marines who died on secret missions, their deaths never being honoured. He has led a group of rogue Marines in taking over the island, holding 81 tourists hostage, and plans on launching the rockets against the city if he does not receive $100 million which will be distributed to the Marines and to the families of men who died under his command. A group of NAVY Seals are assembled to penetrate the island's defences and disarm the rockets, with two unique additions to the team; FBI chemical weapons expert Stanley Goodspeed (Cage) and John Patrick Mason (Connery), the only man to ever escape from Alcatraz who will act as their guide to breaking in.

Read all about it! Read all about it! Michael Bay in great movie shocker!!! Yes that's right ladies and gentlemen, once upon a time one of the most derided of all contemporary directors actually did deliver a pretty good, nay a great film. That film was The Rock, a film that actually shares many of the same elements as his other work - loud explosive action, buddy relationships, half-hearted attempts at romance etc; elements that have generated numerous disappointing entries in Bay's catalogue of films. And yet here however Bay was able to take those facets and formulate a smart, thrilling and absorbing film, by far the most satisfying film of his career.

I don't think that anyone could have predicted it beforehand but in the mid 90s, for a very brief period, Nicholas Cage somehow became the biggest action star in the world. He may not have seemed like a very likely candidate for the accolade but a back-to-back triple bill of action classics propelled him to such a standing. Before delivering both prisoners-on-a-plane film, Con Air, and John Woo's Face/Off the following year, it was The Rock that set him on his way to securing his place in the echelon of the action genre. And while I may not always be his biggest fan I think he does a nice job here with his chemical weapons expert Dr. Stanley Goodspeed, playing him in a suitably geeky fashion with something of a Jimmy Stewart “aww shucks” nature to him. Initially we find the character nervous and out of his depth, even throwing up at the prospect of the mission, but eventually the character evolves into a bit of a kick ass hero with Cage portraying it nicely. His character is even able to overcome the fact that his name sounds like that of a Bond girl!

As enjoyable as Cage is however, star of the show in my eyes certainly has to be Sean Connery who brings a great deal of charisma and character to his escape specialist, John Patrick Mason. He seems to really embrace Mason's eccentricities and the colourful dialogue he gets to spout, and he really is quite bad ass in the film. He even gets the opportunity to play into his James Bond past a little bit with a few nods to his time in the tux. Connery had rather been in career wilderness for a while until the late 80s double bill of The Untouchables and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade launched him back to the top of the A-list. Throughout the 90s he starred in a number of action films, and given his age I suppose he was just as unlikely an action star as Cage at the time. And while I love the 90s output of Stallone, Van Damme, Willis, Lundgren etc these two make for a nice change of pace and a little bit of a novelty. Brought together here they display a nice chemistry in a classic example of the buddy relationship; two disparate characters paired up who put aside their initial differences to form a bond of friendship and trust.

Film Trivia Snippets - Arnold Schwarzenegger was actually offered the role of John Mason but turned it down. At the time the offer came about the script was only 80s pages long and according to Arnie “a lot of handwriting and scribbles and it didn't seem fully baked.” He has since talked about he regretted not taking the role. /// Sean Connery didn't want to have to travel back and forth between the mainland and Alcatraz island every single day, so he insisted that the producers build a cabin for him on the island so he could stay there permanently during the shoot. The producers agreed. /// According to Michael Bay the film would actually have been played much more straight and serious had they followed the script. While filming however most of the film's humorous moments and lines were improvised and kept in. /// The Rock actually had some rather famous writers do uncredited work on the script. Both Quentin Tarantino and Aaron Sorkin worked on the screenplay but without being credited.
The Rock also benefits from quite a strong villain in the commanding presence of Ed Harris as Brigadier General Francis Hummel, a highly respected figure and legendary for his exploits during the Vietnam War. And Harris is a very nice fit, easily conveying the required sense of strength and resolve to convince you that he could really be this total bad ass. His character also makes a nice change from the villains most commonly found in action films of the 80s and 90s. Generally they were hugely over-the-top, crazy and despicably vile; real comic book style villains; see Howard Payne in Speed, Castor Troy in Face/Off, Simon Phoenix in Demolition Man, Andrew Scott in Universal Soldier, Eric Qualen in Cliffhanger, Emil Fouchon in Hard Target and pretty much everyone in Con Air for just a very small sample of the insanity that reigned. Harris' Hummel however is a much more intelligent and honourable adversary for our heroes, much more complex than the one-dimensional character it could easily have been. His intentions, however misguided they may be, actually are quite noble. All he wants to do is get the honour and respect for his fallen comrades that he feels they are due, and for their families to be compensated. It's an interesting concept to work from, a bit more intriguing than the typical gameplan of a movie villain. This approach also plays into the feeling that soldiers are often not given enough help and support from their government, particularly in regards to the Vietnam War of which Hummel was a part. Hummel also shows a genuine compassion for the marines who get killed trying to stop them; that was never something he wanted.

