The Personal Recommendation Hall of Fame V: Comedy Edition

Tools    





I just finished watching Zero Effect (1998). Directed by Jake Kasdan, the film stars Bill Pullman as a Sherlock Holmes type of detective named Daryl Zero who is hired to investigate a case involving. Ben Stiller plays his assistant and the supporting cast includes Ryan O'Neal and Kim Dickens. I thought Pullman did a good job. Stiller was alright and Dickens was fine too, but both have been better elsewhere. I think they could have done more with O'Neal though. The story was okay, but could have been more interesting. I didn't find the film very funny though. I still liked it though. This was Jake Kasdan's first film and I have now seen 7 of the 8 films he has directed. I would rank this 5th in his filmography out of what I have seen. Not one of his best, but not bad at all.
I really love The Zero Effect. "When you go looking for one specific thing, your odds of finding it are very low. Because of all the things in the world, you are only looking for one of them. But if you go looking for anything, your odds are much better. Because of all the things in the world, you're bound to find some of them."

I also thought that it nailed the ending in a way I did not expect.



Wrong



Had never heard of this before. First impressions were that there wasn't much of a budget, which is fine, and that it had a Sci-Fi vibe, which is also fine.

This is an amusing movie that could grow on me if I watched it again, not laugh out loud funny, but humorous. It's just weird all the way through and I couldn't settle in. I kept waiting for everyone to turn into aliens but nothing like that ever happens. Every single character is odd. Individually it's funny, but when it's everybody it just becomes weird. It constantly rains in an office and there's never an explanation or even an acknowledgment of it. There's a lot of stuff like that. It's a certain style but I don't know what you'd call it. The closest example I can think of is Being John Malkovich but this movie is not nearly as good. It was an easy watch and I did enjoy it.




I forgot the opening line.
I know that I've watched Wrong but most of it has evaporated from my memory.
__________________
Remember - everything has an ending except hope, and sausages - they have two.
We miss you Takoma

Latest Review : Le Circle Rouge (1970)



I forgot the opening line.


The Hospital - 1971

Directed by Arthur Hiller

Written by Paddy Chayefsky

Starring George C. Scott, Diana Rigg
& Barnard Hughes

The Hospital feels very real, leaning quite heavily on satire but doing so in a way that makes it easy to believe what you're watching is what would really happen in a modern-day hospital - aside from a certain revelation towards the end of the film when things devolve into a bit of a farcical situation. It's something you'd very much expect from screenwriter Paddy Chayefsky, who won one of his three Oscars for this film (the other two were for writing the screenplays for Network and Marty - two really great films.) Chayefsky was very much a dramatist who took inspiration from the lives of ordinary people, or the workings of institutions such as hospitals, the media and scientific entities. His naturalistic style has often given what he writes a veneer of truthfulness and relatability. In The Hospital we also get a good dose of real medical jargon to complete the picture of being in a real place.

The film begins with some narration from Paddy Chayefsky himself, and he tells us the story of Guernsey, a man who is admitted to hospital with chest pains and who has been misdiagnosed by the nursing home doctor - he has emphysema but they think he has angina, and this mistake is compounded when he's given the wrong treatment which puts him into a coma and then kills him. The doctor who was treating him at the hospital, and helped get things wrong, is now happy, because a bed has been freed, and he has a place to have comfortable sex with a nurse he's been seeing. From the unnecessary death to the callousness of this doctor who sees someone dying as a bonus for his own sexual gratification really made me angry - and the credits roll over a still with the doctor and nurse frolicking in the bed naked, so that anger had an image to help it ruminate and grow. There's an immediate payoff after the credits, and that helps get the main plot rolling...

This doctor, Schaefer, is found dead the next morning by a nurse, still in the same bed he was having sex in the night before - hooked up to an I.V. It seems a nurse came by and thought he was a patient, quietly sedating him and putting a drip in his arm. The hospital's chief of medicine Dr. Herbert Bock (George C. Scott) is called in. Bock is a doctor who is depressed and estranged from his wife, son and daughter - a man contemplating suicide and completely lost. He goes on to meet the daughter of one of the patients in the hospital, Barbara Drummond (Diana Rigg) a free-spirited spiritual searcher who reawakens some lost sexual spark from inside of him, and as such he falls in love with her. Her father is a patient who shares a room with the bed Guernsey was assigned to, and is another victim of medical malpractice - but the doctor who initially treated him has been found in the Emergency Department, dead of a heart attack. As further operations are botched and a nurse dies, we see that someone is roaming the hospital corridors interfering and playing a hand in these events.

