Movie Tab II

Tools    





MacGruber (2010)- It's one of those stupid comedies that crack you up it reminded me almost of a Will Ferrell movie it was quite funny though, I havent seen the SNL shorts of MacGruber but this guy if hilarious
__________________
I'm in movie heaven



I haven't seen the SNL shorts of MacGruber, but this guy if hilarious.
He if? Is you say so.

You seem to be about the only human being on the planet who thinks so, as it got TERRIBLE reviews and almost zero box office.
__________________
"Film is a disease. When it infects your bloodstream it takes over as the number one hormone. It bosses the enzymes, directs the pineal gland, plays Iago to your psyche. As with heroin, the antidote to Film is more Film." - Frank Capra



Well, technically, he did say the guy was hilarious. If he means Will Forte, I think he'll find a lot of people agree. If he means the character, I think some people would agree (I liked the skits, myself). But if he means the movie, yeah, prolly not a lot of company there. Though I wouldn't say the reviews were terrible at all; 43 at Metacritic, 47 at Rotten Tomatoes.



Inception ****

Alice in Wonderland ***



He if? Is you say so.

You seem to be about the only human being on the planet who thinks so, as it got TERRIBLE reviews and almost zero box office.

I'm sure he means the character, that guy, but whatever.
Compared to all the comedies I've seen lately it was the only one that I laughed. Plus I dont watch movies for the gross they make in the box office neither I read reviews



Death At A Funeral


The funniest thing about this film is probably the critical reaction to it. In Britain- the country it was made in- it was pretty much universally panned; in America, the critics seemed to love the 'British humour.' When the American remake came out this year, British critics said it was a mild improvement on the original whilst the Americans seemed to be shocked by the idea of a remake. Ah, the irony.

Now onto the film. It's a black farce which takes place- in Britain, ha ha- at the funeral of the father of nice guy Daniel (Matthew MacFadyen) who lives in the shadow of Robert (Rupert Graves- appropriate for a funeral, hey? Yes, lame joke.), his louche successful novelist brother. It all seems to be going relatively okay until a gay dwarf (Peter Dinklage) turns up with some photos of him and the father 'together'. This was British humour...fourty years ago. If treated as an old-style Ayckbourne/Orton comedy, it's mildly funny, although it takes a while to get kicking off. There are worse things you could watch. So why the mauling from the critics?

The script is dreadful- I don't think I've ever heard such a flat uninspiring script. I really liked one line- 'Tea can do many things but it can't bring back the dead', especially because of Jane Asher's delivery of it- but the rest of the script is just terrible. You see the perfect moment for a really good sharp joke and then you get...nothing. There's an overeliance on the humour of the father being gay which just makes everybody look homophobic (again, you could have really played on that by having the father apparantly straight as a gate and the sons as total homophobes, but that trick is missed). The gags- for a long part of the film, there are only two running gags, although one provides a good amount of farce- overshadow the actors. Absolutely nothing is done with the actors- and these are all really good actors, except for some random people I've never seen before on screen and have no desire to see again. It's a bit like the actors decided to do this on a lunch break or Sunday afternoon or something for a mild diversion.

The parking space joke is modern British humour but apart from that, it's more like modern day American humour (except for the fact that the actors are British and it's set in Britain) or old British humour. If you like British seventies comedy, you'll probably like this. I suppose it beats going to a funeral.

EDIT: Rupert Graves' hair is horrible in this. Just greasy slicky louche...I sincerely hope it was done for the film.
__________________
You cannot have it both ways. A dancer who relies upon the doubtful comforts of human love can never be a great dancer. Never. (The Red Shoes, 1948)



Rain Man




Honestly, I hated a good chunk in the first half of this film. I understand the role of Cruise's character in the beginning, I know that he is supposed to be the stuck up, yuppy, selfish prick -- but he played a#shole a bit over the top to where I almost stopped watching. Once Charlie (Cruise) began the redemptive (I use this term very loosely) portion of the film, I really buckled down and witnessed some great moments, especially their time in the casino. Hoffman really was amazing as Raymond, Charlie's older autistic brother. Was the film worthy of it's best picture award? Probably not. Overall, it was pretty solid though.

2.5/5
__________________
If I had a dollar for every existential crisis I've ever had, does money really even matter?