The film has got some great action sequences throughout such as the big shower room shootout and various battles that Mason and Goodspeed engage the terrorists in. However the pinnacle in terms of action in The Rock would certainly have to be its car chase through the famous streets of San Francisco. It's one of the few chases in contemporary films which can really hold up when compared to the golden age of car chases that was the 60s and 70s; a period which produced the likes of Bullitt, The French Connection, The Seven-Ups, The Italian Job, Vanishing Point, The Driver, Gone in 60 Seconds, Duel etc. It pits Connery in a monstrous Humvee on the run from the cops, including Cage in a stolen Ferrari, and seems them bring mayhem and destruction to San Francisco's iconic streets. I know I've said it before but I think that visually San Francisco has got to be my favourite movie city. I just love its iconic steep hills, unique architecture, eternal sunshine and the cool, artistic vibe that the place has. And The Rock makes great use of one of the city's most famous landmarks, Alcatraz prison. It proves to be a terrific setting for the film, one that is really interesting both visually and from a story point of view.

While The Rock may not be as outlandish as many of its fellow action efforts of the 90s, it still doesn't take itself deadly seriously and it still knows how to have a lot of fun. Alongside the bombastic action, the bickering between Mason and Goodspped and the rather witty script we also get some fun little asides in the form of minor characters whose characters are evolved beyond any plausible reasoning for the simple fact of providing a few laughs; I'm thinking of Mason's exceptionally camp stylist and the tram driver who is extremely passionate about his job and the tram that he operates. And who can't love the moment where Nichols Cage evokes the memory of Elton John's classic song, “Rocket Man.”
Conclusion - While it may appear to be just as brainless as many of the other action flicks that proliferated the decade, The Rock actually has some smarts about it. It's an exciting, suspensful and frequently amusing slice of action. With Alcatraz providing a great and seductive draw, the film features some very fine performances, great special effects and Bay at least proves that he knows how to handle an action sequence with some style. One of the primo examples of 90s action.



The Rock... Bay's best film.

Just a shame he went stupid.
You're the one who gave him the directions.



Agree though, Connery is by far more memorable than Cage... even though Cage had 3,000,000 times more screen time than Connery.



Great review of The Rock there JayDee, I knew you'd love it. Like I said I caught bits of it recently and thought it had held up really well, definitely an action classic.
__________________



Miss Vicky's Loyal and Willing Slave
Urgh! Honeykid.

So none of the Cage action trilogy do it for you? How about Cage films in general?



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
He loves Drive Angry, but he's probably scared to watch it. Oh yeah, movies don't scare him.
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page



Urgh! Honeykid.

So none of the Cage action trilogy do it for you? How about Cage films in general?
The Rock is by far the best of those three, IMO. It's watchable enough and I quite liked it the last time I watched it. The big problem with The Rock is Cage and Connery. I mean, Jesus Christ.

I liked Leaving Las Vegas and thought he was really good in it, but he's good in it the way Keanu Reeves is good in The Matrix or Arnie is in The Terminator. It's a role that's made for him. The only other film of his I've seen and liked was Wings Of The Apaches (aka Firebirds) which isn't a good film at all, but I liked it at the time. Whether I'd like it or not now, I don't know. It was about around the same time as Navy Seals, Under Siege, Universal Soldier and those films.

