Sexy Cineplexy: Reviews

→ in
Tools    





I'm usually down to watch pretty much anything, but Whoopi and Jim Belushi is about as unappealing an on-screen duo I can think of, so I doubt I'll be watching Homer & Eddie in this lifetime. Maybe if I'm sentenced to Hell I'll give it a chance.

You've got me wanting to re-watch Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter. I watched the whole series last year. Jason Lives is the only one I think of as a genuinely good movie, but most of them were decent. I hated The Final Chapter, though. That moment with Corey Feldman and his stupid bald head was the low point of the series for me. Reading your review, though, I recall several moments that seem amusing in retrospect -- like the fat hitchhiker, or example, and the stuff in the hospital. And I'm pretty sure it featured more nudity than any other movie in the series. Maybe I was just in a bad mood the day I watched it.

Hilarious review of Coneheads. I've always been a bit curious about it, but the Coneheads never seemed that funny to me in the few SNL skits I've seen. Obviously I have to watch it now so I can study your nucleus up close. Unless that will make you feel too naked.

I also saw Independence Day in the theater. One of my favorite movies growing up.

Very happy to see you writing reviews with such regularity again. JayDee gets a few things shoved down his throat and up his bum and suddenly stops posting. It's nice to see that those same ailments don't affect your ability to write entertaining reviews.
__________________



What happened to your Top Ten anyway?
__________________
Movie Reviews | Anime Reviews
Top 100 Action Movie Countdown (2015): List | Thread
"Well, at least your intentions behind the UTTERLY DEVASTATING FAULTS IN YOUR LOGIC are good." - Captain Steel



*shrugs* I have favorites. There's movies that stand out to me more than others, even after watching other things. But I sorta don't like the idea of having a #1 favorite film anymore. You know how with Ink you found flaws in it? That's how I feel with movies, even movies I consider favorites. I will eventually find flaws in them, too.
But I always knew there were those flaws in Ink. It's just been a while since I've seen it.

It's still a useful benchmark to tell what somebody likes. Why not just list the movies you watch the most?



INDEPENDENCE DAY:
RESURGENCE


Directed by Roland Emmerich
Released in 2016
Starring Jeff Goldblum as David Levinson, Liam Hemsworth as Jake Morrison, Maika Monroe as Patricia Whitmore, Brent Spiner as Dr. Brakish Okun, Bill Pullman as President Whitmore, Jessie T. Usher as Dylan Hiller, Angelababy as Rain Lao, William Fichtner as General Adams, Deobia Oparei as Dikembe Umbutu, John Storey as Dr. Isaacs, Sela Ward as President Lanford, Nicolas Wright as Floyd Rosenberg, Judd Hirsch as Julius Levinson, Charlotte Gainsbourg as Catherine Marceaux, Chin Han as Commander Jiang and Vivica A. Fox as Jasmine Hiller



The beauty of the first Independence Day movie is that it's a science fiction movie for everybody, not just science fiction fans. Even though it's unlikely that aliens from outer space are gonna come to our planet in big ships appearing in the sky, and then start to attack us... it's POSSIBLE that they COULD. It's possible that they could. Despite how much we've now seen of outer space, how much we know about it... it's largely all still a mystery to us. Most people believe there ARE aliens out there, and that we're not alone. The chances of it look very likely. We just haven't found the aliens yet. And the possibility that aliens could threaten our existence... that's possible, too.

Unlike ghosts, the spirits of deceased human beings and other animals, aliens might actually exist because we DO have a kind of proof that aliens could exist... ourselves. We know that there are LIVING things in the universe because we, and all the other creatures we exist with, exist! Sooooo... since we know there are living creatures on Earth, there might be living creatures elsewhere in the universe, and if we can be violent creatures, they might be violent creatures, too. They could wipe us out. So, Independence Day wasn't just a science fiction movie. Not on every level, at least. It was a war movie. It was a war movie about one of our greatest fears -- the unknown assassin. The unknown. The threat of our annihilation. The aliens were just another form of death. Independence Day could have been about a deadly cancer or some other disease trying to wipe us out, with the victory being that we defeated it. So that movie, I think, really resonated with us because it gave us death in a unique kind of configuration -- the living creature from another world that wanted to conquer our own world.



