MovieMeditation’s Diary Reviews // “Come and meditate with me!”

→ in
Tools    





MovieMeditation presents...
HIS FILM DIARY 2015
total movie count ........... current day count
193 .......................... 206

__________________________


June 5th

—— 1967 ——
LE SAMOURAÏ
—— crime ——



Already by the opening minutes of this film
I knew it was going to be a different and yet delicate piece of cinema


There will be spoilers within this review
I just loved how it started out straight in the middle of what would eventually become a biopic of a killer. And it is the presentation of this person that helps ignite the plot of the film, as well as the plot within the film – referring here to the person he is going to murder, after he has finished smoking his cigarette, of course. Until then he is simply waiting in silence. Like a lion in his cave. I love this opening and how it simultaneously shows us the methods of our main character and the mood of our main feature, ‘Le Samouraï’.

This might be one of the most elegant portrayals of murder excellence I have seen in cinema. Following a hitman with what looks to be a timeless timespan, taking his time with every little detail to make sure it suits his careful routine. As an audience, we continue to tail this individual as he goes through his lethal preparation, which eventually leads to the fatal termination of his top target on his current kill list. All the way from beginning to end, this opening ode to classic crime thrillers feels so stylish and professional, as we see ourselves move sophisticatedly from the smoke of a cigarette to the smoke of a gun. To put it simply, that was a contract kill done with compact skill; contemporarily defining the directorial execution and the lethal execution within the scene; or should I say murder scene. Because soon after, the FBI investigators are all over the aftermath of this odd occurrence, which leads directly into the next part of the plot – finding the killer.

In many ways the subsequent story is super straight forward, while the stylish and classy direction is anything but. Melville never fail to impress me during the entire duration if this film, with elegant use of unruffled imagery and rustic sounds, only contributing to the fact of how organized this organized crime thriller really is. It is like each and every scene is set up perfectly, going from the suspect scene to the literal set-up of our main character. My personal pick for a potential favorite, though, is when two people walk into Costello’s apartment to set up wires. This is a prime example of how to deliver visual storytelling. Not one of these important steps done by these two gentlemen is ever rushed, yet the scene never drags. The sublimely supplemented sounds of his little bird chirping away in the cage during this entire scene is so perfect.

While the story of the hunter being hunted keeps evolving, the tension keeps rising as well. It all builds up into this amazing chase sequence in the subways and around the city. Together with my recent watch of ‘The Third Man’ this scene joins the category for best chase scene I have ever seen; though the one in ‘Le Samouraï’ is hardly even a chase if you think of it, which is also one of the main reasons why I love and admire it so much. This scenario chases our hero into a corner, which once again moves the story to new exciting grounds. All this ends with a fantastic climax, which makes the approach of our main character almost appear like that of a lion on a hunt – slowly and silently waiting, virtually hiding in the open, until he finally strikes down on his victim – only this victim, he had no intention of killing. The movie closes with an empty gun, but carrying a full-blooded ending. Jef Costello had no bullets in his gun, but this film hit me directly through the heart even so, because of being such a bloody well-shot film! This was a hit, man, definitely, and it might even be a new favorite of mine.






__________________________




Well, I think many, or even all, agree that slapping a number or letter on a movie as a way of judging it, is far from optimal, but I do it mostly as a way for myself to remember how I feel about a film, so I don't have ro read several paragraphs to find out.
Thing is that it doesn't make me remember about how I felt because my experiences are multi dimensional and not single dimensional. For me ratings were just a way to rank movies and I rated only in regards to general emotional impact, but there are many other factors at play in enjoyment and/or making a movie interesting. So that you just cannot rank movies, in fact, it's hard for me to think about favorites because there is so many ways that something can work and on different levels, besides raw emotional power.

To judge only by a rating is definitely not the way to go, but it's a small and easy way of quickly categorizing something for yourself or others, so they have an idea, and if they want a clearer picture they can read the review.
It is generally gives a rather misleading idea or no clear idea at all, well, that is what I get from looking at other people's ratings of movies I watched. I says more about the tastes of the person giving the ratings than about the relative quality of the movie, specially when someone is talking about types of movies they don't usually watch.