So, obviously what happens in this film isn't completely down to bureaucratic bungling and medical malpractice - although I would have liked it even more if it had of been. The film does really try to have it's cake and eat it too however, for when we learn of who is responsible we also find out that this person allowed their victims the chance of being saved if the hospital was working as it should be. The 'killer roaming the corridors' part of the film is a slight intrusion into that whole reality-infused atmosphere I enjoyed so much in this film - an atmosphere which still manages to be maintained for the most part. Barbara's father, played by Barnard Hughes, has copped the brunt of mismanagement by coming in healthy for a check-up, being persuaded to undergo an unnecessary procedure, and ending up in a coma - and the irony isn't lost on Dr. Bock. One of the doctors who operated on him, Welbeck (Richard Dysart) did so while under the influence, and for that Bock wants him put in front of an investigative committee. The killer lurking the hospital corridors might make it so that doesn't need to happen at all.

George C. Scott is great in this - a powerful presence who still manages to convince us of the turmoil that is going on inside of him. Scott was nominated for an Oscar for this performance, following on from the one he won the previous year for his role in Patton (and which he refused to accept - returning the statuette to the Academy.) He's absolutely believable, and manages to maintain the kind of distance most doctors, who believe themselves to be superior to the rest, try to maintain from other people - but at the same time he needs real intimate contact so badly that the walls tremble and shake. Under pressure as Head of Medicine in a hospital that seems to be falling apart gives him a permanent scowl, stiff body movements and overly officious bearing which Diana Rigg needs to break down. Scott steals all of our attention in this, and it's his Dr. Bock that will remain after all the other characters in the film have faded as time goes by after seeing The Hospital.

The film was directed by Arthur Hiller, one of those directors who made all manner of films in differing genres and styles - but mainly leaned towards straight comedy in the latter half of his career. I saw The In-Laws for the first time not so long ago and loved that, and have always had a soft spot for Silver Streak. He was nominated for an Oscar only the one time, after directing Love Story, which was released in 1970 - a film that has been derided by many for it's soppiness, and that's the reason I've yet to see it. He returned to the pairing of Gene Wilder and Richard Pryor, helming See No Evil, Hear No Evil, but this time much of the magic had long departed, and all parties were following a much doctored script with few laughs in it. Like George C. Scott, he was going through a great period here after his Oscar nomination and a hit film. He seems to have directed a few Neil Simon films and mainly stuck to comedies, but this film has a much different tone to much of that work, being serious satire with sociological comments. He had an ability to adapt himself to what screenplays wanted, but ended on a sad note, directing quite a few films that were far beneath him at the end of his career.

The film has virtually no score (just music for it's opening and closing credits) and it's director of photography was Victor J. Kemper, who was a very frequent Arthur Hiller collaborator. Kemper's most famous work was done on Dog Day Afternoon, and he was also cinematographer on Clue, And Justice For All and National Lampoon's Vacation. Filming was done in a newly built psychiatric wing of the real Metropolitan Hospital in New York - completing that completely real feel the film has - a rare chance to film in a location that completely corresponds to what the film is trying to be without dislocating or interrupting real doctors and patients. Added to the realistic dialogue, performances and look of the cast it paints a very believable portrait of a bustling hospital in a busy city. That reality is impinged on slightly when we find out what is really going on, but by then the film is nearly over anyway. I'm not sure how popular it was in it's day, but it did receive positive reviews from the critics. It's a film I had never heard of before encountering it.

It's a wryly clever comedy, but not the kind of movie that has you in stitches due to comedic things happening, but more in a sense of "that'd be right" condemnation of real bureaucracies and medical establishments. I may have had a laugh here and there, but for the most part it's actually quite a serious film - even more serious than many films that aren't comedies. But due to it's satirical nature it definitely is a comedy - just one of a different sort. As Dr. Bock continually notes that people are coming to a place that is meant to heal them and for the most part they get more sick or even die when they do. One has to note though, that this isn't a blanket repudiation thrown over all doctors and hospitals and the work they do - saving lives and actually healing people. It's more a case of how wrong-headed they seem when you get caught up in the way they're managed - with nurses and doctors holed up in meetings, filling out forms and walking around while only spending a small percentage of their time examining patients and making a diagnosis.