And then there's the sequel.... Independence Day: Resurgence.... out twenty years after the original movie, yet they really didn't have to wait that long for this thing. It plays like a bad TV movie sequel to the original. It could have been a 1998 TV movie with a very high budget. It's a total miscalculation and it's absolutely shocking that it even exists. It's the kind of sequel you hear about possibly happening... the director/writer of the original film teases about the plot he has for the sequel in some magazine... it sounds really, really cool... but for some reason, they don't make the movie, and you're disappointed, because you think it sounds like an EPIC film. You're mad at them for not making the movie.

What I found out is... they don't make sequels that sound so good FOR A REASON. And Independence Day: Resurgence is an example of that reason at its finest. Let me say this -- I give mad props to them for doing this movie. Really, I do. This is a bold, ballsy sequel. It's not trying to be like the original movie. It's trying to stay true to the original film, for the most part, I believe. It doesn't repeat stuff, like a lot of other sequels do. It totally evolves from the first film and shows us characters who have aged, who have died, and it shows us new characters, the next generation, because life moves on and new people take over things. It has its heart in the right place.... but as a movie... as the sequel to a cinematic blockbuster... one of the centerpieces of '90s cinema.......... WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?!?!?!



Describing the plot of this movie is complex, confusing and boring. Watching it is even worse. So much happens early on in this movie that... I just didn't really understand what was going on. As I said -- the first Independence Day movie was a science fiction film you could enjoy even if you weren't a science fiction fan. NOT REALLY THE CASE HERE, I felt. The film RELIES on the fact that the 2016 Planet Earth in Independence Day: Resurgence is a TOTALLY DIFFERENT WORLD than the one we know ourselves, which was not at all the case in 1996's Independence Day, which had the world exactly as it was then.

There are moon bases and airplane things that don't even exist. Some of these planes looked paper thin to me, as if Calista Flockhart designed them (gotta do a '90s joke since we're all nostalgic here with this movie today). There are these "tugs" and huge mechanical cannons that are supposed to blast away aliens. In only twenty years, somehow, they've managed to learn so much from the crashed alien UFOs and technology that was recovered in 1996 to the point that they've just... evolved MASSIVELY. Completely gone is the Mad Max wasteland we saw at the end of the first movie. They are now BETTER THAN EVER! In fact, they've even rebuilt the White House and everything. You would think mankind might take a break after the HUGE fight they went through in 1996. A little breather. But NOPE! They have been BUSY, BUSY, BUSY.

And really.... all of that.... somehow can't be forgiven, I feel. This dramatic change in how the planet runs now in this movie.... dramatically changes the feel of the franchise. But let's suppose they could SOMEHOW make that work... they didn't... and why? Because the new characters are sh*t and the old characters are even sh*ttier.

Vivica A. Fox? If you run to the bathroom for a potty break, you might miss her. Hell, you won't be running to the bathroom during this movie because YOU'LL BE ASLEEP! Unless you are a bedwetter (or a theater chair wetter), you won't pee because you'll be asleep. Or, you'll be talking about the film in THE MOFO CHILL CLUB thread, as I was doing during the movie!

Jeff Goldblum? Similar to the way he was in the first movie, but WAY downgraded. His best moments seem to occur with his father, Julius, but they're only together in this movie for like FIVE MINUTES. I'm serious.

Bill Pullman was a JOKE here, but when he does act in the movie, you'll realize right away that he's probably the best thing Independence Day has got going for it, in this movie and in the original movie. I thought that when I rewatched the first film the other day, and I thought that today while watching the sequel. But he's a SHELL of his former self from the original movie. WORSE than a shell, in fact.



And WORST OF ALL?!?! Brent Spiner as the Dr. Okun character, the strange, creepy looking long haired Area 51 scientist from the first movie. He gets a MUCH larger role in this sequel -- AAAAAAND -- HE'S THE NEW GAY GUY! The biggest romance in Independence Day: Resurgence is a gay romance between Dr. Okun and his gay lover, a Dr. Isaacs character, who I believe was also in the first movie. Forget the romance between Liam Hemsworth and Maika Monroe -- that was really nothing -- Dr. Okun and his bearded boy toy are the MAIN romance of the film! 'Cause, see, like, Dr. Okun has been in a coma for 20 years since 1996, and his boyfriend has been taking care of him, and then Okun finally wakes up and immediately sets to grabbing his boyfriend, bending him over the hospital bed and probing him for awhile. You get the picture.

And speaking of pictures -- not a very pretty one! What's happening? Sure, Harvey Fierstein in the original film was no looker, but what a nice little lovable FLAMBOYANT gay he was. When he got engulfed in flames during his death scene, at least the flames matched his personality. HERE, Dr. Okun and his loverboy... Dr. Okun isn't really masculine. His lover kinda was. But they're missing much of Harvey's flamboyance. The flamboyance of Harvey Fierstein has been traded in for two ugly gay guys -- gay Doublemint twins of ugliness. And what a hideous scarf thing Dr. Okun is wearing, too!