Dostana (Friendship) (2008)


East meets West in this enjoyable Bollywood rom-com about some Indian ex-pats in America. Kunal (John Abraham) and Sameer (Abhishek Buchan) really need a house. They see a lovely flat but unfortunately the landlady says they only have women and she is worried about men coming and being violent/loutish. So what do the guys do? Pose as a gay couple- apparantly their citizenship in America will be processed quicker that way. But it's hard to keep up the pretence when they meet the landlady's beautiful niece (Priyanka Chopra). It starts off a little predicatably and you start to wonder how far the gag can go. When the film starts on the comic complications, that's when it picks up pace.

Then the second half gets a little more romantic. As the two men have become friends with the niece and they realise how preferable that is to simply perving at her, they fall in love with her. But she has her eyes on Abhi Singh (Bobby Deol) editor of the fashion magazine she works at. Of course, Kunal and Sameer are up for a bit of sabotage...

A whole film about being gay is relatively daring for India. The Western style songs are annoying but there are some fun Bollywood style ones (particularly the one where the mother is singing about the horror of her son being gay). Quite a bit of this is in English and I think it will appeal to more people than the Bollywood crowd. And it should do, because it is actually quite funny.



I know that he is supposed to be the stuck up, yuppy, selfish prick -- but he played a#shole a bit over the top to where I almost stopped watching.
This means he gave us a great performance. Playing the role as a complete *******-douchebag is a big part of what made this movie work.



Heh, I've met the guy Hoffman apparently modeled his character after in that movie, he works at the same university where I work.



Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
Heh, I've met the guy Hoffman apparently modeled his character after in that movie, he works at the same university where I work.
How about some info, if available?

I give Rain Man
. I can certainly understand why people might not like parts of it, but I believe that overall it's very sophisticated and emotional. You can say it was Oscar bait, but at the time, I don't believe that people thought it was any more Oscar bait than the other "important" films from that year. I believe my fave film from that year was Who Framed Roger Rabbit, but I also give that
.
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page



How about some info, if available?
I've been told the story by a couple people I've worked with over the last five years here but I don't remember it well enough to feel comfortable saying too much. The gist is that this guy who works over in the main office was one of the guys Hoffman "studied" while he was researching for his role as an autistic person. Casinos also won't let the guy in, supposedly.

When I was doing some job training there about five years he would come in every day to deliver inter-department mail in the office I was in, and talk to everyone about our favorite baseball teams (it seemed to annoy him that I didn't have one), local restaurants and everyone's birthdays which he had memorized, but that was pretty much the extent of my interaction with the guy.



Now, on to the movies.



The One-Armed Swordsman (Cheh, 1967)

This classic wuxia film was the source for one of my favorite remakes in Tsui Hark's 1995 film, The Blade. In Tsui's version the narrative becomes almost a martial arts version of Pale Fire where the seemingly-insane daughter of a sword school tries to narrate herself into the role of femme-fatale lover for the one-armed swordsman played by Chiu Man Cheuk. This version is played as more of an unselfconsciously omniscient melodrama where the girl herself bizarrely chops off the arm of the guy she likes at the end of the first act. The swordsman is played by Jimmy Wang Yu, who seemingly got typecast into one-armed roles with the sequels to this and the unrelated One-Armed Chinese Boxer series (which includes the camp-classic "Master of the Flying Guillotine.")

Anyway, there is a lot of stuff that is pretty weird in this entertaining and nice-looking old martial arts movie and I thought it was pretty good on it's own as well.





Contempt (Godard, 1963)

A French play-write is hired by a big-headed, obnoxious American producer to rewrite the screenplay for a troubled Fritz Lang film of The Odyssey. Meanwhile he has trouble of his own with his ultra-sexy wife, who inexplicably started hating him sometime between when he woke up and when he got offered the writing gig. Much of the movie is taken up by their bickering, and bickering about their bickering, and so on in a sort of helpless self-referential morass that is reflected in the generally frustrating and opaque film-making experience Godard seems to lament in this film. I thought this was okay, but I probably won't come back to it until I've tried some others of his films.





Cover Girl (Vidor, 1944)

I found this a pretty interesting movie for a few reasons. For one thing it's a 1940s musical with a good dance scene by Gene Kelly. Another is it's a movie that tries to sell us Rita Hayworth and that's what the plot is about, trying to sell Americans a Brooklyn Nightclub dancer as a magazine cover girl. The movie itself seems to want to reverse that because it has her choosing the dancing career in Brooklyn (which I think would have been understood at the time to represent ethnicity and the ghetto) with Gene Kelly over the upper crust WASPy Manhattan life. A couple more interesting and worthwhile things: there's an audition scene early on where Rita seemingly flubs her big break by "acting" too energetic when they want someone demure and quiet to model a bridal gown (funny joke: "I should have known better than to try acting. I'm a dancer.") Later the editor of the magazine sees her dancing at the night club, with a bunch of other girls. She really does have a lot of energy -- a physical presence that stands out from the other girls in that scene -- that may have been very studied but seems effortless now; the magazine editor instantly falls in love with her. This has a pretty simplistic bit about "love" vs. "money" but overall is well worth seeing.