There's a whole other segment of the film dealing with a tenement that is about to be demolished to make way for a new wing of the hospital, with residents protesting about being evicted and a Dr. Sundstrom (Stephen Elliott) dealing with the fallout. This basically has no impact on the rest of the plot so it seems to me to be something really extraneous to the whole story and an uninteresting sideshow to everything else that is going on - nothing too dramatic happens, nothing is resolved except for Dr. Sundstrom deciding to quit (and changing his mind around 90 seconds later.) This all reminded me a whole lot of Lindsay Anderson film Britannia Hospital, which came out in 1982 - a film that also had sociological problems in it's sights, but one that fell short despite being exceedingly weird with an interesting cast. It was as weird as The Hospital is serious and real. But both films featured a mob and riot that amounts to very little in the end. It always comes down to characters, and where they end up.

I thought that perhaps Dr. Bock fell in love with Barbara a little suddenly, but perhaps we can put that down to her curing his impotency and alleviating his depression - and the fact that this is a film and even though it's a very grounded one it doesn't have to be dictated to by what usually happens. The morning after, she's trying to get him to leave the hospital and follow her and her father into the Mexican wilderness - despite the fact they've known each other for only a few hours. This creates something of a love triangle featuring Barbara, Dr. Bock and the hospital itself. Dr. Bock's sense of duty is strong, but he's also fed up with how dysfunctional everything is - and it's this dysfunction (not only in the hospital, but everywhere) that fed his depression. He's a good man, and if he leaves it will only drain more good sense from an already unstable institution - but if that same institution is poisoning him then it would make sense to leave it all behind before it really does kill him. It's an interesting dilemma to have for such a well-written character that is being performed so well. (The Oscar went to Gene Hackman for his performance in The French Connection in the end.)

Overall, I thought this was a really good film, although there has been a slight deduction made due to it's sudden (kind of crazy) change in tone and superfluous 'protest' segment (it captures and says something sociologically, but doesn't impact our plot - it kind of just hangs out there.) I just really enjoyed the show put on by George C. Scott a whole lot, and especially loved the parts of Chayefsky's screenplay that really delved deep into the irony that many health systems have built into them in a very realistic way. The whole "he came here to be healthier and now he's in a coma" aspect to a dysfunctional hospital, with unnecessary procedures being pushed on patients so specialists can make more money, is something I see a lot of these days. People get swept up into "care plans" that send you to physiotherapists, psychologists, therapists, acupuncture...etc etc so these people can make a lot of money and their industry can employ more and make money - when you have no really big issue for the physiotherapist to take care of, or no real emotional urgency for a psychologist to unravel, nothing much wrong, but you get referred anyway. In the meantime, the poor unprofitable kid with sepsis has to wait. No beds. No doctors. In over 50 years, not much has changed.




"The Greasy Strangler" - (2016)




The film started out grabbing me, even though the son looked like a mangy Tootsie. Vaudevillistic and over the top - Cool. Do love absurdity and this definitely had it. With that being said it didn't really evolve past the aforementioned assessment. Kind of evolved into a lessor version of a Farrelly Bros output. Yes, it is tacky but very hit and miss for myself.



Interesting, and thanks for the rec.. Never would have looked this up for myself.










A while back a bunch of us all watched The Greasy Strangler at the same time. It's certainly . . . something.

EDIT: I don't mean that as an insult. I know some people find it overlong and a bit one-note, while some others find it very funny. It's just that kind of distinct film that can really get a range of reactions.



I saw The Greasy Strangler, not bad but I was a little disappointed. Been wanting to see The Hospital due to it's rep, had no clue that it was comedy in any way.



