I know I said I would watch it a couple of weeks ago, but I finally got to it last night. I watched
The Hurricane.
Same with the evil detective that frames him, why? We never really get a strong motivation for the detective to do what he did. The detective is a mere shadow and that's too bad as we need him to be fully fleshed out in order to feel Hurricane's pain.
I am OK with the way the detective was portrayed because I like the idea of us not really knowing why he had such a strong dislike for him since he was a boy. Sometimes I don't need anything explained at all. The mystery is sometimes so much better. I think that actually helped to make Carter's pain and frustration stronger. For me, it did, at least.
Well now, I finally know what is Bob Dilan’s song about.
I thought the same thing.
I liked this movie. It is the sort of thing that I enjoy watching. The ONLY problem I had with it was the actor that played Lesra. I found him to be so terribly annoying. I HATED the way he spoke. I couldn't stand the way he'd say his words or his tone of voice. It was almost like he was trying too hard to
act - if that makes any sense at all. Otherwise, I really did like this one. And this is one that I thought my mother would enjoy (which she did). I asked her if she remembered when that happened to him (again, which she did). I then asked if she thought he did it. She said "No. I didn't think he did it. I thought the great majority of people didn't think he did it". Interesting.
I say that because isn't it something how someone could end up in the situation he was in if so many people may have thought differently?
WARNING: spoilers below
One thing that I can't understand is that they say that he was convicted twice. OK. But he was convicted based on false evidence. And not only that, a person can't really say that the white jury convicted him as a reason for why he ended up in prison. If you think about it, if the prosecution is presenting this evidence that the police have gathered together that makes him look guilty, then they will most likely say he is guilty (it isn't like they knew it was false evidence). But, perhaps, the jury would've said differently had they seen the evidence that would've proven that he wasn't there at the time of the shootings.
And I have to say that I really felt bad for the other guy! Glad that he was automatically released, too.
One thing that I can't understand is that they say that he was convicted twice. OK. But he was convicted based on false evidence. And not only that, a person can't really say that the white jury convicted him as a reason for why he ended up in prison. If you think about it, if the prosecution is presenting this evidence that the police have gathered together that makes him look guilty, then they will most likely say he is guilty (it isn't like they knew it was false evidence). But, perhaps, the jury would've said differently had they seen the evidence that would've proven that he wasn't there at the time of the shootings.
And I have to say that I really felt bad for the other guy! Glad that he was automatically released, too.
If I were to rate this, I could easily give it
I still need to watch
Mommy. I will pick that up from the library again next week.