Piranha 3D (Aja, 2010)

A local teen at Lake Victoria (in a fictional American South West rather than the real one in Africa) signs on to take a visiting Girls-Gone-Wild-esque film crew around during spring break. Meanwhile an underwater earthquake unleashes prehistoric, subterranean piranhas into the lake. The Piranhas of course start to bite everyones' boobies and junk. This sort of genre exercise is so thoroughly mined by now that I think it would take a lot more than this -- even the corny lampooning of its own exploitation-status -- to make something even remotely interesting. Scream 3 did a little bit better with the slasher genre, but I'm having trouble to think of any great post-Gremlins creature movies.





The Phantom of the Paradise (De Palma, 1974)

Brian de Palma retells The Phantom of the Opera as a rock opera, with a lot of deliberate camp that I think hits the mark more than it doesn't, but really comes through with the psychedelic finale. It's a really awesome tragic hallucinatory combination occult-ritual/rock show/wedding and by far the catchiest song in the film's Paul Williams soundtrack.

The story of course is an emotionally loaded one about an idiosyncratic visionary composer who just wants the show done his way with his lead. He runs up against Paul Williams (the actual composer for the film) as a bizarre ultra-vain satanic munchkin record-promoter who wants everything for himself.





The Playhouse (Keaton, 1921)

Awesome Buster Keaton short featuring an amazing "all-Keaton" dream show in which he plays every role as well as directs, and writes. The plot is very lose and seems to be just a thematic rack on which to hang lots and lots of innovative gags. For a 21-minute film there is a seemingly endless list of funny bits in this movie. The two old one-armed guys in the front row, who have to combine their hands to applaud and can never agree on when to clap and when to hoot are great.

+



The Stunt Man (Rush, 1980)

On the whole I liked this movie but thought it could have been even better. Especially the acting which for the most part seemed little more than emoting by the lead. Some of it seems a little too sly and chummy for me, like the final line of the movie, and the war-movie and Vietnam vet headcase stuff is unsatisfying in spite of the lengthy attention it's given. It's interesting enough though and has a few tremendous scenes that exploit the parallel realities of the movie we're seeing and the movie the characters in the film are making (as well as the paranoid fantasy of the protagonist). Could have been something really exceptional for me but as is it's still pretty good.

+



The Innocents (Clayton, 1961)

Extremely effective ghost story that makes excellent use of shadows in building it's mood. Also very cleverly exploits the unreliable narrator heroine played by Kerr who is truly obsessive. I would say this is left deliciously ambiguous as to whether this is a story about sinister ghosts acting out their abusive sexual relationship using two child bodies or whether the ghosts are an imaginative and untrustworthy part of the woman's personal explanation for how the childrens' past experiences have affected them. The ending does seem to imply the supernatural but it's hard to say to what end...

I think I owe mark a discussion on this in his Innocents tread(s!), but after just one viewing I might have a hard time coming up with something that hasn't already been covered there. This one is also something I suspect will be highly worthy of multiple viewings.

+



A Matter of Life and Death (Powell & Pressburger, 1946)

I didn't really get into this movie, which is admittedly pretty complicated. There's a framing narrative from heaven that tells you (I think) that this story takes place partly in a facsimile of the real World War II world, and partly inside the mind of a fighter pilot who jumps from his crashing plane with no hope for survival. He miraculously wakes up alive and picks up an American woman who he fell in love with over the radio. I think you can interpret what happens thereafter either literally as a visit from heaven or as a metaphoric (and very elaborate) sort of explanation and negotiation fantasy he has with himself perhaps while in a coma. I'm not entirely sure. There's a scene at the end that is about 20 minutes or so and seemed much longer to me because of the clumsy way it squeezes in a political love story that extends the romantic one the movie started out to tell, this time between all America and all Britain. It's interesting but ultimately left me kind of cold.





Green for Danger (Gilliat, 1946)

Another post-war British war movie, this time a murder mystery. Has a cool dark look and setting in the odd corridors and grounds of the seemingly-makeshift hospital and there's kind of a clever nod in the solution of the mystery involving covering colors with black and white paint (I think this is hinted at overtly through narration so it shouldn't be much of a spoiler). The set-up was a bit slow for me so I think I missed some details but by the end it had won me over, including the narrator detective who goes to some pretty funny lengths to rile his suspects up (and let them know he's doing so).