ALSO -- how IS IT?! that Dr. Okun had been studying alien technology -- everyone had been studying the crashed alien ship from the 1950's for YEARS in the original film -- and they couldn't build much technology from it -- but suddenly, they know EVERYTHING after 20 years with the new downed alien ships they got to study thanks to the 1996 attack. How does that happen? Thought I have.

Other new characters include the big, burly, black son of an African warlord, called Dikembe Umbutu, who has a lot of experience with killing aliens that crashed on Earth's surface in 1996 and managed to live and roam around for years. There's this new geeky guy -- I don't even know what his name is -- and he's afraid of everything, but he wants to kill aliens like Dikembe does, with the big knives/machete things he's got on his back. At the end of the movie, the geeky guy, I guess, becomes sort of a hero (I think? I was sorta asleep here) and finally Mr. Dikembe turns to him and says, "YOU HAVE THE HEART OF A WARRIOR." I was expecting him to finish with, "But you have the brain of a moron" or something, but it didn't come. NOTHING comes in this movie. Except Dr. Okun and his gay boyfriend.

Probably the MOST annoying new character was this new foreign lady girlfriend for Jeff Goldblum.... totally forgettable. I don't even know what her character name is. All she does is trot around and translate sh*t.

My favorite thing about the sequel? SPOILER WARNING. There's a new alien species from a different world in it (a different world as in A DIFFERENT WORLD -- a different planet -- NOT the '80s TV show with all the black people.)



A FRIENDLY alien. And it looks like a big white testicle with a slit in it. That's all I'll say.

Okay, I'm tired of writing this review. Time to turn a bunch of words in it into big colorful words. It's a very disappointing sequel. One of the worst sequels of all time, I think. And yet at the same time.... I do give it mad props for what it tried to do. But I don't think this is the Independence Day sequel we all really wanted. They should have just NOT made the movie, in all honesty.

The last sequel I saw that was this bad was Basic Instinct 2 in 2006.

Oh and one last thought -- another BIG, BIG, BIG problem I had with this movie -- it takes FOREVER for the aliens to arrive on Earth and attack. And when they DO attack, it seems like it's hardly started. Unlike the first movie, which had such GREAT tension -- a great buildup to the moment when the alien ships finally attack Earth -- ALL OF THAT IS GONE HERE. All of it. Instead, the film focuses on getting to know all the new characters. That takes up the first half hour or so of the movie, and it REALLY, REALLY SUCKED, I thought. It sucked so much I threw a $20 bill at the screen and told it to meet me in the bathroom after the movie.

I felt a chill go down my spine when the aliens actually arrived... but I was let down by their whole show.

One really nice thing about the movie? Something that sort of made up for a lot of the bad -- the alien queen. This movie is the Aliens to the original movie's Alien, but without all of the brilliance.

And as for Will Smith's abscence -- nobody's gonna blame him now for not being in this. It's OBVIOUS why he's not in this. He dodged a career bullet. Even though he's been HIT BY MANY OF THOSE BULLETS ALREADY, he dodged a really big one here.

My rating right now after one viewing:



And that's being nice.



Bill Pullman was a JOKE here, but when he does act in the movie, you'll realize right away that he's probably the best thing Independence Day has got going for it, in this movie and in the original movie. I thought that when I rewatched the first film the other day, and I thought that today while watching the sequel. But he's a SHELL of his former self from the original movie. WORSE than a shell, in fact.
While his voice was very odd sounding to me (did he recently have a stroke, or was he acting and his whole tone was intentional?), he actually looks much, much better than the last thing I saw him in, which was the third season of Torchwood. He looked sort of...melted in that, whereas in this I thought he looked really good for his age, especially after he had a shave.



And that's being nice.
Strangely, I was also going to give this a 2, but I downgraded it to a 1.5 before I was even halfway through my short write up haha.



Didn't realize you had seen the movie already.
I didn't realize how late in the afternoon it was when I was posting in the Chill Club thread. When I made my last post there, the screening we already bought tickets for was starting in exactly one hour. At the time I thought it was still a couple hours away, so I had to quickly get ready and head down to the theatre when the time finally dawned on me haha.

