Make Your Picks

Citizen Rules...Cinemaesque Chat-n-Review

→ in
Tools    





Lizabeth Scott was actually 33 years old when she filmed The Weapon.
Thanks Mark, I suck at math, no kidding. I will edit my review to make her the correct age.

But... The Thing was always a B-movie creature feature? I don't understand the putdown?
HK hi, I don't know why you and Sci-Fi slob thought I was putting down The Thing? I liked it! I gave it a
.

I tend to be harsher in my critiquing on HoF films and films that are highly acclaimed. I would easily list The Thing in my top 50 sci fi films, maybe even top 25.

I don't think of The Thing as a B budget film only the several close up scenes of horror props felt B budget to me, but not the entire film. Deathrace 2000 is B budget. The Thing is an A list film (IMO). I just don't think Carpenter is the kind of director who polishes every last aspect of his film, the film could have had a few changes that would have made it better. But I'm not knocking it.



Sorry, when I hear B-movie it's usually a putdown. But The Thing is a B-movie. Pretty much all sci-fi and horror is B-material. It's not about budget.




Predestination (2014)

Directors: Michael Spierig, Peter Spierig
Writers: Michael Spierig, Peter Spierig
Cast: Ethan Hawke, Sarah Snook, Noah Taylor
Genre: Sci-Fi Drama
Length: 97 minutes

Premise: A Temporal Agent travels through time to stop criminals before they can act. On his last assignment, Ethan Hawke pursues the Fizzle Bomber who has killed 1000's. While undercover in a bar he meets an unusual person who holds the key to stopping the bomber.

Review: The first five minutes of this film is a slick, fast paced, action sequence with rotating camera shots and ultra quick edits, ala Christopher Nolan style...After that one brief action scene the film settles down into a deep reflective drama that takes place in a bar between two unusual people.

For a bar bet the customer tells the barkeep their amazing life story. Through well crafted flash backs we see this person's life unfold on the screen. We see their unique and painful life, starting as an abandoned child growing up in an orphanage. We see the life changing experiences that alter this persons very being.

This is one of the few films that has held me spell bound. I swear I had to remind myself to breath as all of my attention was deeply focused on this most unusual story.

Ethan Hawke is fine as the barkeep, he keeps the emotional level low which brings focus to
Sarah Snook's fine performance. She won an AACTA Award for Best Lead Actress for this role...and she deserved it. I can't tell you much of the story without revealing the surprising elements, but her performance alone is worth watching.

The third act, at the end of the film departed from the core feeling of the movie. It had more of a Hollywood twisting big ending feel to it. Not a bad ending but it lacked the power that most of the film exhibited.

I give the opening 5 minutes and the last scenes, 3.5 stars. I give the core of the movie a strong 5 stars. Overall my rating is


Attachments
Click image for larger version

Name:	Predestination (2014).jpg
Views:	107
Size:	100.2 KB
ID:	49427  



Sorry, when I hear B-movie it's usually a putdown. But The Thing is a B-movie. Pretty much all sci-fi and horror is B-material. It's not about budget.
I'll try to remember for future reviews that some view the term 'B-movie' as a putdown. I have my own meaning, but if I don't make myself clear then I didn't do a good job at writing.

Personally, I agree B movie is not about a cheap budget (but it often includes low budget films). To me a B movie is a feeling that the film is not trying to be high-brow or great, but is trying to be fun and doesn't take itself serious. DeathRace 2000 is to me a great B movie. I don't find The Thing to be a B budget movie as it seemed to be way more serious than that.

But there is no wrong or right definitions of B movie just our personally definitions.

I will edit my review on The Thing so it can more clearly reflect want I wanted to relay to the reader.



I'm glad you liked Predestination. I liked it a lot, and I thought that you would probably like it too.
In the first few minutes it was a bit graphic and I wondered if I had gotten the same movie you had watched. But then it got good. Oh and my wife liked it too.