+



The Club of the Laid Off (Barta, 1989)

At first it seemed like this Czech stop motion mannequin movie (about 25 minutes I think) was going to be like some of Jan Svankmajer's more anal exercises in repetition but it actually went in a pretty good and unexpected direction. There's some pretty sad and funny stuff in this short "actorless" film.

-

I also watched two discs from vol.3 of the Looney Toons golden collection



which has cartoons from the 30s, 40s and 50s that vary a lot in entertainment.

A couple faves include Hare Tonic (where Bugs tricks Elmer Fudd and the audience into thinking we have Rabbititis) and A Hare Grows in Manhattan. Some of the 50s tv parody episodes such as The Honey-Mousers and The Mouse That Jack (Benny) Built weren't as interesting for me.



Heh, not really related to my previous post but I also am friends with a woman who has done Chinese Calligraphy Scrolls for various movies, including War (2007) starring Jet Li. Now she teaches the History of Math and Science at Harvard...

Now, on to the movies.









A Matter of Life and Death (Powell & Pressburger, 1946)

I didn't really get into this movie, which is admittedly pretty complicated. There's a framing narrative from heaven that tells you (I think) that this story takes place partly in a facsimile of the real World War II world, and partly inside the mind of a fighter pilot who jumps from his crashing plane with no hope for survival. He miraculously wakes up alive and picks up an American woman who he fell in love with over the radio. I think you can interpret what happens thereafter either literally as a visit from heaven or as a metaphoric (and very elaborate) sort of explanation and negotiation fantasy he has with himself perhaps while in a coma. I'm not entirely sure. There's a scene at the end that is about 20 minutes or so and seemed much longer to me because of the clumsy way it squeezes in a political love story that extends the romantic one the movie started out to tell, this time between all America and all Britain. It's interesting but ultimately left me kind of cold.

I believe it was originally intended as a propaganda film to keep relations between the Brits and the Americans good. Not my fave Powell and Pressburger but still worth a watch.



I believe it was originally intended as a propaganda film to keep relations between the Brits and the Americans good. Not my fave Powell and Pressburger but still worth a watch.
I also read that about the movie's British/American relations charter on IMDB. I didn't think it was a bad movie but so far it might be my least favorite of their films, including some of their other "propaganda" ones like The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp and A Canterbury Tale.

Other than The Red Shoes which I've seen at least 4 times I'd have to go back and re-watch the rest of their films to really know what my favorites are though.




The Stunt Man (Rush, 1980)

On the whole I liked this movie but thought it could have been even better. Especially the acting which for the most part seemed little more than emoting by the lead. Some of it seems a little too sly and chummy for me, like the final line of the movie, and the war-movie and Vietnam vet headcase stuff is unsatisfying in spite of the lengthy attention it's given. It's interesting enough though and has a few tremendous scenes that exploit the parallel realities of the movie we're seeing and the movie the characters in the film are making (as well as the paranoid fantasy of the protagonist). Could have been something really exceptional for me but as is it's still pretty good.

+

I think The Stunt Man is an allegorical masterpiece with so many great sequences - the horrified crowd of beach spectators being a particular highlight. I know what you mean by the the Vietnam vet stuff, but I just took it as back story for Railsback's character Cameron; an explanation for the possibility that he's completely mad and trapped between contrasting realities. Peter O'Toole is magnificently charming and devilish as the megalomaniac director, and I like the idea that he offers Cameron redemption through complete exploitation and manipulation; that to me is pretty ironic. At least that's my take on it, but I'm only really scratching the surface.

Hey what's all this two and a half average score for A Matter of Life and Death nonsense? Surely you jest.



I realize that this is cherry-picking but the "most romantic film ever made" (quoting myself) left you cold? When I have more time, I'll discuss some of the others.
Hey mark, I'd like to hear which others you'd like to discuss, and hope this response doesn't distract you from that too much.

I almost cherry picked you in rebuttal (old habits etc.) but actually you're right "Left me cold" probably isn't the right phrase to describe my problems with that movie, but I also can't really think of a better one after just one viewing.

Sure it's romantic but how many people do you expect to fully buy the bit about proving to the spirit of an 18th century American jingoist that a Brit and an American really can love each other, in a court room in heaven, using a tear as evidence? I mean I can almost buy it myself when I write it down but not with the straight face that movie seems to call for.

I think I came close to shedding a tear myself at the very beginning of the movie so I won't write it off. I also enjoyed the scene where the pilot first meets the French angel and a few others really stood out.