Unlike the regular 2D and 3D theatres here, the IMAX and IMAX 3D one has assigned seating. Since I already had my seat selected when I bought tickets, I didn't have to worry about getting there early. Not that I was going to be in danger of having to sit in a bad seat anyway, because there was hardly anyone else there haha.



Great stuff as usual SC, didn't understand half of it since i haven't seen it but i still laughed quite a lot. At the same time i was surprised how this was basically your problems with it, thought there'd be more obvious jokes not that it needed them.

To your beginning it is my opinion that there is alien life forms out there both less and more advanced than us wherever in the galaxy, but i'm not convinced at all that any aliens have visited Earth.



Master of My Domain
I think eyes just consumed a box of letter-shaped fruit loops thanks to your flamboyant writing style, but the review's actual content was good, as always, even thought it was one huge rant. I knew this would happen. A sequel to a late 90s blockbuster is never a good idea. At least Hollywood didn't choose Armageddon.
__________________
Letterboxd Profile: https://letterboxd.com/GatsbyG/



Sounds like it might be worth watching for the so bad it's good factor. I liked how you mentioned that in the first movie they had the first alien ship since the 50's and as much as they studied it they couldn't gain any technological advancements, which makes sense. But you kind of made it sound like they merely got one new ship after the first movie. There would be tons of wrecked alien technology all over the planet, so it is a bit different. But obviously this is not the kind of movie that is going to explain things and make sense, it's just going to jump to the "action" or whatever the writer found interesting.

Edit: I should also say about the alien technology that it's extremely unrealistic in sci-fi when they need an excuse for a technology leap so they say they find alien technology that advances there own. That was one thing that was actually pretty decent about the first movie. It's like if you give a computer to ancient Romans. They aren't going to be able to look at it and then build their own computers and in twenty years reach the same technology as us. Like the Romans, Earth wouldn't be able to figure out how they aliens make their technology because there are so many stages of progression lacking. Like how do you figure out how a computer works when you don't even know what electricity is? Just because a working computer falls into an ancient civilization doesn't mean they're going to be able to replicate it or understand anything about it. I guess it was a bit different in Independence Day because they had a working alien space ship now as apposed to the broken one they found in the 50's, but yeah, there's still no way they could advance that much that fast.

Man, Hollywood really is dropping the ball this summer aren't they. I mean, they were doing fairly well with the new Star Wars and I forget whatever superhero movies or action movies they were doing. I had the impression last year was a good year for Hollywood, but this year is seeming kinda awful.



Originally Posted by Zotis
Edit: I should also say about the alien technology that it's extremely unrealistic in sci-fi when they need an excuse for a technology leap so they say they find alien technology that advances there own. That was one thing that was actually pretty decent about the first movie. It's like if you give a computer to ancient Romans. They aren't going to be able to look at it and then build their own computers and in twenty years reach the same technology as us. Like the Romans, Earth wouldn't be able to figure out how they aliens make their technology because there are so many stages of progression lacking. Like how do you figure out how a computer works when you don't even know what electricity is? Just because a working computer falls into an ancient civilization doesn't mean they're going to be able to replicate it or understand anything about it. I guess it was a bit different in Independence Day because they had a working alien space ship now as apposed to the broken one they found in the 50's, but yeah, there's still no way they could advance that much that fast.
Did we just forget that Jeff Goldblum HACKS an alien computer in the first movie without even a fundamental understanding of their native programming languages?



Sounds like it might be worth watching for the so bad it's good factor.
Unfortunately it's not. I love those kinds of movies, and this wasn't one of them because the movie is not actually terrible, it's just...not good. The biggest problem with it is that most of the movie is boring, which some people would argue is worse than being bad.



LEATHERFACE:
THE TEXAS CHAINSAW
MASSACRE III


Directed by Jeff Burr
Released in 1990
Starring Kate Hodge as Michelle, Ken Foree as Benny, William Butler as Ryan, Viggo Mortensen as Tex, R.A. Mihailoff as Leatherface, Joe Unger as Tinker, Tom Everett as Alfredo, Miriam Byrd-Nethery as Mama, Jennifer Banko as Leatherface's Daughter, Toni Hudson as Sara and Caroline Williams as Reporter (Stretch)



This is maybe the last of the good Texas Chainsaw Massacre movies, while also being the beginning of the end. Possibly I might revisit the fourth Chainsaw film soon -- that one that stars Matthew McConaughey and Renée Zellweger (before she became Leatherface herself and put on a different face to wear). I don't think very fondly of that movie, though. Nor do I think fondly of the 2003 remake and the others that came after it (though, I remember liking the sequel to the remake - The Beginning). But Leatherface: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre III? It's a decent movie and its heart was in the right place for the most part, but it doesn't completely blow me away.

