Rodent's Reviews

→ in
Tools    





Review #204, Movie #274

Chopper


Year Of Release
2000

Director
Andrew Dominik

Producer
Michele Bennett

Writer
Mark Chopper Read, Andrew Dominik

Cast
Eric Bana, Vince Colosimo, Simon Lyndon, Kate Beahan, David Field

Notes
Eric Bana's debut film propelled him to stardom. But the film had a few setbacks.
One was during the prison scenes as the prison itself was going to be shut down during negotiations between the filmmakers and the prison itself. As a result, the funding was pulled and held back the start date for shooting. We almost didn't get Bana's career making breakthrough.

Also, the film's stylised visuals were purposely made in such a way that the sterile prison seen in the first half, and the overly colourful second half of the film, would give stark contrasts to one another and added an incredible sense of paranoia and chaos, or sterile correctional facility order, in the audience's head depending on the scene.

---

Australian criminal Mark Brandon Read, aka Chopper, flitting between petty theft and minor assault, to kidnap, violent robbery and even murder, Mark makes a name for himself over time in the 1980s and 1990s... eventually making enemies everywhere he goes by beating, torturing, robbing and murdering drug dealers, gang members and junkies...

... and becoming one of the most wanted men in Australian history, both by the law and from warring factions of gangs and petty criminals to even his friends that he's crossed.

---


An incredibly unsettling turn of acting from Eric Bana brings to life what appears on the surface as a far out and occasionally excessive brutal story of crime and punishment.

Look a little deeper though, Chopper is a relatively complex nest of boxes that is easy to follow and never fails to impress no matter how many times you see it.
One thing the film manages to do is cross fantasy with reality very successfully.

Labelled as a Biopic, the film is more of a Biography crossed with some hokum and make-believe that gives the impression that the input from Chopper Read himself played a part in the production.
It also adds weight to Chopper's character too. Throughout the film he flits from lying through his teeth and making up fantastic stories, to telling the truth no matter how bizarre it may sound and the overall playfulness with the script adds a brilliant depth to the story and Chopper's overall character.

The way the character is unravelled is also well written, and his rise to fame is shown in small detail, but it's still a recognisable turn of events when shown.
The lengths the guy would go to is shown in detail too. Including removing certain body parts to get what he wants.

The film is also incredibly funny at times, especially the dialogue involved and the delivery from the cast.
There are numerous situations when the realistic tones of the film shine even more when the dialogue is laid on in a humorous fashion.
All of it is from Bana too and his naturalistic presence and approach to the role makes it all the more potent.

There are some other scenes of violence throughout though that are occasionally gory. Particularly when Chopper himself gets stabbed that some people may find a little too realistic and almost stomach churning, but it's definitely not a fault, it makes the film more heavy hitting in terms of tone.


Eric Bana in the title role of Chopper absolutely makes this film though. Being the title role, you'd automatically think that. Bana actually spent time with the twitchy and unstable Mark Read in real life on Mark's farm in the Outback so he could study Mark and his characteristics...
It really shows too.
Bana is incredibly unnerving, even disturbing to watch at times and you can see something behind his eyes when the character starts getting "itchy" when he finds himself in situations he doesn't like.
As I said above, he hits the nail on the head with the humour too.
Bana also rocks the physical side of the role. Depending on the scene, 1980s or 1990s etc, Bana goes from unassuming criminal to an overweight thug to a beefed up muscleman and it makes the character development even more enjoyable to watch.

Back up comes from Vince Colosimo, Simon Lyndon and Kate Beahan. They all make an impression, even though none of them are onscreen for very long. The film really is all about Mark Read and his adventures.


---


All in all, not much else to say about it. Highly engaging storywise, full of character and characters, great writing and very funny too in between the sombre psychological thrills that come from Bana's immense acting.

Highly recommended.

My Rating: 93%


This movie is also one of my favorites, perhaps because I can relate to some traits of the main character. This biopic is a combo documentary style, which makes it somewhat unique.
Your review is spot on!



