The Shoutbox
So, just to be clear, when I present you with statistics from a U.S. departmental agency (sourced across thousands of decentralized, individual departments), it can't be trusted, but when Iran violates inspections agreements and asks us to just believe they're complying...you're fine taking that on faith?
The Iran is not stupid enough to do what Qaddafi did in Libya, that's how he got killed. He truly given any type of nuclear/chemical weapons away and that crazy fuc*ed up women Clinton killed the guy and turned Libya into the biggest slave market in the world.
I mean, let's assume the US have solid evidences they didn't stick with the arrangement, that means they can do this attack? I don't know.
If you ask me, they have atomic weapons, obviously, look what would happen if they didn't. US just bombed the second most important man in that country. But I'm not even sure what one thing has to do with the other.
It's not clear to me, I might be slower, I don't know. You signed a agreement to destroy any type of nuclear weapons in Iran. Trump came and said they weren't destroying them so he wasn't going to stick with the arrangement. Iran's say they are sticking with the arrangement and say: independent agencies can come and inspect. Then the Israely president showed some picture no one understood what the hell they were and that constitutes a evidence?
You can't prove a negative. But we do know they've violated the terms of the agreement and inspections, repeatedly, which there's little reason to do if they're honoring it. Seems pretty clear to me.
You can just do the same thing twice, you know, like the chemical weapons story.
Originally Posted by Yoda
Originally Posted by JoaoRodrigues
Who said they didn't get rid of the atomic bombs?
Originally Posted by JoaoRodrigues
this one have atomic bombs
But that's me saying, I truly believe he have them, but that's me believing, you need the prove it.
Originally Posted by JoaoRodrigues
I think they invited independent agencies there to do the inspection, did they not?
Nope. And the previous administration repeatedly lied about it:

https://twitter.com/elliosch/status/621353423225679873

https://twitter.com/baseballcrank/st...35054070599680
Just because Israel president showed some non-specified aka #nooneknewwhatthehellthatwas pictures on a board it means they didn't followed the arrangement?
Originally Posted by JoaoRodrigues
Who said they didn't get rid of the atomic bombs?
Originally Posted by JoaoRodrigues
this one have atomic bombs