I remember when I first saw the trailer for the movie, which took me by surprise so much that it kinda scared me. I was a little kid - not even in school yet, but about to be - it was 1989 and I was in a movie theater watching Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child. This trailer came on before the film started and as you can see if you watch it, it starts off like it's going to be a trailer for some other kind of movie. I dunno, it always looks like a fantasy film to me, and I think I even thought that as a kid. But soon the man with his back to ya is revealed to be Leatherface and the chainsaw appears and everything. Took my breath away in the theater. I had no idea a new Texas Chainsaw Massacre movie was coming out. A third one! I had already seen the first two movies and loved them.



A few months later, I remember seeing the end of an ad on TV for the movie announcing it was coming out. Got all excited. Then it came out in theaters and I DIDN'T GET THE CHANCE TO SEE IT. I'm not sure why. School, maybe? It didn't stay in theaters long. In fact, I think it was only at the movie theater for ONE WEEK and then GONE. I couldn't believe it. I can still remember seeing the outdoor marquee of the theater reading "TEXAS CHAINSAW 3." Anyway, I didn't get to see it until, I believe, I ordered it off Pay-Per-View. Pay-Per-View was my whole world when I was six years old. Like Movie Forums is practically my whole world now at 32, Pay-Per-View was my whole world when I was 6.

And I had the soundtrack to this movie on cassette. I need to get a CD of it sometime if I can -- I don't have that cassette anymore, unfortunately. Of course I only really listened to one song off it -- "Leatherface" by Lääz Rockit -- it was a very heavy metal album. Bands like Death Angel, Hurricane, The Wraith, Sacred Reich, Obsession, Mx Machine were all on it -- whoever they are. I also used to have a Leatherface mask and it was based on Leatherface's look from this movie.

But anyway -- THE MOVIE. So in this movie... it's kinda hard to say if this is a direct sequel to the last two movies. I want to SAY IT IS... because Caroline Williams has a brief (and I mean brief!) walk-on role as a reporter... and she's supposed to be Stretch, her character from Texas Chainsaw 2. But what's so different about this movie -- and this is the beginning of a trend that continues and continues with each new sequel/remake -- is that Leatherface now has a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FAMILY. In fact he now has a wheelchair-bound mother who has a voice box speaker thing in her throat, perhaps because she was a smoker (or God knows what - I'll explain later). She's played by Miriam Byrd-Nethery (whatever kinda name that's supposed to be).



And he has a DAUGHTER. A little blonde nameless girl (yet her skeleton doll that she plays with has a name - Molly, I think it was). Apparently Leatherface is now into having sex with his victims before he kills them, forcing them to become impregnated vessels living with the sole purpose of breeding his leatherfaced offspring, kinda like Mad Max: Fury Road villain Immortan Joe, but meaner and nastier because as soon as they're done birthing his child, the mother goes straight into the oven to be prepared for supper. Something like that. It sounds like a praying mantis lifestyle -- use somebody for sex, eat them right afterwards.

So this movie is about a college gal and a college boy driving from California across the country together. As a kid, I used to always believe these two people were brother and sister for some reason. Turns out they're friends and I think ex-lovers or something. The theme of Leatherface is all about how the world is nasty and brutal and you better deal with it or it might just kill you. Michelle, the heroine, is afraid of things -- she accidentally hits an armadillo on the road and can't bring herself to kill the poor injured armadillo with a big rock, so Ryan, her ex-boyfriend/brother takes the big rock and does the job for her. Later, at the end of the movie, Michelle comes full circle and takes a big rock to Leatherface's head in an attempt to kill him. You get the picture. Girl learns how to defend herself after dealing with Leatherface's macabre, perverted family.

It's a movie about survival. The couple stop for gas and meetup with family members of Leatherface who don't have good intentions for them. After a creepy dead-eyed gas station attendant named Alfredo spies on Michelle taking a leak in the filthy ladies room (this was before unisex bathrooms), Viggo Mortensen pops up and shows her boyfriend a map, pointing to a route they should take that'll get them to where they're going faster. Of course, that route is actually THE BAD ROUTE... the route to Leatherface's home... and off they go into the woods that are littered with booby traps, ready to catch them and grab them and contain them until Leatherface shows up with his big chainsaw. Ken Foree of Dawn of the Dead shows up as a survivalist/soldier-on-the-weekends guy and he ends up trying to help Michelle and Ryan out of their predicament, which he is also now in. It's a dark night out in Leatherface's woods. Watch out for the traps. We even meet a girl who's lasted in these woods for an entire week. She seems to be losing her mind, and she's even had to fend for herself by eating a raw rat and berries that taste like someone already ate them and threw them up (so that's where Whole Foods gets them).

