[quote=spudracer]And what are you basing your reasoning on?[/quote]

[quote=Yoda]:( Bummer man. Hope you feel better. Don't worry, though -- I've got reason to believe you'll cheer up shortly. :)[/quote]

[quote=spudracer]It's another depressing day..:([/quote]

[quote=Yoda]"Zoomdaba," he exclaimed with great relish.[/quote]

[quote=The Silver Bullet]Alright I admit it!! It was ME!! And the guy is the faded red shirt, it was him you put the dit in the "dit-dit-dit-di-da"!!!!

I'm actually seen a police interogation sketch by Jimeoin based on this entire concept...[/quote]

[quote=Holden Pike]Who put the "ram" in the "ram-a-lang-a-ding-dong"?[/quote]

[quote=The Silver Bullet]It depends. Every animal in the class of mammalia (to which Bears offically belong) has hair. It is a known fact. His not being fuzzy was probably just a plow to make a ridiculous rhyme. For children and the like.[/quote]

[quote=Holden Pike]Fuzzy-Wuzzy was a bear. Fuzzy-Wuzzy had no hair. Fuzzy-Wuzzy wasn't fuzzy, wuz he?[/quote]

[quote=The Silver Bullet]It would depend entirely on the strength of the said Woodcuk's forearms.[/quote]

[quote=Holden Pike]How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?[/quote]

[quote=patti]pleeeeez sirrr, can  i ave some more?

:indifferent:  :P[/quote]