Not to bring this up again but I just saw this.
I'm just a little more hesitant to label. When looking at a group, the first 2 things I look at is their stated ideology and their body of work. The proud boys stated ideology would not qualify them as a hate group and their body of work seems to consist of them fighting with Antifa. They appear to be a nationalist group rather than a white nationalist group. As much as we all despise Antifa (I hope) I don't know if I would classify them as a hate group either. They are certainly something, and I am at least comfortable saying we could do without both of them.
I do think the very mention of the proud boys in a Trump/Biden thread is telling.
Anita has caused practically nonstop mayhem and destruction all across America. Leaders openly state that they use violence for political purposes.
The Proud Boys I would surmise is a group we'd be better off without, but whatever they've done it's not in the same ballpark as Antifa. Leaders openly state that they will use violence but only in self-defense.
Trump: condemns Antifa and the proud boys.
Biden and other democrats: condemns the Proud Boys but refuses to condemn Antifa, and claims they don't even exist, yet Biden and Harris helped fund bailouts of some of their members including some very violent criminals.
This thread: let's talk about the proud boys?
Of course we know exactly why the proud boys are brought up, because apparently they are Trump supporters, and any Trump hater would want to connect them.
I'm just a little more hesitant to label. When looking at a group, the first 2 things I look at is their stated ideology and their body of work. The proud boys stated ideology would not qualify them as a hate group and their body of work seems to consist of them fighting with Antifa. They appear to be a nationalist group rather than a white nationalist group. As much as we all despise Antifa (I hope) I don't know if I would classify them as a hate group either. They are certainly something, and I am at least comfortable saying we could do without both of them.
I do think the very mention of the proud boys in a Trump/Biden thread is telling.
Anita has caused practically nonstop mayhem and destruction all across America. Leaders openly state that they use violence for political purposes.
The Proud Boys I would surmise is a group we'd be better off without, but whatever they've done it's not in the same ballpark as Antifa. Leaders openly state that they will use violence but only in self-defense.
Trump: condemns Antifa and the proud boys.
Biden and other democrats: condemns the Proud Boys but refuses to condemn Antifa, and claims they don't even exist, yet Biden and Harris helped fund bailouts of some of their members including some very violent criminals.
This thread: let's talk about the proud boys?
Of course we know exactly why the proud boys are brought up, because apparently they are Trump supporters, and any Trump hater would want to connect them.
The fact is that Antifa, as a whole isn’t an organization by any means. They have no leadership, and really no membership. It’s a collection of like minded individuals who oppose fascism. Fascism bad.
Have there been some violence perpetrated by individuals in the name of Antifa? Sure. I don’t think anyone has claimed otherwise.
But let’s not act like The Proud Boys have not been equally as violent, and in some cases more so.