I've been interested in seeing The Hospital (1971)...and I would've watched it if I didn't have an aversion to movies set in hospitals...and well you know, it is called The Hospital



I forgot the opening line.
Just watched The Greasy Strangler because it looked like lots of fun, and it had it's moments. I think 93 minutes for a film like that is far too long, and 20 or so should have been lopped. That score drove me nuts in the end. Ba ba ba ba ba ba-ba. Ba ba ba ba ba be-beh. Just on a loop for the whole film.



What We Do in the Shadows



This is a movie I had heard of. I looked it up once thinking it was horror and I dismissed it when I saw that it was comedy. My friends here at the forum have been better than me at choosing what I watch for as long as I've been here.

It's a mockumentary about four vampires who live together in a house in New Zealand. They tell and show us their history and day to day lives. For a movie with that description I thought this was practically flawless. It is entertaining and funny for every one of it's 85 minutes. I can't think of a scene or joke that didn't work. Everything about it is clever and the cast is extremely likable. I would definitely recommend and watch again. Another great pick for me-thanks!

+



What We Do In The Shadows is hilarious and a lot of fun. It's a 9/10 from me. There is also a tv show based on the film.



What We Do In The Shadows is hilarious and a lot of fun. It's a 9/10 from me. There is also a tv show based on the film.
The TV show is pretty great. Not worth comparing, because they are different beasts, but love 'em both!



Women will be your undoing, Pépé






Drop Dead Gorgeous (1999)

Amber Atkins: My mom never hid the fact that my dad chose his career over us. What was it, she always said?
Loretta: Once a carnie, always a carnie.
Amber Atkins: Mom still cries every time she sees a tilt-a-whirl or a fat lady in a tube top.

Candy Striper: Hello Miss Sad Pants and her friend, Serious Sally! How about a nice cool mint to help turn those frowns upside down?
Loretta: Do you think a nice cool mint would help if I shoved your head up your ass?

Set in a mockumentary format, Writer Lona Williams, a former small-town Beauty Pageant contestant, pokes fun at the whole process with an irreverent comedic style reminiscent of National Lampoon, which I am a fan, was quite hilarious for me. Williams also plays a silent role as the grave, bespectacled, and only woman Judge of the Pageant.
The other two are a local pervert and a hefty Micheal McShane with a "slow-witted" -- aw f@ckit, a retard son (Will Sasso). Because nothing is sacred, it's sort of counter-productive to apply "correct dialogue" to the humor of this film.

Topping the bill of the competition is the wealthy family of the town, Kirstie Alley as Gladys Leeman orchestrates the important winner, her daughter, Denise Richards as Rebecca 'Becky' Ann Leeman.
Her main (still alive) competition is a local girl, Kirsten Dunst, as Amber Atkins, who tap dances and applies makeup at the morgue. With a beer-drinking Trailer Mom, Ellen Barkin as Annette Atkins, and a highlight, as Barkin's best friend and inappropriate role model for Dunst, Allison Janney as Loretta.
Supporting them with equal dark comedic humor in a Teenage Beauty Pageant where any and all competition wide up dead includes the hospitalized, heavily medicated winner from the previous year, Brittany Murphy, with great comedic effect. Playing Kristie Alley's lackey with her usual brilliance is Mindy Sterling (Frau Farbissina from the Austin Powers series.)

Made before the whole Shock Comedy seriously took off, of which I am not a fan, I consider this a relatively underappreciated comedy that should be held equally with many of the iconic National Lampoon films whose comedic style it shares and does exceedingly well.
__________________
What I actually said to win MovieGal's heart:
- I might not be a real King of Kinkiness, but I make good pancakes
~Mr Minio



Women will be your undoing, Pépé
What We Do in the Shadows is on my Watchlist. Have seen the TV Show which I love. And the more I've seen of Taika Waititi the more I really love his style. I have Boy recommended for me so pretty excited to see that one. So far, Jojo Rabbit is my favorite of his.

Have not seen The Greasy Strangler or heard of it.

The Hospital sounds familiar and very possibly worthwhile seeing.

Wrong is unknown with a strange "off-kilter" that may not work for me.

Zero Effect is also unknown to me.

Four Lions was one I respected more than I enjoyed, but did enjoy all the same.



Women will be your undoing, Pépé
Drop Dead Gorgeous...your review makes me want to watch it. I could see myself liking that one!
If you enjoy National Lampoon Comedies it's definitely in that ballpark.