Michelle (sans Ryan, who fell into a trap) eventually wanders into Leatherface's house (WHY did she assume the great big house on the hunting grounds she just stumbled into would be owned by innocent, helpful people?) and before you know it, she's being nailed to a chair and listening to Mama Leatherface talk about how she cut out her own sex organs (YEARS BACK), as well as her dead husband's. This is why I'm not sure how Mama Leatherface got the voice box thingy in her throat -- she might have done that on purpose.

By the way -- Ryan (William Butler), the boyfriend character, was really cute, I thought. Never thought that about him before. And I suspect he might be gay, judging by a film in his IMDB credits.



Oooh, but he got all fat later in life -- well, that's okay.

What's my biggest beef about Leatherface: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre III? It's this -- for a movie called Leatherface, it sure doesn't really focus much on him. The first movie introduced Leatherface and made him somewhat of a more shadowy, background character in a way. Who was he? What was his story? You know he's the crazy man running around with the chainsaw, but WHY? The second movie... sort of allowed us to explore more about him. He related with the main character -- Stretch (who, by the way, appears here in Chainsaw 3, if I haven't already mentioned that) -- and felt feelings for her, danced with her, ran his chainsaw up her leg as she seduced him to save her life (don't ask, just see the movie). But in the third movie... Leatherface isn't that interesting anymore. All I really wanted to know was why he was now wearing a leg brace over his pants. Apparently it's because of the accident he suffered at the end of Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 -- but whatever that was shouldn't be such a big deal since Leatherface got a CHAINSAW THROUGH HIS STOMACH AND BACK in that movie -- how did he survive that???) The leg brace over the pants thing just looks like a strange Michael Jackson costume circa the 1987 Bad era.



This is perhaps the most "redneck" of the Leatherface movies. And I don't really have much else to say about that except that it just seems the most "redneck." But I dunno, maybe it isn't? It seems like it is to me. If Captain Spaulding hasn't seen this one already, he might wanna check it out.

Okay, well it's time to wrap this up and colorize my review. I'm getting tired of writing. I hope I've said everything I needed to say. Did you like it? My review, that is.

I give Leatherface: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre III.....



That feels right. I really can't rate it highly, but it definitely doesn't deserve something too low. I was really hoping to like the movie even more by rewatching it... and all I really discovered was.... I appreciate it more, but I don't really love it more. It's a nice effort for a Texas Chainsaw Massacre movie... the last really good one, I'd say, before culture changed and everything went to Hell. It's worth seeing if you're into Leatherface. Or horror movies in general.



IT'S PAT: THE MOVIE

Directed by Adam Bernstein
Written by Quentin Tarantino (part of it)
Released in 1994
Starring Julia Sweeney as Pat Riley, Dave Foley as Chris, Charles Rocket as Kyle Jacobsen, Kathy Griffin as Herself, Julie Hayden as Stacy Jacobsen, Kathy Najimy as Tippy, Arleen Sorkin as Herself, Camille Paglia as Herself and Dean Ween and Gene Ween as Themselves



Many people do not know this, but Pulp Fiction has a bastard sister (or is it a bastard brother?) as far as I'm concerned. An androgynous sibling that has stalked and walked beside it like a creepy fedora and trench coat wearing shadow since 1994. They are fraternal twins -- and I emphasize the word fraternal -- 'cause they are both very, very different, yet in my book, they are absolutely twins. One of them is assured of its own gender in the world, and the other one isn't. One of them knows its place in the world and the other one doesn't. The other one isn't even wanted by most people in the world. One is Pulp, the other is Pat. This review is about Pat. I am going to reveal the secret... that is Pat.

Why are they twins? Most people would never say that they are -- but they ARE. Why? Because both of them arrived in the world in 1994. Both of them featured Julia Sweeney and Kathy Griffin (Harvey Keitel was even supposed to be in It's Pat, but his scene was deleted -- he played a priest, apparently). And weirdest of all -- Quentin Tarantino worked on the It's Pat screenplay. Nobody knows how much he worked on it -- or what he did to it -- but the fact is, HE WORKED ON THE SCREENPLAY, and that's more than what most movies have going for them. This thing was touched by Quentin Tarantino. Yes. He is, in essence, one of its fathers. This is a Quentin Tarantino movie, as far as I'm concerned. He's uncredited as a writer, but that does not matter. He has admitted to working on the script. 'Cause see, he and Julia Sweeney (who plays the mysterious Pat person I'm about to speak about) are friends. Hell, maybe they even dated each other for a time, which would mean that Quentin Tarantino has probably HAD SEX WITH PAT.



