Rotten (Rhoten's) Review

→ in
Tools    





Unregistered Illegal User
Well i am going to try my hand at reviewing movies. I am in no way a film expert nor am i going to pretend that i am any good at reviewing, i just love watching movies and thought that should be enough license to share my opinions on the subject. Feel free to let me know your thoughts. I promise i welcome criticism and i am more than happy to learn from anyone who has something to share.


Samurai Champloo


The series kicks up sometime during Edo period when Japan was on the cusp of great change resisting from the European influences even as its people slowly borrowed from it. Old ways were dying and new trends hadn't yet been accepted. Champloo's vision of Japanese history is a skewed one indeed. Amidst all the chaos a story of three travelers is about to break out.



"A young lady named Fuu is working as a waitress in a tea house when she is harassed by a band of ruffians. Another customer, Mugen, offers to take care of them in exchange for food, but ends up instigating a brawl. Jin, a stoic young ronin in samurai garb, enters the tea house in the midst of the fight. Mugen attacks Jin after he proves to be a worthy opponent and they begin fighting one another, ignoring a fire that started during the brawl. They both faint from smoke inhalation. When they awaken, they find they have been arrested for the murder of Shibui Tomonoshina, the magistrate's son who had burned to death in the fire, and are to be executed. With help from Fuu, they escape and Fuu asks them to travel with her to find "the samurai who smells of sunflowers," a mysterious man Fuu can give little description of, but who she insists she must find. They agree to join her, with Fuu making only one condition: they are not to duel one another until the journey is done." (Wikipedia)

So they set off on their journey provided that a chi wielding shaolin swordsman, ghetto pirates, Dutchmen invaders, mind shaft zombies, beat-boxing delinquents, skin head tigers, Spanish missionaries, the new your Yankees or a whore house cutthroat counterfeiters don't do them away first.

On the technical side of things Champloo is actually not always a visual marble but this is covered up very well. The characters go off model fairly often and the animation can be limited and kinda sloppy every now and again, but for the most part the animators put attention to details where it mattered and took short cuts when it was less noticeable remaining strong throughout instead of starting strong and getting crappy. Besides those few inconsistencies the art direction in Champloo is gorgeous full of thick dark strokes striking locale, and most of all constant perfect use of lighting to strike the mood. The use of colour and shading in Champloo is ever present and totally amazing.

Musically Champloo relies on the heavy down beats of Hip hop, rap even a little reggae played on both modern and traditional instruments. Its a strange blend to be sure but even stranger is how the music is used. As if determined to abrade the norm even in its soundtrack Champloo plays weird music in weird place - a soulful ballade might play when a pack of thugs is being slaughtered and an eerie broken turntable mix might occur during a sensitive moment and intense drum loops might pound in when there is nothing on screen but a thick male biding tension in the air. Of course what really matters is does it work? Every time! the director Shinichirō Watanabe is somewhat of anime genius and he knows what he is doing but its definitely unusual.

Vocally Champloo works equally well in both languages and its certainly hard to determine which one would be more appropriate to watch in if you think about it. On the one hand this is a period piece thick with Japanese culture so you would think it would be better to watch it in Japanese but on the other hand, it's also jam packed with western element, slangs and style. Its a dichotomy split much like the characters of the traditional Jin and the unhinged Mugen and it really just comes down to personal preference as they both work well.

Some people view Champloo as a parody of chambara films (combat based samurai films). But i don't think its so much of a parody, rather, a gumbo. The word 'Champloo' is a short hand for goya champuru which is a stir fry dish and it simply means to hash up. Wata who previously directed Cowboy BeeBob has a Tarantinoesque fixation on deriving new visions from bizarre blends of reality and extreme pop culture. He prefer to see the waning days of the samurai not as a time of dying nobilities and traditions but a rough and chaotic period where the wondering warriors were more like inter city mobsters, which may be a little closer to the truth in the same way Americans glorify cowboys as heroes. But Champloo exaggerates Watanabei's vision into an anachronism extreme. Fuu's nail polish is an anachronism, Jin's Bi-focal is an anachronism and Mugen's very existence is an anachronism.

