nah.. really?
It's not a supposition. You may argue that it is a presupposition, but whatever happened prior to the exchange I've quoted is beside the point I was making anyway. You've presented no counter-narrative that reduces to anything other than "educate yourself".
if that's wehat you take from it, then that's what you take from it.
Its just "Iroquois was [insult] before, therefor I'm entirely justified to take petty exception to this."
talking about pettiness...
Facts are facts, regardless of their source.
yeah... facts are not what you want them to be.
My "agenda" should have been clear from the start when I explained it. You've given an opinion and I'm criticizing it.
Your agenda is trying to rough my water. I couldn't give 2 cents about your opinion." Who are you?"
Well at least you think you're being nice.
I'm not the one going after you demanding explanations, am I?
See that's the third time in this post you've needlessly attempted to impugn my motives. Not a very intellectually honest approach to discussion.
You're not being honest. But your motives did come through, despite your lousy attempts at hiding them. Thank you.
That "honest and cordial" bit didn't last long.
You should try it. It pays off.
That doesn't make any sense.
Closed Thread
