[quote=Allaby]Wait, who are you?[/quote]

[quote=Corax]I always thought it was just one other person posting here...[/quote]

[quote=Allaby]Now I'm confused about which one I am.[/quote]

[quote=Allaby]Amazing![/quote]

[quote=SpelingError]Wow, we all changed our pfps to the same picture at the same exact time. What a coincidence.[/quote]

[quote=Allaby]Is it me or is everyone starting to look alike?[/quote]

[quote=Act III]I also do charity work on the side.[/quote]

[quote=Act III]I pride myself on making the invasion of my privacy completely unrewarding.  

:)[/quote]

[quote=doubledenim][quote=doubledenim][font=century gothic]In other news, Plant Based Reese’s.[/font][/quote]

[font=century gothic]Needs some work. Chocolate forward. Definitely a cost issue, in light of higher price. There are plenty of chocolates out there that would work, taste-wise.[/font][/quote]

[quote=John McClane]yes, the law is usually nuts

[img_size=250]https://thumbs.gfycat.com/AffectionateFragrantEelelephant-max-1mb.gif[/img_size][/quote]

[quote=doubledenim][quote=John McClane][quote=doubledenim][font=century gothic]I read over that stuff a couple times and it still doesn’t make sense.

How the British royal family has any bearing on American law is lost on me.[/font][/quote]

it’s because that part of common law was codified under monarchs/feudal lords, so it has legal standing that’s easy to defend. plus, that particular family is huge, so only 1 grand child need live to see their 80s for Disney to secure a cool 100+ years of control

it’s genius, and i love it[/quote]

[font=century gothic]I get that, but the fact that it’s still viable is nuts. It worked out for Disney’s loopholing, but it’s just as ridiculous that it exists.[/font][/quote]