Blade Runner (1982)

Director: Ridley Scott
Writers: Hampton Fancher, David Peoples
Cast: Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, Sean Young, Edward James Olmos, Daryl Hannah,William Sanderson, Brion James, Joanna Cassidy, Joe Turkel, M.Emmet Walsh

Genre: Sci-Fi Noir
Length: 117 minutes

Premise: In the polluted, over crowded, rundown city that's Los Angles of the future...a retired Blade Runner is forced back onto the job to hunt down and terminate six replicants who have illegally returned to Earth. The renegade replicants are Nexus 6 models with enhanced strength, agility and speed. After killing 23 people on an off-world colony, they flee to Earth in a stolen space shuttle. They seek to stop their biological clocks from running out. With only a four year life span, their time is short. Replicants are illegal on Earth and so special Blade Runner cops terminate them on sight.

Review: I seen Blade Runner when it first came out in 1982 at my local theater. It played as a matinee for the longest time and I watched the film many times on the big silver screen. Star Wars was still the big rage in sci-fi back in '82. But when Blade Runner came out, it was like nothing I'd seen before. It was so rich visually in details that I felt like I was looking into the not so distant future.

Since Blade Runner first came out, director Ridley Scott has released different cuts/versions of the film. My review is on Blade Runner in general, not on any specific cut. Though myself I prefer the original Theatrical Cut with the noir style voice over narrative and the rising morning sun ending a long dark night.

Blade Runner has always been my favorite sci-fi film every since 1982. I would call it the greatest sci-fi ever made. To me it's a classic, right up there with Lawrence of Arabia and Casablanca.

I really have to thank Ridley Scott for being the driving force behind this movie. Ridley was handed many different scripts and demanded constant rewrites. Each time the script was reworked it got better and more detailed. A very early draft of Blade Runner had almost all the scenes taking place inside a couple of apartment rooms. Ridley told the writer, 'I want to know what's going on outside the window.' He wanted to know how this Blade Runner future looked down the street and in the buildings...he wanted details! Luckily for us Ridley changed writers and got what he wanted: a richly multi layered futuristic world, with everything from architectural design to social logical conditions included in the film. Ridley took his vision and set that to a story line reminiscent of the classic 1940s film noir detective films.

One of the amazing things of this movie is just how much detail in the art direction Ridley packs into each scene. The film went over budget and over schedule as more and more details were added to the buildings and sets. For the viewer this is a very good thing.

Blade Runner is atmosphere! The exterior shots are done at night with lots of smoke and rain. This achieves two things: It gives a dark, dismal feel to the film, showing us a future that is polluted, over crowded and run down. Plus the night shooting with smoke and rain covers the background of the sets making them look much more real, giving a three dimensional quality. Had it been shot in sunlight the set would not have nearly looked as good.

Ridley Scott painstakingly choose each of the actors. Each of them deserve their own write up as all are exceptional good in the film and just as important they're brilliantly cast.



Deckard pulls his gun on a replicant as the never ending rain falls.

Harrison Ford,
Could Deckard be played by anyone other than Ford? Harrison plays this as a burnt out Blade Runner who's growing callous to the brutally of retiring replicants. He's jaded and he just doesn't care anymore. Harrison could have played this as an ultra tough guy, but then he doesn't risk much by engaging the replicants that way. Instead he plays the role with a physical vulnerability. When he encounters a replicant he's in real danger as he can easily be hurt. He's no match for their enhanced strength. Ford isn't hesitant to show that he has a fear of dying. Deckard can look scared and this makes Deckard a fully realized character.


Rachael in the Tyrell building, the composition is set up like an art photo. The lighting is a rich golden monotone.

Sean Young
, This was Sean's first big role in a major film. Some have said she wasn't the best choice. She was inexperienced. Even the casting agent wanted someone else. Ridley took one look at her and said, 'that is Rachael'. Sean Young does seem a bit nervous and uneasy at times...and that's perfect! She is after all a replicant, with implanted memories and she has just learned that she's not human. So her uneasiness is a perfect fit...She certainly looks the part of a femme fatale with her mid 1940s fashions. From the rolled bun hairdo and heavy black eye liner and red lipstick, to her 40's style dress, complete with big shoulder pads.



In one of the most iconic scenes Roy holds a Dove, moments before speaking the moving 'Tears in the Rain' line.