It gets crazier -- this is a Saturday Night Live movie. Just like Coneheads, which I recently reviewed. Pat is Pat from the old Saturday Night Live sketches, where Julia Sweeney plays an androgynous person that nobody can guess the sex of. Pat is a chubby, big butted, curly haired, glasses-wearing nerd who happens to be SO OBNOXIOUS. So obnoxious! And just like with the Coneheads, I really haven't seen a lot of Saturday Night Live sketches with Pat. But I have seen It's Pat: The Movie about 90,000 times in my life. And the sad thing is IT JUST KEEPS GETTING BETTER. Like -- I don't like to tell depressed, suicidal gay people, "DON'T WORRY! IT GETS BETTER!" The hell it gets better, coming from my own experiences. Instead, I hand them over a copy of the It's Pat: The Movie DVD, and I tell them -- honestly -- "Watch this a few hundred times - IT GETS BETTER!"

And it does! It really, really does. Last night, I watched It's Pat: The Movie and it was like watching a work of art. This is a sophisticated study of androgyny. The mystery of it. The examination of the appeal of genderless creatures, like David Bowie. What draws us -- fascinates us -- to androgyny? Why do we stare and stalk people whose sex we cannot physically determine when they're wearing clothes? Why are we even fascinated by people like Caitlyn Jenner and transgender folk? Like Charles Rocket, who plays the Kyle character in It's Pat: The Movie, we are mesmerized by genders outside the norm -- because maybe we could be just like them ourselves.

Take the new, popular MoFo, Omnizoa, for example -- is it a man or a woman? Nobody truly knows (though, we all think he's a man, and I think we're right). But listen to Omnizoa speak -- Omni says, "I have no idea what it's like to be male or female. I have never experienced either of them."

How do you really know if you're a man or a woman? Physically, nature imposes a sex on you. You've got a set of genitals down there, whether you like it or not, and you did not choose them. But does that really mean you need to live your life as the gender of the sex that nature imposed upon you? What if you could just live as GENDERLESS? Neither male or female. Is it possible that we ALL are genderless? Maybe we're all both male and female? Why should everybody fixate on one gender to be all the time? Why not dress like a woman sometimes even if you're got a penis? What if it's fun to fool around like that? Why not wear a tuxedo even if you've got a vagina? Why not take your body past the limitations imposed by society and do whatever you want to do? Why not be a woman one day and a man the next? Or how about you just unsubscribe to all of that and simply GO YOUR OWN WAY? Be SOMETHING ELSE!



It's Pat: The Movie is a film that dares to do something outrageous and original like that. You won't believe your eyes as you watch a pair of androgynous freakshows like Pat and Chris fall in love with each other, all while NOBODY in the film has any clue about what sex the two of them are. They throw them an engagement party and hand over gifts in an attempt to find out which will accept the girl gift and which will accept the boy gifts -- these things offer their friends absolutely no answers. Everybody in this movie spends the whole time trying to figure out what sex Pat and Chris actually are -- and you, the viewer, will never truly find out. I still have not found out, although I have my own theories. YES. We KNOW the sexes of the actors playing these characters. Julia Sweeney (Pat) is a woman and Dave Foley (Chris) is a man, but that's the actors! The characters are a MYSTERY SEX.

So, anyway -- this movie. It's the story of an androgynous pest. That's what's so great about it -- it's a film about a genderless person, and the genderless person is absolutely unbearable. You know, nowadays, if they made a film about a genderless person, it would be SO SERIOUS. It would be OFFENSIVE to create a character that's ALTERNATIVE and yet someone most people will despise. They would make Pat nice. They would make Pat all warm and fuzzy and lovable. But the Pat in It's Pat: The Movie is SOMEONE YOU WANNA KILL! And that's what's so great about it. It's a movie about a genderf*ck character that is just THE WORST GENDERF*CK CHARACTER WHO EVER LIVED! He is so obnoxious! He drives people crazy. He lives next door to Kathy Griffin -- who, for some reason, plays herself -- and he treats her like she's his best friend, even though she's FAR FROM IT.