Yeah, it's the fantasy side of the story, most of it from Read and the fact he was a bullsh*t artist that makes the film more interesting.

I couldn't believe how funny it was as well. I was expecting a hardcore violent film but it's laced with subtle humour and stunning visuals.



Yeah, it's the fantasy side of the story, most of it from Read and the fact he was a bullsh*t artist that makes the film more interesting.

I couldn't believe how funny it was as well. I was expecting a hardcore violent film but it's laced with subtle humour and stunning visuals.
True that! It's all what makes this movie so enjoyable. I love dramedies but they are so hard to pull off successfully.



Ok... on a '5' at the mo so may as well make it a special one... and use my new stamps too...
Review #205, Movie #275
Pan's Labyrinth
El Laberinto Del Fauno



Year Of Release
2006

Director
Guillermo Del Toro

Producer
Guillermo Del Toro, Alfonso Cuaron, Bertha Navarro, Frida Torresblanco, Alvaro Augustin

Writer
Guillermo Del Toro

Cast
Ivana Baquero, Sergi Lopez, Maribel Verdu, Ariadna Gil, Alex Angulo and Doug Jones with Pablo Adan as Narrator

Notes
Del Toro was inspired my many fairy tales for Pan's Labyrinth... he has even been quoted as saying this was "his Narnia", and with good reason too; Del Toro actually turned down the opportunity to direct The Lion, The Witch And The Wardrobe to make Pan's Labyrinth and the result is something far more special than the butchery that was TLTWATW.
Most of the ideas, creatures and visuals in the film were also comprised from simple doodles Del Toro had made on scraps of paper... to add to that, CGI used to make his vision come to life was incorporated into the film sparingly too, and most of the effects and wonderful visuals were actually immensely complex sets, animatronics and makeup design.

---
Ofelia, a little girl living in the aftermath of the Spanish Civil War (and with the rest of the world enthralled in WWII), has been moved with her heavily pregnant Mother to live with her Mother's new husband the Falangist Captain Vidal.
Vidal is a particularly brutal man with little remorse or emotion (other than anger) who is hunting the remnants of the Spanish Maquis and Ofelia and her Mother, along with their Maid/Helper live in constant fear of doing the wrong thing by Vidal.
But being an adventurous girl, Ofelia wanders into the nearby woodland and discovers a Faun...

... and the Faun tells Ofelia that she is the reincarnation of a Princess called Moanna... and she must accomplish a number of tasks so that she can re-join her people in a magical land and rule with her long dead Father.
---
Simply.
Breath-taking.

Del Toro's creation is an absolute marvel to watch. He's incorporated some of the most special pieces of almost every Fairy Tale going and updated to whole lot into what I can only describe as a modern classic.

The very essence of Labyrinth is a real treat for anyone who has grown up with fantasy films. The filmmakers have made a genuinely hard hitting, heart-wrenchingly touching, heart-poundingly exciting and visually stunning movie for adults that delivers on every front.


What makes the movie stand apart is the sheer detail that Del Toro has put into the film. The look of the world, whether it be at the small town that Ofelia and her family are occupying, the wooded area she frequents or even the more fantastical places she visits on the adventures the Faun sends her; the eye for detail is simply immense.

Not just highly realised when it comes to originality, it's also highly recognisable in the fact that a lot of it is based around Fairy Tales and Fantasy of old and it gives a much more believable edge over other Fantasy features.


The story too is incredibly simple. Yet, so simple it gives yet more of an edge over other films of this type.
Little girl, reincarnated Princess, has to do tasks. That's it.
But then they overlay all of this with Ofelia's family and friends and then create a genuinely frightening antagonist in her Step-Father and back that up with the backdrop of a war.

What you're watching here is 3 films intertwined and written so brilliantly that it's easy to follow... and enjoy the whole lot at the same time.
Another thing that's special is that the audience never knows whether Ophelia's adventures really happened or if they're just her imagination. It's very cleverly put together in the screenplay.