I quite liked the sound of Adaptation, but his being in it put me off and I've been told I'd like The Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans and Lord Of War, but haven't checked them out.

He loves Drive Angry, but he's probably scared to watch it. Oh yeah, movies don't scare him.
I am tempted by Drive Angry but have yet to succumb.



Miss Vicky's Loyal and Willing Slave
The Rock is by far the best of those three, IMO.

I liked Leaving Las Vegas and thought he was really good in it, but he's good in it the way Keanu Reeves is good in The Matrix or Arnie is in The Terminator. It's a role that's made for him.
And yet you repped Face/Off and not The Rock?

Not actually seen Leaving Las Vegas. And do you personally actually like Reeves in The Matrix? I thought you hated everything about that film!



No, The Matrix is ok, it's just that's all it is. It's ok. I just didn't think it was cool or great or mind-blowing or anything. It was on, I watched it, it finished, I didn't think about it... Then the entire world seemed to be talking about nothing else and it was the greatest film in the history of the world ever. Kinda like Gladiator, though I liked The Matrix more than Gladiator.

I + repped Face/Off because I read that review, however, I couldn't face reading another review of a Cage film straight away.



I am not a Cage fan either, especially the last 10 years. I love Adaptation though and like him pretty well in Raising Arizona. I have not seen Leaving Las Vegas yet either.
__________________
Letterboxd



Miss Vicky's Loyal and Willing Slave
And now we come on to the final part of the unofficial Nicholas Cage trilogy, Con Air. And as he is such a big fan I would like to dedicate this review to Daniel M.


mirror
mirror


Year of release
1997

Directed by
Simon West

Written by
Scott Rosenberg

Starring
Nicholas Cage
John Malkovich
John Cusack
Ving Rhames
Steve Buscemi
Colm Meaney


Con Air

-

Plot - Cameron Poe (Cage) is a highly decorated Army Ranger who is sent to prison after causing the death of a man while defending his wife. After being locked up for seven years Poe is granted his parole and is all set to head home to his wife and young daughter that he has never met. His passage home will be aboard the Jailbird, a prison airplane used for transporting prisoners. On this day Poe finds himself sharing the plane with some of the most sadistic and ruthless criminals you could ever wish to meet, or you know, wish to not meet. Amongst the passengers are criminal mastermind Cyrus the Virus (Malkovich), his right hand man Diamond Dog (Rhames) and infamous serial killer Garland Green (Buscemi), aka The Marietta Mangler. And perhaps unsurprisingly given the company he is keeping things don't exactly go smoothly for Poe in his attempts to get home. The criminals seize control of the plane and plan their escape. The one thing the criminals didn't bargain on however was that they'd be sharing the plane with an Army Ranger whose convictions and character will not allow for this to happen.

Cyrus the Virus, the villain in Con Air, picks up a stuffed toy bunny and holds a gun to its head. He threatens our hero, Cameron Poe, that if he moves he will shoot and kill the inanimate bunny. If you already feel yourself rolling your eyes and that you are obtaining an unacceptable level of incredulity, then I advise you to turn back now. This is not going to be the film for you! Yes that's right, we now move on to the third and final part of the mid-90s, Nicholas Cage action trilogy, Con Air. Probably the film of said trilogy which most splits opinion. Many people love it to the degree where it has become a cult film, while just as many people if not more think it's preposterous rubbish. And given the moment I outlined at the start I'm surprised it ever got made. I can just imagine people reading the script and this moment producing reactions of “what the f*ck?!!!”

The action in Con Air is overblown, preposterous and outrageous. Just the way I like it! The film's simple plot; bad guys attempting to get from A to B while good guy tries to stop them, allows the film plenty of time for explosions, furious shootouts, brutal hand-to-hand combat and all manner of vehicular chaos. There are a series of huge set-pieces which just seem to escalate throughout the film. The highlights would have to be a massive shootout at an abandoned airfield which pits all of the prisoners against the National Guard, and the massive finale which just keeps getting bigger and bigger. To start off with the plane carrying the prisoners crash-lands right in the middle of Las Vegas on the Strip. You would assume that's the film's climax but it's not, it just keeps going. Cyrus and his buddies flee in a fire truck while Poe chases them down in a motorcycle. Able to leap from the motorcycle onto the truck's ladder, Poe finds himself face to face with Cyrus, battling atop the truck as it speeds through the streets of Vegas. Eventually Cyrus is cuffed to the ladder as it is raised up, leaving Cyrus exposed as the truck crashes, sending him flying through the air and through a series of electrical cables. Ok surely that's the end right? Well not quite. There's still time for Cyrus to have his head crushed by a piece of machinery at a construction site. With all this action the film rarely allows you a single pause for breath.