And by the way, my math example was for fun, so you shouldn't take it as serious as it seems you're doing. And actually you can't "measure the result" in the example I was using, since I referred to an on oral math exam. But anyways, don't think you have to put everything up so nicely and all, because I would bet several people agree that simple gradings are far from perfect.
Grading math exams is actually a precise art what is not precise is how correlated the grades are with understanding of the material that the exam tries to test. Rating a movie is generally much more problematic, good critics in fact even claim that they would prefer to not use ratings but the newspapers wants ratings.

I think it's important to come to terms with your own method of valuing and evaluating. It's good that you, Guap, have come to use words and not ratings. But I think it's different for everyone. I take my rating method very seriously. So I don't think you should write it off altogether. Ratings may be far from perfect, but so are words. In fact, of all the methods of communicating, I've heard words are the least effective. But ratings, like words, are tools. Everyone has their own methods, and they all have a range of usefulness and accuracy. It's important to find what works for you, but also to not dismiss what may work for someone else. Everything has it's place. Look past the words and ratings to the ideas they try to communicate.
I think that ratings are only useful when you are rating something relative to other things that are of a similar genre. And only if you are a specialist in the genre as well, so that you have a good idea of what the movie is trying to do, then you can compare it with other similar movies.

While the more experimental types of movies cannot be rated. Since they are so different from everything else, a movie like Catsoup or Angel's Egg, for instance, are just too different from other things to be even rated. In this case I think that a rating is essentially meaningless because even if it says how much a person liked the movie that would be useless for me to evaluate the film's impact on me, given it's highly experimental nature.



Just let it be, Zotis... Guap has never been one to understand other people and their opinions and differences anyways.

(don't kill me Guap, I'm only half-joking here )
It's not quite an opinion but something I learned. Art is multi dimensional, ratings are not.

You can scream and complain that I don't understand other people but I clearly understand your argument, I just didn't find it convincing while you didn't appear to grasp what I was trying to say.



Wow, please don't start such a giant discussion on such a subjective subject please, Gaup. You're clouding my thread with your single-minded overthinking.

Seriously, if that is how you mind works in terms of everything in your life, I feel bad for you. Obviously I agree to a certain extent to what you are saying, but I still think it's stupid to discard ratings completely. It might be the most unprecise way of judging movies ever, but it's better than nothing imo, though it can indeed hold several meanings and such.

I still think when you compliment your rating with a detailed review, you're good to go. I think they go hand in hand really, because a rating can be explained by a review, while a review can have a lot of negative stuff which may not effect your overall impression with the film too much, and therefore give a more positive rating in the end, than the review looked to be - especially with the eyes of others. In that way, a review can also cloud itself, and a rating would be helpful in that connection...



I agree that ratings can be good information, when one is comparing movies of the same genre or movies that try to achieve very similar things, so that it is easy to see how good the movie achieves that by the rating. Ratings are useful when the rater has specialized knowledge of the stuff he is reviewing and the movie also belongs to a well defined genre, with well defined standards for what the movie is trying to be. When those two conditions are satisfied I think that ratings can provide good information. Many times this does not apply, though.

Just my opinion. You can call it overthinking but it's something that I arrived at after years playing around rating things, like 3,000 movies on the IMDB and critiker plus rating 400 anime series on rating sites, as well as books and manga, among other things. Now I reach the conclusion that I cannot agree with the ratings I gave a long time ago, because these things are too complex to be rated. The range of impressions I have of something is just too complex.



Great review of Le Samourai MM. Just watched it myself last month and I already consider it a favourite. Hoping for a good finish on the 60s countdown for it.



That's all very fine and all. But I still find it funny how you keep thinking your opinion is the correct one. Just because you "spend years" rating movies and came to the conclusion you find ratings completely useless doesn't mean they definitively are to everyone else or in the general sense.

Like we discussed, this is not a math problem. You haven't spend years looking at an equation and finally came to the result. You have spend years doing something that has shaped your understanding of something.

