The Shoutbox
Originally Posted by Austruck
Originally Posted by The Rodent
Originally Posted by Iroquois
Watching Star Trek: The Original Series on DVD and I honestly don't know why they digitally remastered it. This is a show that tried to pass off a dog wearing antennae as a strange new life form - improving the special effects seems to be besides the point.
https://monkeyblogmonkeydo.files.wor...stalagtite.jpg
I'll take "Things You Can't Unsee" for $200, Alex.
I'll take "Things you won't find in Munchkin Land" for $400.
Originally Posted by The Rodent
Originally Posted by Iroquois
Watching Star Trek: The Original Series on DVD and I honestly don't know why they digitally remastered it. This is a show that tried to pass off a dog wearing antennae as a strange new life form - improving the special effects seems to be besides the point.
https://monkeyblogmonkeydo.files.wor...stalagtite.jpg
I'll take "Things You Can't Unsee" for $200, Alex.
Originally Posted by The Rodent
Originally Posted by Iroquois
Watching Star Trek: The Original Series on DVD and I honestly don't know why they digitally remastered it. This is a show that tried to pass off a dog wearing antennae as a strange new life form - improving the special effects seems to be besides the point.
https://monkeyblogmonkeydo.files.wor...stalagtite.jpg
Good example.
Originally Posted by Iroquois
Watching Star Trek: The Original Series on DVD and I honestly don't know why they digitally remastered it. This is a show that tried to pass off a dog wearing antennae as a strange new life form - improving the special effects seems to be besides the point.
https://monkeyblogmonkeydo.files.wor...stalagtite.jpg
Watching Star Trek: The Original Series on DVD and I honestly don't know why they digitally remastered it. This is a show that tried to pass off a dog wearing antennae as a strange new life form - improving the special effects seems to be besides the point.
There, much better.
I figure I should at least try - having that gap in my approved reviews would be more than a bit distracting. The problem is that the film isn't bad, but it's just kind of...there. I should see this redone review as a challenge.
You're a review-writing machine as it is.
Only just realised that my post about Sense and Sensibility doesn't qualify as a review. Debating whether or not to attempt a more fleshed-out review.
SC still hasn't voted, by the way.