The Godfather
Directed by Francis Ford Coppola, 1972 Best Picture Winner
I think it's now hard to argue with those who would claim this as one of the best technically made film in film history. And this is one of those cases (although I would say until recently for me personally the Oscars have had a pretty solid track record) where technically the best film won the award. Looking back on 1972 it seems a rather marginal year overall and I can't disagree with this as the winner although I do prefer Play It Again Sam from an enjoyment standpoint. I'd probably have this at two.
It's hard to say if acting or story is the films true centerpiece. I think Coppola had great casting choices which made his movie even stronger. The story was strong but the overall film was stronger due to the performances. I think Al Pacino as Michael Corleone may be the overall standout although Marlon Brando as Vito is the most epic and memorable. I also was rather impressed with James Caan and I forgot about how solid Diane Keaton was in this. Robert Duvall may be the weakest support role but it's not like he was a slouch either.
I like the darkness of the film. When they are in those rooms that don't shed a lot of light on the characters it gives the film a rather gritty, mobster like feel. This makes it seem as if it's the pioneer of the Mob movie genre although others were made before it. My favorite scenes were the hospital scene and I liked how the film was set up with that opening wedding scene.
I've upgraded how I rated this film and there's really no true flaw I can think of although I'll be all ears from people like Miss Vicky who don't care for the film. The first time I saw it I thought it was really overrated but with the second watch there seems to be a lot going for the film. I thought it felt aged the first watch but I no longer feel that way. It's almost three hour runtime could seem torturous to some but I didn't feel it much this go around. Were there lulls? A few, but nothing to make it daunting for me.
If anything this film shows how personal I can make my rating system at times. I will give a film that I enjoyed more a higher rating rather than one that on the surface may be more technically supreme. I feel like film are sometimes about the personal connections you have to a film and that is always an important factor in my ratings.
But getting back to it, glad this was nominated. This is proof that a rewatch can change ones mind on a film and while I wouldn't call it a personal favorite, I certainly liked it more the second go around. The lead contender to win. Problem for me is I love a crapton of what got nominated so this actually may be pretty low on my overall list.
-
Directed by Francis Ford Coppola, 1972 Best Picture Winner
I think it's now hard to argue with those who would claim this as one of the best technically made film in film history. And this is one of those cases (although I would say until recently for me personally the Oscars have had a pretty solid track record) where technically the best film won the award. Looking back on 1972 it seems a rather marginal year overall and I can't disagree with this as the winner although I do prefer Play It Again Sam from an enjoyment standpoint. I'd probably have this at two.
It's hard to say if acting or story is the films true centerpiece. I think Coppola had great casting choices which made his movie even stronger. The story was strong but the overall film was stronger due to the performances. I think Al Pacino as Michael Corleone may be the overall standout although Marlon Brando as Vito is the most epic and memorable. I also was rather impressed with James Caan and I forgot about how solid Diane Keaton was in this. Robert Duvall may be the weakest support role but it's not like he was a slouch either.
I like the darkness of the film. When they are in those rooms that don't shed a lot of light on the characters it gives the film a rather gritty, mobster like feel. This makes it seem as if it's the pioneer of the Mob movie genre although others were made before it. My favorite scenes were the hospital scene and I liked how the film was set up with that opening wedding scene.
I've upgraded how I rated this film and there's really no true flaw I can think of although I'll be all ears from people like Miss Vicky who don't care for the film. The first time I saw it I thought it was really overrated but with the second watch there seems to be a lot going for the film. I thought it felt aged the first watch but I no longer feel that way. It's almost three hour runtime could seem torturous to some but I didn't feel it much this go around. Were there lulls? A few, but nothing to make it daunting for me.
If anything this film shows how personal I can make my rating system at times. I will give a film that I enjoyed more a higher rating rather than one that on the surface may be more technically supreme. I feel like film are sometimes about the personal connections you have to a film and that is always an important factor in my ratings.
But getting back to it, glad this was nominated. This is proof that a rewatch can change ones mind on a film and while I wouldn't call it a personal favorite, I certainly liked it more the second go around. The lead contender to win. Problem for me is I love a crapton of what got nominated so this actually may be pretty low on my overall list.
-