Logically Champloo does not make sense at all. Champloo is entirely composed of vignettes of its own style, funny, dramatic, parodic or pensive that often focus on blending a historical event or element with modern trends and references giving it something you have never seen before. If nothing else this is a smart attention getting bundle of stories. The downside to this is the bundling of stories and not at all the stories that gets your attention. Champloo is all about style over substance. With maybe a few exceptions all of Champloo's anecdotes are simple enough to be summarized into two sentences, sometimes even one. They are gripping and impressive in execution but fall flat narratively, always cliched and overly simplistic and never able to form a lasting impression on a deeper level.

The characters are lovable but also pretty shallow not stretching much pass the stereotype you pegged them for from episode one. They do get a little back story, they become more of a family but its nothing we haven't seen done much better before. For the most part they don't really change. But still that's not so bad, the worst part of all of these is that Champloo does feel like it has a message to share with us. But then again its the simplest and the most hackneyed message out there delivered in the simplest and most hackneyed way possible.

In my opinion Champloo is significant but hard to care about. Champloo is sort of like a hit hip hop single into itself - maybe there is almost nothing to it and it should be forgettable but you still always listen to it because its enjoyable, its stylish and its just gets into you and is great a parties ,so who cares about depth and complexities when you have ridiculous fun done right. And that's really all Champloo is, much as it is for our sunflower seeking vagabond trio, its not the destination but the journey that really matters.
__________________
"Evil will always triumph because good is dumb "

Grill me, I dare you!
My Reviews



Great review Rhoten. Don't sound like something I'd watch but enjoyed reading your review all the same.
Looking forward to reading more!



Unregistered Illegal User
Great review Rhoten. Don't sound like something I'd watch but enjoyed reading your review all the same.
Looking forward to reading more!
Thank you, let see if i can keep up with this, i am just dabbling really, but i appreciate your thoughts. There are obviously people here at MoFo who are just way ahead of me at reviewing movies. I just having fun really



Unregistered Illegal User
I know what i am about to write is not probably going to be very unpopular here at MoFo and i am going against the grain on this one but HEY!

Paranormal Activity



Spoiler Alert!



Paranormal Activity is a film made for less than $20,000 and it is a truly visceral experience. No film has made me feel as though i was one of the characters experiencing the events and story with such true intimacy as this one did. The character experience I would most aligned myself to was probably the film’s protagonist Katie, and this is for the sole reason that there is a time lapse sequence where she had to stand still for more than four hours in order to get the shot. She must have been bored as I was. My situation was only advantageous to hers in that it only lasted me a scan of 86 minutes. Paranormal Activity is a shaky cam movie that really convinces itself to that documentary style- it does not even have credits at the beginning or the end of the movie.

So the story is that a couple is living in a house and the girl is supposedly haunted by a demon. And a film like this really needs to demand that its audience really believe its premise in order for it to succeed. However, Paranormal Activity doesn’t do anything to convince with its lazy writing and poor direction choice. I read somewhere that this film is a ‘visual art’ – a crazy notion I know, BUT Oren Peli the director has proved whoever attempted to perpetuate that lie irrevocably false with the brilliant story telling device white text on black screen.



The most condemning constituent to this dreadful amalgam is the fact that the acting is just unacceptable. We’re talking porn star level acting here. In fact if you had the misfortune to watch this movie you’d probably be wishing it would devolve into delicious pornography. But actually the previous statement is subject to debate because the word ‘devolve’ suggests that pornography would be in any aspect less appealing.

It’s hard to talk about shaky cam movies without touching upon the myriad of other ones being released in the last 3 to 4 years and Paranormal Activity actively borrows from those other movies and just regular horror movies too and gives nothing back. There are entire sequences taken from movies like [Rec] and nothing’s done with them.

Some people think that the movie is remarkable because it was only made from $15,000 but you know what I think? How the hell could they waste so much money? They could have invested it or have given it to starving children or hell they could have just frivolously spend it on themselves at the mall. In fact think of what that $15,000 has brought to the human race – multiply 86 minutes by millions of people would have seen the movie or still about to see it and you get years lost to the human race, gone forever.

Let’s take a minute and put this all into perspective, this is a shaky cam movie which by their nature do not use mis-en-scène or montage, so there is no real filmmaking in the traditional sense. There is terrible community theatre level acting, lazy screen play, poor direction and horrible effects; I am not saying that good effects would make the movie more enjoyable, I am just fishing for compliment.