Rutger Hauer
, Roy Batty, what a great choice for the main antagonist. He's smart, cunning, ruthless and yet fragile because he values life. Rutger really packs the charisma into his role. He plays it so richly that we feel for him while we are being repulsed by him at the same time. Most importantly we can understand his pain of having only a few more days left to live.



Gaff, a man of mystery who seems to hold the answers, appears in the shadowy rain.

Edward James Olmos
as Gaff, he doesn't have a big role but it's pivotal. Gaff at times seems to be a mentor to Deckard, other times he seems to be an antagonist. His presences puts Deckard into potential peril. Olmos invited his own street lingo language for the film and spent a lot of time on his characterization and it pays off well.



Beleaguered and scared Pris seeks safe shelter from the cold night.

Daryl Hannah
as Pris, Hannah's wild but fragile character makes us want to give her a warm meal and a place out of the rain. She's needy and alone. She helps us to understand the replicants are 'more than just play things'. We begin to believe that their lives have value too and that perhaps 'retiring' them is wrong. Daryl Hannah does a great job at getting us to care for her the replicant cause.



The replicant Leon takes the Voight-Kampff test to determine if he's human or replicant

Brion James
another great casting choice for the strong but not to smart, Leon Kowalski, He might not have many lines but the lines he speaks are stuff of legends:

Leon: How old am I?

Deckard: [after slugging Leon, to no effect] I dunno

Leon: My birthday is April 10, 2017. How long do I live?

Deckard: Four years.

Leon: More than you! Painful to live in fear, isn't it?



Zhora as seen in a discarded photo discovered by Deckard

Joanna Cassidy
as Zhora, a smaller role but non the less important. Joanna plays Zhora she's tough and unsentimental, which fits her role as a replicant designed for off world assassinations. Her 'retirement' is one of the more coldly brutal scenes shown on the screen.



High in his castle The Tyrell building, Dr Tyrell is waken from sleep

Joe Turkel
as Dr. Eldon Tyrell, he's rather odd looking with that long thin face and those giant glasses. He seems as cold and dispatched as a human could be. His 'father-son' scene with Batty tells us something of this enigmatic man.



J.F. snoozes in his apartment in the old Bradford Building

Willam Sanderson
as J.F. Sebastain, if Dr Tyrell is as cold as ice, then J.F. Is the most caring of the humans. Thanks to the actor we instantly like J.F. We can also relate to him, he's a regular guy who hasn't made the grade. Instead he's stuck in a leaky building on Earth. He's lonely but not sad, he construct friends to keep him company. It's his humanity that ultimately allows Batty to meet his maker Dr Tyrell.


Blade Runner explores what it means to be human and what it means to have compassion for others and what it means to lack that compassion. It does this in a subtle way as the film progresses with Deckard coming out of retirement to hunt down and kill a group of escape replicants. The details that are included in Blade Runner are just amazing, but it's the story arc and the exploration of what humanity is that makes this great.

Rating:



Thanks! That took me forever! I'm sure there's all sorts of grammar mistakes. I try to proof read but it's long. I had hard time finding photos. Some of them I like and some are OK.



Thanks! That took me forever! I'm sure there's all sorts of grammar mistakes. I try to proof read but it's long. I had hard time finding photos. Some of them I like and some are OK.

There were a few minor spelling and grammar mistakes, but I just ignored them. The only picture that you might want to change is the one for Brion James because it's kind of small.

But the bulk of the review is great. It's easy to see how much you love the movie just from reading your review.



Great review Citizen, it really makes me want to rewatch Blade Runner . Overall I'd say I'm not that big a fan of Sci-Fi, but recently I've started to think it just takes a few watches for me to get really into it. I've watched both Blade Runner and 2001 twice and I liked them a lot more on the second watch, I expect that to continue the more I watch them.



Thanks Camo, I hadn't seen Blade Runner in years and was a bit worried that my movie taste had changed so much that I wouldn't still like it, but I found it was even more of a master piece then I would have known way back in the day.

I haven't watched 2001 in at least 20 years, I should really rewatch that one.