With its large cast of recognisable stars, many of them associated with the action genre, in a way Con Air sort of feels like The Expendables before there was The Expendables. Leading the pack you obviously have Nicholas Cage once again. As I've mentioned in the previous couple of reviews he is an extremely divisive and often immensely irritating performer. However there is one thing I will give Cage credit for. He never really rests on his laurels as an actor. Some actors you'll see trot out the exact same performance time and time again. Cage however has an array of accents, mannerisms, ticks etc at his disposal. And of course the variety of hairstyles that he has sported on screen are legendary. So when you go and see a Nicholas Cage film you really have no idea what's in store, as scary a prospect as that is. And whatever eccentricities he chooses to impart to his characters, he always commits to them fully, no matter how misguided we might find them to be. So here we get a languid Southern drawl which is so slow it arrives about a week after Cage does, and of course the infamous greasy mullet. It really is quite something watching Cage run; his long, flowing locks blowing in the wind in slow motion.

Film Trivia Snippets - Con Air actually has the unique distinction of having an element of its production nominated by both the Academy Awards and the Golden Raspberry Awards. Trisha Yearwood's “How Do I Live” was nominated both for a Best Original Song Oscar, and a Worst Original Song Razzie. It didn't win either. /// When the end credits begin to roll a message pops up stating the film is “In Memory of Phil Swartz.” Swartz was an effects specialist who worked on the movie and was sadly killed during filming when a rigged plane fell and crushed him. /// In the film Colm Meaney's keyh chain has a little Star Trek communicator ornament on it; a little nod to his role as Chief Miles O'Brien in both Star Trek: The Next Generation and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. /// The film's explosive Las Vegas finale was filmed at the legendary Sands Hotel immediately prior to it being demolished. When the production team heard about the plans for demolition they immediately scheduled a multiple camera setup to take advantage of the event and that actually provides the explosions seen in the movie.
The villainous characters are all very colourful, cartoonish creations that urge the actors to really go for it, to ham it up to their hearts content. And pretty much all of them rise to that challenge. The fact that it features quite a number of character actors certainly helped. John Malkovich is great fun as the deliciously monikered Cyrus the Virus, playing him with a fantastic charisma. Also onboard you have the imposing figures of Ving Rhames as Diamond Dog, M.C. Gainey as Swamp Thing and Danny Trejo as Johnny 23 (named for the 23 women he has raped). As a massive X-Files fan Nick Chinlund works as a superb piece of casting as Billy Bedlam. As a result of his role in the show as a death fetishist serial killer he is someone that I always find extremely creepy. And just for good measure the film also throws in Dave Chappelle as the motor-mouthed Pinball who meets a very unfortunate end. While on the side of good I felt that Colm Meaney was very entertaining as a gruff DEA agent. John Cusack is ok but I feel that at times he seems rather lost, as if he is way outside his comfort zone. The only occasion where the film really drops the ball with a character is in Renoly Santiago's character, Sally Can't Dance; an unfortunate stereotype of the black drag queen character that frequently seem to populate prison movies.