The acting is also incredible.
Ivana Baquero as Ofelia is wonderfully out of her depth in the circumstances. Whether in the presence of her Step-Father, witnessing the war or in the middle of her adventures, she has an brilliant innocence about her that just draws the viewer in to loving her portrayal of the character and her strengths too.

Sergi Lopez is also on top form as Captain Vidal. His quiet unassuming persona makes for a genuinely disturbing character and when the going gets tough, his meaner side really shows through nicely.

Maribel Verdu as the Maid, Ariadna Gil as Ofelia's pregnant Mother and Alex Angulo as Doctor Ferreiro are more side characters but they have their own part to play within the "real world setting" amongst the war and fear of Captain Vidal.

The standout role though comes from Doug Jones in two roles... as the Faun, and also as the evil Pale Man.
Jones is barely seen under his makeup and prosthetics but his acting and, what is basically a mime act in both roles, are possibly the finest pieces of physical acting I've yet to see in a film.


There's little to no action exactly. More based around the puppetry and occasional CG that backs up the events around Ofelia.
But the sheer atmosphere of every set and set piece makes for highly entertaining viewing.
When the little hits of "action" do occur though, they're well pieced together in choreography and style and add more to the story as they're there for a reason, rather than just action for the sake of it.
The film is really more about story, atmosphere and character than just explosions and war.
One thing I will say though, is that the film doesn't shy away from gore and guts. Always a good thing especially when used to enhance the scene.
---
All in all, a modern classic and I can almost guarantee will reach ranks of actual Classic not far from now.
Incredible storytelling, visually beautiful and "engaging" just doesn't sum up the character writing at all.
One of the best I've seen.

My rating: 101%





For some reason all of the spaces between my paragraphs won't appear. The forum keeps bunching the writing together.,



Pan's Labyrinth, a hauntingly beautiful and fantastic movie. Completely agree with this review. Nice job Rodent!

__________________
Here, if you have a milkshake, and I have a milkshake, and I have a straw. There it is, that's a straw, you see? You watching?. And my straw reaches acroooooooss the room, and starts to drink your milkshake... I... drink... your... milkshake!
-Daniel, There Will Be Blood



AHAHA!!! Managed to fix the problem... should be easier to read now

Cheers guys! Took me a while to appreciate the film but it's awesome stuff.



I thought it was great when I saw at the movies. That was back in 2006, though, I guess.



The first time I watched it I couldn't get into it...

I gave it a second chance though about two weeks ago and fell in love. It's just an excellent piece of filmmaking all round, can't believe I didn't watch all the way through first time.



Miss Vicky's Loyal and Willing Slave
The first time I watched it I couldn't get into it...

I gave it a second chance though about two weeks ago and fell in love. It's just an excellent piece of filmmaking all round, can't believe I didn't watch all the way through first time.
I'm kind of in the opposite boat. When I originally watched it at the cinema I absolutely loved it. However when I revisited it earlier this year for my new top 100 list (which now has an ETA of April 2016!) I still thought it was an incredible piece of filmmaking but struggled to form the same connection as previously. Hopefully I just didn't catch it in the right mood, and when I rewatch it (which I will fairly soon) it goes back to hitting the high notes it did originally.



[center]Review #204, Movie #274
Chopper




Year Of Release
2000

Director
Andrew Dominik

Producer
Michele Bennett

Writer
Mark Chopper Read, Andrew Dominik

Cast
Eric Bana, Vince Colosimo, Simon Lyndon, Kate Beahan, David Field

Notes
Eric Bana's debut film propelled him to stardom.

Highly recommended.

