yoda, you're that type of guy that always wins by adversary forfeiting, right?
should i be calling my lawyer?
i'm not arguing about what's true or not
i'm arguing my perspective of a situation
what i'm doing is like two guys arguing if the clouds indicate that it's going to rain or not,
one guy says it's not going to rain because the news guy that never misses says it wont,
the other says it goes to because it's indian uncle made a rain dance and he never misses as well,
in the end it snows, and you strike me as the guy that would argue that snow is water, so it rained
you already know what i think about the government, so
for me government have to prove they're telling the trued, not the other way around
so what's the problem with suicides? it doesn't matter because it's a harm they did on themselves?
you don't know but you can guess it's hard, even if you're a death adventurous like i call them
a gun is one of the easiest ways for you to commit suicide alongside with poison,
the second one might be harder to get in america (irony)(or not)
and since you see things from all angles (irony)(or not), did you ever considered this:
since health care evolves(irony)(or not), the treatment to gun shots also evolved,
a simple flu was a death sentence, now it takes four days to cure,
that's the same with gun wounds and that obviously has to be acknowledge in your "statistics"
do you fell like searching for attempts of murder? guns related crimes? you might get a surprise
i didn't even knew what the number were,
didn't knew the washington post was larger, i just did a five minutes google search and that showed up
you either aren't as smart as you might think you are or you're just playing dumb,
you know very well that the today's world "playing with money" is the base of any large corporation,
just moving money around, isn't production, just look to the highest paying positions in those corps,
they're already planning the next financial crash because they're the ones who make it,
just like the big banks, the "too big the fall", they show losses, the tax payers inject money
if the owners of those companies are the richest man's on earth, there companies have losses?
on paper i might believe they have, in reality? doesn't seem legit mate
you're probably thinking: "another. they hate us because they want to be us"
nonetheless, thank you for the acknowledge
should i be calling my lawyer?
Except your behavior indicates you do, in two ways:
1) If the truth were not obtainable, you couldn't reasonably express so many confident opinions about what's true.
2) If the truth were not obtainable, there'd be no reason to argue about what's true.
1) If the truth were not obtainable, you couldn't reasonably express so many confident opinions about what's true.
2) If the truth were not obtainable, there'd be no reason to argue about what's true.
i'm arguing my perspective of a situation
what i'm doing is like two guys arguing if the clouds indicate that it's going to rain or not,
one guy says it's not going to rain because the news guy that never misses says it wont,
the other says it goes to because it's indian uncle made a rain dance and he never misses as well,
in the end it snows, and you strike me as the guy that would argue that snow is water, so it rained
I'd love to hear the angle from which "the CDC is lying about its data" is not ridiculous. It's a government entity, and the data spans decades.
for me government have to prove they're telling the trued, not the other way around
Two huge problems with this:
First, as Sedai already pointed out, this includes suicides. My number was homicides.
First, as Sedai already pointed out, this includes suicides. My number was homicides.
you don't know but you can guess it's hard, even if you're a death adventurous like i call them
a gun is one of the easiest ways for you to commit suicide alongside with poison,
the second one might be harder to get in america (irony)(or not)
and since you see things from all angles (irony)(or not), did you ever considered this:
since health care evolves(irony)(or not), the treatment to gun shots also evolved,
a simple flu was a death sentence, now it takes four days to cure,
that's the same with gun wounds and that obviously has to be acknowledge in your "statistics"
do you fell like searching for attempts of murder? guns related crimes? you might get a surprise
Second: you tried to dismiss the numbers I posted because they were from the Washington Post, presumably just because it's a large numbers (I asked if you knew anything about the Post, and you didn't reply, and I'm going to assume the answer is "no"). So how can you respond by citing an even larger one? How is The Washington Post suspect, but The New York Times isn't?
didn't knew the washington post was larger, i just did a five minutes google search and that showed up
I don't suppose you've investigated this claim at all? Or understand that corporations don't pay taxes when they lose money, for example?
you know very well that the today's world "playing with money" is the base of any large corporation,
just moving money around, isn't production, just look to the highest paying positions in those corps,
they're already planning the next financial crash because they're the ones who make it,
just like the big banks, the "too big the fall", they show losses, the tax payers inject money
if the owners of those companies are the richest man's on earth, there companies have losses?
on paper i might believe they have, in reality? doesn't seem legit mate
Credit where its due: I think this is a really thoughtful and mature reply and I really appreciate it. I appreciate the nuance in it.
nonetheless, thank you for the acknowledge