[quote=Yoda]It's a bit more art than science, but yeah, definitely word count more than paragraphs. I've seen giant paragraph reviews that were significantly more in-depth than ones with nine small paragraphs.

Obviously, for readability, breaking that up is better, but it's not strictly necessary.[/quote]

[quote=ynwtf]lol[/quote]

[quote=Iroquois][quote=Yoda][quote=Iroquois]So that means it's an automatic process now?[/quote]
Technically, no. But there's a tool I built awhile ago that makes it really easy. For example, I just tag reviews I see while browsing normally if they're not tagged already, and it only takes a few seconds per review.[/quote]

I guess that's okay. What's the criteria for that, anything that seems to meet a decent word length? I operated under the assumption that there had to be multiple paragraphs so my recent write-ups didn't extend that far, but if it's a matter of word count...[/quote]

[quote=Yoda]kthx[/quote]

[quote=Yoda]y tho[/quote]

[quote=ash_is_the_gal]do what you want, it's your forum :p[/quote]

[quote=ash_is_the_gal]no!!!!!!!!!![/quote]

[quote=Yoda]Permission to move your completely accurate Pulp Fiction gripe into a thread so I can test some new tech stuff? :D[/quote]

[quote=Yoda][quote=Iroquois]So that means it's an automatic process now?[/quote]
Technically, no. But there's a tool I built awhile ago that makes it really easy. For example, I just tag reviews I see while browsing normally if they're not tagged already, and it only takes a few seconds per review.[/quote]

[quote=Iroquois][quote=John McClane][quote=ash_is_the_gal]for real, how did the guy survive for three years in Amsterdam lol?[/quote]I hear weed makes you smarter. Maybe? ;)[/quote]

Heroin, on the other hand...[/quote]