Shoutistics
242,353
Total Shouts
44
Last 24 Hours
Leaderboard
The Shoutbox
G.L.O.W.
clearly.
clearly.
Originally Posted by Iroquois
Seriously, though, I have no idea what DD is referring to when he mentions the "best Netflix show".
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7520794/
Seriously, though, I have no idea what DD is referring to when he mentions the "best Netflix show".
Bjork+Kojack=bjorjak
Originally Posted by doubledenim
In the current sports cycle...
In professional golf, a caddie usually makes 10% of the winnings a player takes home that week.
A "subsitute" caddie made an agreement for $4k for a week's duty. His player wins over a $1 mil and under a standard agreement, he would take home over $100k.
Is his initial agreement fair or should the player alter it because he won?
In professional golf, a caddie usually makes 10% of the winnings a player takes home that week.
A "subsitute" caddie made an agreement for $4k for a week's duty. His player wins over a $1 mil and under a standard agreement, he would take home over $100k.
Is his initial agreement fair or should the player alter it because he won?
wowee
thank you Movie Forums for inspiring me to actually watch movies again 
Originally Posted by doubledenim
pfffftttt....
And you only watch movies.
And you only watch movies.
.... and if the player earns nothing the caddie would also have taken home nothing - should the initial agreement then be altered because he lost?
Perhaps the initial agreement should have a clause added to stipulate that it is only legal and binding should the player earn exactly $40k in that week?
Perhaps the initial agreement should have a clause added to stipulate that it is only legal and binding should the player earn exactly $40k in that week?
In the current sports cycle...
In professional golf, a caddie usually makes 10% of the winnings a player takes home that week.
A "subsitute" caddie made an agreement for $4k for a week's duty. His player wins over a $1 mil and under a standard agreement, he would take home over $100k.
Is his initial agreement fair or should the player alter it because he won?
In professional golf, a caddie usually makes 10% of the winnings a player takes home that week.
A "subsitute" caddie made an agreement for $4k for a week's duty. His player wins over a $1 mil and under a standard agreement, he would take home over $100k.
Is his initial agreement fair or should the player alter it because he won?
pfffftttt....
And you only watch movies.
And you only watch movies.
Bojack?