Almost forgot to mention, NOTHING HAPPENS! Now wait a moment while what you’ve just considered comes to a nice cohesive halt and then the question arises, have I just watched the worst movie of all time?? ……………… scary **** huh?



Unregistered Illegal User
Great review on Paranormal Activity Rhoten, I dont know how you could stand still for 86mins, I bet every minute felt like an hour
Babies were born and grew up and had kids of their own and retired to an old age home in those 86 minutes. lol



Unregistered Illegal User
Loved that review, made me laugh
do some more!
More on the way hopefully. I am so lazy though. Word Association is the only thread here that i frequent, guess why lol



Unregistered Illegal User
Avatar




James Cameron’s Avatar is a technical masterpiece, Mr. Cameron knows his expenditures and when you look at the screen you can see where the money went. The movie is a massive scope in a world wonderfully realized by fantastic special effects and sounds. A great deal of credit on levels on which this movie actually does work has to go to Todd Cherniawsky (Art Director). He has created a very intricate and visually stimulating world - his creatures and set designs are literally breathtaking. I thought this new age of special effects has drained away my ability to be amazed but upon watching Avatar I was amazed.

However, James Cameron’s Avatar is also a series of obvious set-ups and knock-downs brought with cliché dialogues and many characters that amount to nothing more than what I would like to call ‘wooden cut-outs’ . Set in the year 2154 the story revolves around a mission to extract a rare mineral (which – its name is so ridiculous I won’t even tell you) from beneath the moon Pandora’s surface. The moon’s atmosphere is not breathable so the humans must traverse the area by equipping oxygen masks or by intriguingly psychically controlling Eywa engineered copies of the natives –the Na’vi. These copies can be used as avatars but by only those whose DNA was used to synthesized them. That is where Jake Sully apparently an ex-marine comes into the story.

Jake is traveling to Pandora in order to control the avatar of his dead twin brother seeing it’s a genetic match. When he arrives he meets an overzealous General who tries to show everyone in the audience how hardcore he is by gargling out ridiculous lines like, “ …after a week on Pandora (grunts) if there is a hell (grunts) you’ll be wanting to go there for R&R (grunt) .” The General then informs Jake although the health care system (at this point I find it both funny and amusing and immediately think of the US health care bill ) has screwed him by not paying his incredibly expensive operation to fix his spine after he got wounded in war, if he reports back to the General and does good work for him then he will be given enough money to pay for the operation himself.

So Jake starts living vicariously through his avatar and learning from the natives and as the story runs its predictable course, we are treated to actually delightful nuggets (pun so intended lol) of the unusual world of Pandora. The movie is very well paced because it is constantly building – first we see the large tiger creatures, then we see the Na’vi ,then, we see the smaller wolf like creatures etc. We are never been shown the same thing twice so each sequence is new and fresh.

James Cameron has made some of the best action movies of all time and credit is due for his direction of Avatar because the script is easily (should I say rather easily lol) could have been realized in far more foreign ways. The biggest problem to me about this movie is actually, interestingly enough, in its writing. The writing is good in the sense that it is very intricate on how everything on the world works – creatures and plants- that is all written very well but the story and the dialogue is terrible. There are some many plot devices and touches lifted from movies The Return of the Jedi and Lord of the Rings.
And the dialogue? Just horrible! The most terrible stock dialogue, how many times can you hear a guy shout ,”….. har har yeah get some (grunt)” before it gets ridiculous? Sometime the things these people say are not even military or native jargon which is just weird, they would say stuffs like, “… sometime your life just boils down to one insane move, yeah man hang-ten!” what ? They’re quoting bad skateboarding lingos now? I just don’t get it.

It’s important to know that the world of Pandora being interesting and wondrous does not make the movie exciting only intriguing. By the time the final battle rolled around I was just tired, tired of all the pedestrian characters, tired of all the plot contrives and tired even of the special effects. Yes! I said it! I was tired of the special effects so help me God! When the music got sentimental and the outlook bleak, I really just wanted them to hurry the film along to its obvious conclusion. Also when this movie’s version of Ewoks came to save the day I nearly died laughing.

But after all that’s said and done , even though as poorly written and at times downright stupid the movie gets, I give props to the sound department and Mr. Cherniawsky for excellent work. Avatar is technically an amazing picture although it’s a bad movie it should be watched for that reason.