It's a hard movie for me to judge cause I read the premise online which it said was about a photographer who thinks he may have photographed a murder, and that is what the DVD cover describes as well.
So naturally I felt that that was was the premise and that a lot of the plot was going to come out of that possible murder he saw.
But then I find out that the actual possible murder he photographed, takes up really only about 20% of the movie tops, and the majority of the movie is him just being frustrated with is life, and becoming sexually frustrated by the models he photographs. So I feel that the premise I read both online, and on the DVD cover, should have said it was about that, rather than say it was about a possible murder that only takes up about 20% of the plot.
What do you think, was I mis-sold on the movie, and that is perhaps hindering my judgment of it, maybe?
So naturally I felt that that was was the premise and that a lot of the plot was going to come out of that possible murder he saw.
But then I find out that the actual possible murder he photographed, takes up really only about 20% of the movie tops, and the majority of the movie is him just being frustrated with is life, and becoming sexually frustrated by the models he photographs. So I feel that the premise I read both online, and on the DVD cover, should have said it was about that, rather than say it was about a possible murder that only takes up about 20% of the plot.
What do you think, was I mis-sold on the movie, and that is perhaps hindering my judgment of it, maybe?