What you are saying, is like me saying: "I've spend years looking at the color red and the color blue. I have now found out I like the color blue more." That doesn't make red an invalid color nor does it definitely make blue the most beautiful color ever.

It's all opinions, man.



I'm glad you liked La Samurai, MM. It's such a great film. It's definitely a masterpiece. It was my first Melville, and it made me instantly love him as a director.

I think that ratings are only useful when you are rating something relative to other things that are of a similar genre. And only if you are a specialist in the genre as well, so that you have a good idea of what the movie is trying to do, then you can compare it with other similar movies.

While the more experimental types of movies cannot be rated. Since they are so different from everything else, a movie like Catsoup or Angel's Egg, for instance, are just too different from other things to be even rated. In this case I think that a rating is essentially meaningless because even if it says how much a person liked the movie that would be useless for me to evaluate the film's impact on me, given it's highly experimental nature.
I rate movies because I enjoy it as an activity. My ratings are a combination of how I feel about the film's quality and my personal enjoyment. I rate out of 10 and there is a huge margin within each of those number values. I enjoy looking back and seeing how I rated a movie in the past versus how I rate it after watching it again. It's not about being right or wrong. It's about seeing how I felt about it at the time. I'm very intentional about my ratings.

Ratings themselves may be very useless in many ways. And you may find that they don't work for you, at least not the way you were using them. But ratings can also be very useful to other people in many ways.



Glad you enjoyed Le Samourai MM.
Personally I like seeing people's ratings, after all it's just a reflection of how much they enjoyed the film, it's not something I'd take away and make it be a reason I would or wouldn't watch a particular film. I can understand how difficult it is to rate a film, I never seem to be able to do ratings out of 5, I always want that extra nuance of rating out of 10, but even then it sometimes feels a bit arbitrary. Anyway I do enjoy reading other people's reviews and seeing what touched them or annoyed them, it's not all about the rating it's all about the text



A huge thanks to cricket, Camo, Gunslinger, Zotis and christine for leaving a comment in here, I'm glad you liked the review and I'm glad that I liked Le Samouraï! I can't wait to check out more of Melville's work!

Also thanks to those who repped the review, of course, I hope you enjoyed it too! Next reviews will be for Lady and the Tramp and Still Alice!



MovieMeditation presents...
HIS FILM DIARY 2015
total movie count ........... current day count
198 .......................... 209

__________________________


June 6th

—— 1955 ——
Lady
AND THE
Tramp

—— animation ——
DISNEY CLASSIC no.15

REWATCH
This is my first time watching this feature film
in the full aspect ratio of a wide 2.55:1 CinemaScope picture!


I certainly loved this film when I was a kid, and I remember the story really well even today, but it was almost like watching the story unfold for the first time all over again. Together with ‘Sleeping Beauty’, this is their only production ever made in that distinctive widescreen format, which is such a shame, because it works wonderfully and is absolute beautiful to look at. When it comes down to the actual story, there is not much to complain about either; it is a classic tale of social differences and how love conquers all, but obviously with that added essence of delightful Disney dreamscapes, which I love escaping into and watch the world of animation come to life…

For every dog lover out there, this is a great tail of romance, spelling mistake intended, and a fun view into what happens when two worlds collide with each other. This social impact sets off an impressing and admirable adventure of two animals on a journey to new understandings. They have no idea how to behave in the world on the other side of the fences, whether that means spending time in fine gardens or with vicious wardens. ‘Lady and the Tramp’ is a fun and insightful journey into the life of a dog, which is obviously told in a way that can be put into perspective, in several different ways. It also gives us the bare bones view into the miserable life of strait dogs, which is often a factor that is overlooked, especially if you live in a peaceful and quiet neighborhood, like Lady.

