Shoutistics
242,348
Total Shouts
40
Last 24 Hours
Leaderboard
The Shoutbox
Yeah, I'd been writing reviews for awhile until I realized "oh, you don't have to describe everything." You don't have to mention the acting or the cinematography or anything else if you don't have anything worth saying about it. Your job is to convey interesting thoughts about the film, and that's pretty much it. You don't need a checklist of things to cover.
I think they probably got better than that. They certainly felt better to write.
I think they probably got better than that. They certainly felt better to write.
Originally Posted by doubledenim
What has really struck me, is the style a lot of "media" reviewers seem to be adopting.
A couple of paragraphs, little to no synopsis and I'm left feeling like I missed something. But, they get their point across.
My thoughts on the sysopsis, this day and age of internet machines, people don't need you to describe it. Just the impression that you were left with.
I mean, people got a lot of cat videos to watch...
A couple of paragraphs, little to no synopsis and I'm left feeling like I missed something. But, they get their point across.
My thoughts on the sysopsis, this day and age of internet machines, people don't need you to describe it. Just the impression that you were left with.
I mean, people got a lot of cat videos to watch...
Originally Posted by Iroquois
Originally Posted by doubledenim
@ all the review hand-wringing
I do a good job of being self-deprecating and admitting my weakness. So...
A lot of reviews are the same. People give a plot synopsis and 2 paragraphs later I quit reading.
You may be like me and aren't a good writer.
There is such a saturation of content nowadays you need a angle. There a few people here that can really write with insight. If that's not you, make it make you happy without outside validation.
Also don't forget. A lot of it is popularity and people may not be a fan of you.
I do a good job of being self-deprecating and admitting my weakness. So...
A lot of reviews are the same. People give a plot synopsis and 2 paragraphs later I quit reading.
You may be like me and aren't a good writer.
There is such a saturation of content nowadays you need a angle. There a few people here that can really write with insight. If that's not you, make it make you happy without outside validation.
Also don't forget. A lot of it is popularity and people may not be a fan of you.
I do agree that we don't need so many reviews where the approach effectively amounts to describing the plot bit by bit only with added commentary. Think the last review I read in full on here was an Alien: Covenant that was just several paragraphs of "this bit was so stupid" and that's not exactly insightful or interesting. On a related note, I think we should try to avoid posting unmarked spoilers in negative reviews under the presumption that it doesn't matter what you spoil since you don't want people to watch this movie anyway. That's just bad writing and something I've been trying to improve on of late anyway.
What has really struck me, is the style a lot of "media" reviewers seem to be adopting.
A couple of paragraphs, little to no synopsis and I'm left feeling like I missed something. But, they get their point across.
My thoughts on the sysopsis, this day and age of internet machines, people don't need you to describe it. Just the impression that you were left with.
I mean, people got a lot of cat videos to watch...
Originally Posted by ynwtf
Originally Posted by doubledenim
Originally Posted by ynwtf
Bumblebee tuna
Bumblebee tuna
Still in office. 16 hours so far gah. Hope all you Kats are well and snoozin'.
Bumblebee tuna
Still in office. 16 hours so far gah. Hope all you Kats are well and snoozin'.
Maybe you are going to pour it in Robert's Philodendron. You know how we feel about Robert.
Dude. If you only knew how close you are. Freaky.
Originally Posted by doubledenim
@ all the review hand-wringing
I do a good job of being self-deprecating and admitting my weakness. So...
A lot of reviews are the same. People give a plot synopsis and 2 paragraphs later I quit reading.
You may be like me and aren't a good writer.
There is such a saturation of content nowadays you need a angle. There a few people here that can really write with insight. If that's not you, make it make you happy without outside validation.
Also don't forget. A lot of it is popularity and people may not be a fan of you.
I do a good job of being self-deprecating and admitting my weakness. So...
A lot of reviews are the same. People give a plot synopsis and 2 paragraphs later I quit reading.
You may be like me and aren't a good writer.
There is such a saturation of content nowadays you need a angle. There a few people here that can really write with insight. If that's not you, make it make you happy without outside validation.
Also don't forget. A lot of it is popularity and people may not be a fan of you.
I do agree that we don't need so many reviews where the approach effectively amounts to describing the plot bit by bit only with added commentary. Think the last review I read in full on here was an Alien: Covenant that was just several paragraphs of "this bit was so stupid" and that's not exactly insightful or interesting. On a related note, I think we should try to avoid posting unmarked spoilers in negative reviews under the presumption that it doesn't matter what you spoil since you don't want people to watch this movie anyway. That's just bad writing and something I've been trying to improve on of late anyway.
Originally Posted by doubledenim
Originally Posted by ynwtf
Bumblebee tuna
Bumblebee tuna
Still in office. 16 hours so far gah. Hope all you Kats are well and snoozin'.
Bumblebee tuna
Still in office. 16 hours so far gah. Hope all you Kats are well and snoozin'.
Maybe you are going to pour it in Robert's Philodendron. You know how we feel about Robert.
Dude. If you only knew how close you are. Freaky.
Why cricket and 7thson would think to pick Black and Yellow on the road, against a surging Bay, with all the inner turmoil in the Steel City...
Originally Posted by Camo
The one time i'm not going against them in the pick 'em league they lose (assuming they don't come back)
Thank god though as i briefly considered picking them.
Thank god though as i briefly considered picking them.
Probably a witch or warlock.
Originally Posted by John McClane
BoJ ain’t even a close second to Hardee’s.
What I think is hysterical is they both sell the idea of the perfect biscuit. Come on, I’ve bought enough to know there ain’t no such thing. You lose it just as fast as finding it: it’s elusive.
What I think is hysterical is they both sell the idea of the perfect biscuit. Come on, I’ve bought enough to know there ain’t no such thing. You lose it just as fast as finding it: it’s elusive.
Originally Posted by ynwtf
Bumblebee tuna
Bumblebee tuna
Still in office. 16 hours so far gah. Hope all you Kats are well and snoozin'.
Bumblebee tuna
Still in office. 16 hours so far gah. Hope all you Kats are well and snoozin'.
Maybe you are going to pour it in Robert's Philodendron. You know how we feel about Robert.