[quote=Tacitus;626455] My point was merely that if he's 'allowed' to buy crocked players, isn't that more of a risk than 'untested' but promising youngsters? I'd also mention Ryan Babel. Maybe he just didn't trust himself after that? Maybe he didn't trust his scouts? I have to say, most of his 'good' buys were players that anyone with a passing knowledge of European football could've chosen without too much difficulty.
I couldn't agree more and I think it's dreadful and does little good for their development. I have a real problem with kids football and the way it's run in this country. I think it's a big part of the problem that manifests at the highest level. Hell, look at the career of Joe Cole. He should've been a huge star. European clubs should've been wishing they could buy him and there should've been rumours every year about him moving to Real or Milan. But there wasn't and the reason is, IMO, that we have no idea what to do with a traditional #10. So we've stuck him out on the left or right of midfield.
I'd have thought that, as the new financial year starts in April, it would be included the next year. Is Liverpool's Alonso transfer included?
Yep, the truth is that Portsmouth shouldn't have made the Premier League (in the manner they did.) Something like Blackpool or Barnsley would've been more appropriate.
But City are living 'above' their means in the same way. Obviously they get big crowds and sell well, but not in a way that could sustain their current purchasing policy.
*If Platini gets his way, then I'll be interested to see how long the current owners stick around. That is, if as stated, their aim is to raise the profle of Abu Dhabi.*
They're doing what Portsmouth did, just on a bigger scale. The difference is that Portsmouth's owners made loans, which I believe City's aren't. It was always the worry with Chelsea, wasn't it? They were loans, which Abramovich said he wouldn't ask to be paid back, but it wasn't until that debt was 'wiped' that some of the Chelsea fans I know breathed a sigh of relief (even though they said differently.)
United are in the opposite position, of course.
Loved this.
Some transfer news now, as there's some big stuff.
Both Cole (Joe) and Ballack are confirmed to be leaving Chelsea this summer, on free transfers. The Mail says that Mouriniho is looking at Ballack.
Harry Redknapp was on talkSPORT today and said that Spurs would be talking to Joe Cole as soon as the World Cup was over (well, England's part, anyway)
Robinho doesn't want to play for Mancini at City (which is a stroke of luck, isn't it? ) and would like to go to Barcelona. Yaya Toure going in the other direction.
Chelsea are looking to pay £25m for Bastian Schweinsteiger. While Arsenal are "lining up" a bid for Mesut Ozil, Werder Bremen's young midfielder. An Arsenal signing more in line with the early 2000's, IMO. A good choice for Arsenal.
According to The Sun, Vincenzo Iaquinta's agent has said his client's off to Spurs.
Javier Mascherano will be looking to join Benitez at Inter, so says The Mirror.
Also in The Mirror, about a quarter of the Premier League are after Martin Petrov. Everton, Bolton, Villa, Stoke and West Ham are the teams linked.
Blackpool are interested in making Sylvan Ebanks-Blake their first signing.
Hodgeson and Dalglish are the papers choice, today, for next Liverpool manager. The Mirror say Hodgeson in the next 48 hours, while The Express just say that Dalglish has withdrawn from being on the panel that picks the next boss, so he can enter the race.
Fulham are the latest club to think they can get something out of Phillipe Senderos and have signed him on a 3 year contract.
Mario Melchiot has left Wigan and gone to Qatar.
We could bat around figures all day and it would become as tedious as Ferguson and Benitez's sniping in the press but I will say this - the players you quoted Liverpool as buying are established internationals (yes, Aquilani looks an awful mistake but I'm gonna hold judgement until he's had a pre-season's training), the ones you quoted Man Utd as buying were not. £12mil for an 18 year old in 2003 was a heck of a lot but not Rooney money, to be fair, although he didn't quite have Rooney's reputation. Or passport.
True, but not to the same extent in terms of the net they and the other established clubs can cast. Back when I was teaching I had a kid in my class who was 9 and had been on West Brom's books for over a year. You honestly wouldn't have known it if you saw him in the playground having a kickabout with other kids - he was great but so were lots of others. I wish I could remember his bloody name now because he'd be in his early 20s and surely still playing if he had made it through youth football - the dropout rate is bound to be massive at such a young age, though. 80%? 90%?
The 92-2010 table shows Utd with the highest transfer income ahead of Arsenal, Liverpool, Spurs and Newcastle and as he left in the summer of 09 I assumed it was included.
Again, very true. Tis better to have tried and failed than never to have tried at all, etc etc. I suppose the relatively small stature of clubs like Portsmouth have left them open to not being as picky in who they would like in charge and thus the snowballing sh*tstorm we now have was born. You can't really compare it to, say, the Man City takeover, who were a big city club (albeit one who'd hardly won anything) with decent following and a nice new stadium.
But City are living 'above' their means in the same way. Obviously they get big crowds and sell well, but not in a way that could sustain their current purchasing policy.
*If Platini gets his way, then I'll be interested to see how long the current owners stick around. That is, if as stated, their aim is to raise the profle of Abu Dhabi.*
They're doing what Portsmouth did, just on a bigger scale. The difference is that Portsmouth's owners made loans, which I believe City's aren't. It was always the worry with Chelsea, wasn't it? They were loans, which Abramovich said he wouldn't ask to be paid back, but it wasn't until that debt was 'wiped' that some of the Chelsea fans I know breathed a sigh of relief (even though they said differently.)
United are in the opposite position, of course.
One thing about Citeh's owner has always bugged me. Just how could an average and injury prone Arsenal midfielder be able to afford buying and funding a club such as this? And why didn't he do it at the club where he's contracted? Weird.
Some transfer news now, as there's some big stuff.
Both Cole (Joe) and Ballack are confirmed to be leaving Chelsea this summer, on free transfers. The Mail says that Mouriniho is looking at Ballack.
Harry Redknapp was on talkSPORT today and said that Spurs would be talking to Joe Cole as soon as the World Cup was over (well, England's part, anyway)
Robinho doesn't want to play for Mancini at City (which is a stroke of luck, isn't it? ) and would like to go to Barcelona. Yaya Toure going in the other direction.
Chelsea are looking to pay £25m for Bastian Schweinsteiger. While Arsenal are "lining up" a bid for Mesut Ozil, Werder Bremen's young midfielder. An Arsenal signing more in line with the early 2000's, IMO. A good choice for Arsenal.
According to The Sun, Vincenzo Iaquinta's agent has said his client's off to Spurs.
Javier Mascherano will be looking to join Benitez at Inter, so says The Mirror.
Also in The Mirror, about a quarter of the Premier League are after Martin Petrov. Everton, Bolton, Villa, Stoke and West Ham are the teams linked.
Blackpool are interested in making Sylvan Ebanks-Blake their first signing.
Hodgeson and Dalglish are the papers choice, today, for next Liverpool manager. The Mirror say Hodgeson in the next 48 hours, while The Express just say that Dalglish has withdrawn from being on the panel that picks the next boss, so he can enter the race.
Fulham are the latest club to think they can get something out of Phillipe Senderos and have signed him on a 3 year contract.
Mario Melchiot has left Wigan and gone to Qatar.