With this wonderful film you don’t have to bone up on your knowledge of dogs, social classes or anything of that matter… The story is pure and simple, made with careful and creative hands, which helps make the stunning animation come to life. The animators and story supervisors have dug deep and all the way into the bone, to dig out the purest form of close-to-heart storytelling they could find. The film has a slow and yet playful tempo, which ends in a classic tear-jerking moment from Disney, followed by a sweet and heartfelt ending. The story isn’t perfectly done all the way through, but there is enough great stuff to have the good and bad meet in the middle – exactly like it is the case with a certain famous scene from this film… In some way it is kind a bummer the story wasn’t just a bit repetitive, so I could have talked about how the film was chasing its own tail… Oh well, nevertheless, I will still end it on a playful note after all, because truly, this film’s a treat!






__________________________




2022 Mofo Fantasy Football Champ
I always have wondered how that film would hold up. Actually been in a mood to research Disney classics. But I think I'll save films like Snow White, Lady and the Tramp, and Peter Pan for post animated musical HOF



Dog Puns!!! Honestly I think Lady & Tramp, like most of that era of Disney films, was nice and pleasant but not great. The animation is really good, not quite as good as Sleeping Beauty but the character design is excellent.



Dog Puns!!! Honestly I think Lady & Tramp, like most of that era of Disney films, was nice and pleasant but not great. The animation is really good, not quite as good as Sleeping Beauty but the character design is excellent.
agreed.

Sleeping Beauty is perhaps Disney's most artistically beautiful work. the concepts of shapes and colors are amazing.



It's the one that Disney himself did the least work with. He wanted to go against his style after criticism that all of his 50s movies were visually the same.



MovieMeditation presents...
HIS FILM DIARY 2015
total movie count ........... current day count
199 .......................... 211

__________________________


June 7th

—— 2014 ——
S T I L L
A L I C E

—— drama ——
EXTENDED REVIEW


Ironically enough, this film centered on Alzheimer’s disease,
was ultimately a forgettable experience for me


It is one of those films, which attempts to portray a long lasting element, but shamefully chooses to fast-forward through most of it, thereby highlighting every highpoint, but leaving out the smaller and more impactful moments... It is a shame, because the subtle scenes that made it into the film, are all great. But with that said, without someone like Julianne Moore to be in the center of these scenes, it wouldn’t have been nearly as great. This film makes many wrong moves, like banally blurring out the entire background, while the lead character is left in the front with few things to play with. Though this is mostly meant in a metaphorical sense, I do understand the literal purpose of this, trying to create disorientation and make Alice's mind present itself through visuals, but it just feels forced and overused to me. It feels like they have tried to create a strong center core to the film, being Alice, and then left everything else around her generally incomplete. The other characters are merely insignificant additions, like, say, the page numbers in a book. You understand why they are there, and they help you realize where you are in the story, but it doesn’t add anything to the actual context. Unfortunately for this story, though, not even the context is interesting. The story is in desperate need of some weight and substance, other than its lead character… Because, when you try to dig deep down within the story, it doesn’t really give you much back… by the end of it all, it’s just Alice, not much more…

I wish this film felt like something more than bland bait for the Oscar board, but I simply can’t deny that I view this movie as merely worthy of my time. The story is told fairly predictable, the script focuses on the factual rather than the emotional and the atmosphere within it feels cold, isolated and impersonal. And it isn’t one of those movies either, which can be described as depressingly good, nor do you ever feel emotionally invested in enough of what is going on throughout the film. The only element here, which truly works, is Julianne Moore in the lead role as Alice. The other actors and actresses are all fine, but because the script is so surfaced and sterile they are never able to really let themselves go. Not even Julianne Moore is given much material in the first place, if you really think about it, but thankfully she has a lot of screen time and amazing acting abilities to give a stunning performance. I don’t think this story has a lot going for it on its own, but with Julianne Moore you are at least invested in some shape or form. I will say, that in the film, there is a fair amount of potential to be spotted, but without Moore, there is little to be fulfilled.