And then there is Steve Buscemi's contribution to the film. Not many films appoint a f*cked-up serial killer as its comic relief, but then Con Air is no ordinary film. So Buscemi's Garland Greene, aka 'The Marietta Mangler', is indeed assigned that role with his weird and eccentric behaviour. This despite the fact that his character is a serial killer who was responsible for some 30 deaths. Who once beheaded a girl and wore her head as a hat across three states! At one point during the film, after the plane has landed, Garland walks off and stumbles across a young girl who wants to play with him so they have the creepiest tea party ever. The camera pans away leaving the two of them alone and it seems a sure bet that at the very least he is going to kill her, if not also molest her first of all. And yet later on we find out that she's completely unharmed and Garland seems to have undergone some kind of transformation, like he has had an epiphany as the result of the little girl showing him kindness; perhaps she was the first one who ever did. And after the film has seemingly ended we get a little bonus scene which reveals that not only has he been the only inmate other than Poe to survive but that he is free and clear and gambling in Vegas. If I'm honest I don't really have any clue what the film was attempting with his character, but for me that just adds to Con Air's preposterous charm. And Buscemi is a great piece of casting as just by being himself pretty much I find him genuinely creepy! You'll never hear "He's Got the Whole World in His Hands" the same way ever again.

As I alluded to earlier I have to talk about one of the film's other star, namely the fluffy, pink bunny. On first impression it seems to be an exceptionally daft addition to the film, particularly in terms of the perilous situations that the bunny often finds itself in. However as silly as it may seem I think there's also a little more to it than that. The film features themes of family and fatherhood and for Cameron Poe the bunny acts as a metaphor for his paternal desire. No seriously hear me out! We have already seen Poe struggle to connect with his daughter and form a relationship. Stuck in prison for her entire life the only form of communication they have had is through writing letters to each other. For him the bunny represents his dedication towards being a good father for little Casey. Which is why he takes it so serious when one of the inmates takes possession of it, “Put the bunny back in the box.” Or maybe I'm just trying to place way too much depth on it in an attempt to justify liking such a stupid movie! And even I can't attempt an explanation for that scene where Cyrus threatens Poe by holding a gun to the bunny's head.

I'm sure that Con Air is seen by many as being completely mindless trash, hitting all of the lowest common denominators of the action genre, but I like to think it's a good bit smarter than that. I think its script is actually quite witty and self-aware, and features just as many laughs as it does explosions. I find the film to have an awareness and almost a self-mocking tone in terms of how daft it is. It takes all the cliches and tropes of the masculine, testosterone-injected action film and takes them to their extremes. I think this is particularly apparent in the performances of the cast. As well as a whole array on one-liners the script has got a series of cheesy, groan-worthy lines of dialogue which are just awful but also brilliant; a perfect ingredient for the cult film which Con Air has undoubtedly become. And as for Con Air's fantastic premise, one that I imagine many people feel is complete nonsense. Well it actually isn't. The film's screenwriter, Scott Rosenberg, based it on the Justice Prisoner and Alien Transportation System, which has the nickname of Con Air. As in the film the plane transfers prisoners across the country. After learning of the program in a newspaper article, Rosenberg visited its base in Oklahoma to gather information which eventually formed the basis of the film.

Conclusion - From its pink bunny to its story arc for Steve Buscemi, as action flicks go Con Air is certainly one of the more quirky. And personally I think it's one of the most fun. I can understand why some people just cannot be bothered with it but I just find it to be terrifically entertaining. The film pretty much only has two modes; bombastic and explosive action scenes, or quieter moments where the likes of Cage, Malkovich, Rhames and Buscemi are all pretty damn great. Just immense fun, pure and simple.



Awesome review (I see this all the time, but yeh ) JayDee and you cover pretty much everything it comes to when I think of the film. As you say I see it as like my 'Expendables' of action films, I love everyone involved however crazy their role, Nic Cage and John Malkovich facing off against each other, famous action actor Danny Trejo and of course Steve Buscemi who gives one of the most strangest, f**cked up, but greatest action film characters for me.

Like I think Ebert says it's a film that knows it's ridiculous and over the top, but doesn't try to be anything else, it seems to be self-aware and where it goes silly it does it well. Part of my love for the film is the comedy in it too, it has some fantastic lines such as "Nobody on this plane gives a flying f**k" and "What's that?", "That's a rock"





No srsly I love this movie! I remember renting it from Blockbuster and chowing down on pizza. Great flick to unwind with and have fun! Which for me, is half the fun of watching movies. Yes we can all appreciate a movie as art, but lets face it, sometimes you just want to have fun!



Seriously, JD, knock off the blunts. They've got you thinking Con Air is actually an excellent film, as opposed to the usual Nicolas Cage embarrasment of a film.