He can't hold a job to save his life. Every three days, he either quits a new job or gets fired. At the beginning of the movie, he's fired from being a postman (or is it postWOMAN?) because he opens up someone's mail and informs somebody that their son wrote them a letter telling them HE'S GAY. "That's life! Accept it and get over it!" Pat explains.

He stalks Kathy Najimy -- you know, that fat witch from Hocus Pocus. The one who rode a vacuum cleaner. She works in a convenience store and she has anxiety attacks every time Pat comes in -- she can't stand him THAT much. In fact, she wants him out so fast that she doesn't even bother making him pay for whatever he buys (usually feminine napkins -- in case Pat's aunt comes to visit). She shoos him out and says, "It's all on me!"

Look at me -- I keep calling Pat "him." Pat does feel like a man to me. His obnoxiousness seems very male -- I don't know hardly any women who have ever been as obnoxious as Pat is. But I guess they do exist, don't they, Miss Vicky?

And like I said, Charles Rocket (an actor who would go on to committing suicide by slicing open his throat with box cutters in 2005) plays Pat's new neighbor, and he becomes TOTALLY obsessed with Pat, to the point that he buys telescopes and things to peep inside Pat's windows. He starts dressing like Pat, he makes a doll that looks like Pat, he tries to seduce Pat one night when he invites Pat over to his apartment. Eventually his wife learns the horrifying truth when she finds her framed wedding photo with Pat's face placed over where her own face is, to make it look like her husband is married to Pat. She packs up and storms out, of course, while Kyle (Rocket's character), in the meantime, steals Pat's laptop diary in an attempt to break the password and read it so he can finally figure out what Pat's sex is.

Pat is also spotted by the band Ween (remember Ween?) who are out driving around in their tour van. Pat had just appeared on a TV show called "America's Creepiest People" (Kyle had filmed Pat doing karaoke at his engagement party and put it on TV) and Ween recognized him, so they asked Pat to film a music video with them. This leads to the obnoxious Pat thinking he's now a major rock star who deserves a recording contract and more gigs with Ween and everything, which horrifies Ween.



Pat steals Kathy Griffin's job as a radio show host called "Love Chat" where she answers people's relationship questions -- she was boring, while Pat, who accidentally gets on the air, answers the questions with a more blunt, obnoxious style ("You wanna kill yourself? DO IT!")

But the heart and soul of the film is Pat's relationship with Chris (Dave Foley), who is another androgynous person that people cannot figure out the sex of. Chris seems very much like a woman, though -- but remember, Chris is played by a man. You don't know for sure. Pat and Chris meet one day at a strip club that Chris works at as a bartender (Pat is in the strip club because he just got a job as a gas man, and he came to read the meter or something.) Anyway, the electricity between Pat and Chris is so intense that they actually shock each other with electricity as they first shake hands. It's love at first sight, especially from the moment when Chris sees Pat bent over a stool, his or her big butt all up in the air.



But the relationship suffers from issues, mainly due to Pat's immaturity and the fact that he or she can't hold a job. They separate and Chris is about to head off to Tibet to go on a year long spiritual quest -- can Pat get back together with Chris in the nick of time? Watch It's Pat: The Movie and find out!

Like I said, this film is the bastard non-binary androgyne of Pulp Fiction. If all of this seems pretty crazy (and it is, believe me), remember: Quentin Tarantino worked on it. Go with it because of that, at least. Dare to venture into the unknown.

I can still remember the first time I heard about this movie. It was 1994 (or maybe 1995?) and I was at Blockbuster Video, looking for something to rent. I saw the box cover for It's Pat: The Movie and -- because it had an androgynous creature on it -- I was mesmerized and fascinated. I actually said out loud, "It's Pat: The Movie? What is this? Who is Pat?" I remember there was an older man walking by me and he laughed at me as I said this. He knew who Pat was and he was secretly fascinated by Pat himself. Or was it herself? Who knows if I actually got laughed at by some man? It very well could have been some woman. You never know if the person next to you that looks like a man... really is a man, you know? It could be a woman. It could be neither.

Watch It's Pat: The Movie and find all about... the mystery... that is PAT.




Really informative review SC, you have me questioning my gender and maybe my existence even . One thing...

Take the new, popular MoFo, Omnizoa, for example -- is it a man or a woman? Nobody truly knows (though, we all think he's a man,
We don't think. We know!

I actually heard about this a few weeks ago one WatchMojo. Completely looks like your sort of film. Great stuff

Also so random that Ween are in this. I went through a Ween phase earlier this year.