With all that said though, I do love how the film wants to raise awareness towards Alzheimer’s disease, which is obviously a great thing to do. But unfortunately, the awareness is only a current cure to the otherwise bad side effects of this movie, since the strong moments pass by like small individual impulses – powerful but ultimately forgettable impulses. I connected the most with the really sudden scenes of truly depressing measures; those that wasn’t just by the books; those that couldn’t be read within the script; those of which came from nothing but phenomenal acting. Julianne Moore wasn’t even crying her heart out through the entire film or anything of that matter, yet her performance is extremely powerful. It was the raw emotion, which came from her empty appearance and the subtle yet distinctive gestures, that made this performance anything but forgettable. It is definitely Julianne Moore who carries every little fragment of this film; every little concept or idea. Throughout the film, she has a constant look of emptiness in her face, like the person inside is no longer present. A look of confusion and despair, like her brain and body just don’t talk to each other anymore. A sense of her body trying to cover up the mess, made by her mind, which results in uncomfortable situations of a smart woman trying to understand simple things. And It is frighteningly effective.

This reminds me, that I loved the first sign we ever saw of the disease approaching. She was doing this presentation in front of a class, when suddenly she stopped for moment, glanced out into the room, until she continued shortly after like nothing had happened. Obvious but subtle. I personally think it worked well. But when the disease finally begins to leave its marks, the script gets filled with wise words of wisdom, spoken with a scientific touch rather than an emotional one. I know both the husband and wife are smart and intelligent human beings, but I’m not interested in the facts, I’m interested in the fiction because that is what I’m watching. I want to see the tools of moviemaking being worked like magic. This is not a film based on a true story, I don’t need the formal facts, nor do I need the cold hands of a doctor leading me through the mind of this individual. So when the person is finally left alone to walk her own ways, that is exactly where we connect with the character. When Alice has a hard time getting through life at the simplest of grounds, that is where we notice the struggle and understand the pain.

The simple things – like knowing your way around your own house or identifying your closest family and friends – those will hit you like a brick, because you couldn’t even imagine not being capable of doing such simple things yourself… and watching Alice blaming herself for these things will hit you hard, while seeing others blaming Alice for it will hit you even harder… This does sometimes hint at something more than “just Alice”… like there is a slight growth within other characters, or like the story actually seems to show a small sign of progress... But when you try to dig deep down within the story, it doesn’t really give you much back… by the end of it all, it’s still Alice, not much more.






__________________________




MovieMeditation presents...
HIS FILM DIARY 2015
total movie count ........... current day count
199 .......................... 211

__________________________


June 8th

—— 2007 ——
1408
—— horror ——
REWATCH


Even if you leave this room,
you can never leave this room...


Review from my horror list
This haunting Stephen King adaption was actually a key element to my horror upbringing, since it basically created a capacious room for a certain supernatural subgenre, which I still love very much to this day. I recently rewatched the film, which unfortunately didn’t hold up as well as I hoped, but it still stands strong as a great example of a ghost story done right. I also have to say that the reason it may have worked to a lesser extent, was because I watched the director’s cut, which was the version I initially fell in love with, though I don’t know if I would prefer the original cut today...

The story of the main character is honestly not too interesting, though I do think John Cusack was an interesting choice for the lead role, and obviously Samuel L. Jackson is great as the persistent owner of The Dolphin. But it isn’t until Cusack’s character arrive in the actual hotel room, that things truly start to become interesting. The director really did a great job at making the room feel like the actual antagonist, which constantly tries to break down the very mentality of the character. Tons of interesting mind trickery and mutilated imaginations make for some great and gruesome fun, which ultimately is quite frightening too; at least in my opinion. I did find the middle part to be the best, while the film began to get a bit too much towards the end, unfortunately, ending up confused in its own furious infusion. It couldn’t really keep up with itself by then, but it still doesn’t change that I think this is a fun film and one that I enjoy watching time and time again.

Scary good fun with John Cusack in a very different kind of role. But honestly, it isn’t him who are the main character if you ask me; it is room 1408. So much crazy stuff happens throughout this film and it can almost keep you interested throughout the entire runtime. After a rewatch, I will say this just doesn't do it for me the way it used to, but some scenes in this film are still very creepy and extremely well done. The amazing atmosphere and twisted story is key to this film, and it is ultimately what keeps me from checking out too early...




__________________________