My Rating: 93%
I was a fan of his long before this movie, he had his own show here in Australia
Nice review, He was fab in this movie
__________________
Health is the greatest gift, contentment the greatest wealth, faithfulness the best relationship.
Buddha



My first Uwe Boll review...
Review #206, Movie #276
House Of The Dead


Year Of Release
2003

Director
Uwe Boll
Producer
Uwe Boll, Wolfgang Herold, Shawn Williamson

Writer
Mark A Altman, Dan Bates

Cast
Jonathan Cherry, Ona Grauer, Enuka Okuma, Tyrone Leitso, Will Sanderson, Clint Howard, Jürgen Prochnow, Ellie Cornell, Michael Ecklund

Notes
Based on the SEGA videogame of the same name, House Of The Dead shares little resemblance to the arcade blockbuster except for two characters who are played by actors that actually appear near the bottom end of the casting credits.
It also managed to reach the Top 100 of the worst films of the 2000s on Rotten Tomatoes.
The film is also billed as an action comedy horror yet contains no comedy, and no horror.
There was a Director's Cut of the film released as well that was marketed as "The Funny Version" yet this too was met with distain from audiences and critics. This version had bloopers, mistakes and outtakes that would normally be found in DVD Extras, but were actually re-edited back into the film.

---
Seet just before the original game, a bunch of 20-somethings head out to an Island for a rave party with another larger group of 20-somethings... much to the disapproving eye of a local boat Captain called Kirk (yes, really).
While there they realise that the stories told by the Captain and his First Mate were true...
... that the island is inhabited by an inhuman population and the group are thrown into a fight for survival.
Lol!

Ok...

Uwe Boll... one of the worst directors in living memory brings us a wooden cast, a clunky story, a pathetic screenplay and what has to be the most non-scary horror I have ever witnessed next to Alien Vs Predator and A Nightmare On Elm Street Remake.
This film however takes the honours of being possibly the worst of the worst within the genre it's based in.

What we're treated to at the start of the film is a 2 minute voiceover/narrative that actually tells us the destinies of the young adults we're looking at on screen.
So that's the tension and exposition done with before the credits have even run.


Then we're taken on a journey with this group that is filled with gratuitous nudity and explanatory dialogue scenes involving video footage shot by one of the group.
There's also constant music going on... the kind you would find in a TV Movie.

The dialogue is also incredibly cringe worthy... imagine the scene inside the house on the island... the group are watching the camera footage and our man is unemotionally explaining:
"Everyone was partying and these things came and they attacked the rave and started killing everybody. Those of us that could get away, did. These things just kept coming though, and killing and killing and killing... then you guys showed up and I thought you were more of them"
"Them? Who the hell is Them?"
"Who? What you should be asking is What"
Award winning writing right there.
Which is about as far as it gets with the more highly strung scenes really. Everything else is, quite literally, people running and screaming directly at the camera as they get killed to death by some bloke wearing bad makeup and prosthetics.

It's also not even funny. The film was labelled as unintentionally funny in some online reviews. Sadly though, I failed to even see this during the running time. There are no laughs. At all. Unintentional or not.


Which brings me to the acting.
I've never heard of a single person in this film. Not one.
So it's kinda hard to pick one out to talk about but rest assured, everyone on board is wooden, emotionless (apart from screaming) and seem to be having a hard time delivering their lines for some reason.
It's as though they've been given the script for that scene just as they've walked on the set that afternoon.


The effects too are below substandard. Fake axes that look like fake axes, zero charisma within the action scenes and the more bloody scenes look like they've had matt-finish paint thrown on them.
The choreography is also below substandard. I had absolutely no thrill watching.


---
Not much more I can say really.
All in all... definitely one of the worst films I've ever seen.
I've seen a couple of his films in the past but Uwe Boll has managed to exceed my expectations with this one.
Also, at least Paul WS Anderson managed to get some percentage points out of me for the films of his I've reviewed.
My rating: 0%




Bright light. Bright light. Uh oh.
C'mon! You know you've seen Clint Howard in all of his brother Ron's movies, and Jürgen Prochnow in lots, including Das Boot, Dune, etc. I like that you call the effects and the choreography sub-substandard. I guess I'll have to check this out because if it's that bad, it must be great!


Clint in the middle and Jürgen on the right
__________________
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. - John Wooden
My IMDb page



Why is Clint Howard in such a pile?

Surely he could have hung off his Brother's coattails and got a better pay check.

Not seen Dune or Das Boot for aaaages though, I just can't remember Prochnow.

But yeah, the whole film is sub-sub-substandard... seriously pathetic film.