[quote=Iroquois][quote=grampaglasses]Ok, but that's someone else's opinions. What's yours?[/quote]

It had a good premise, but I didn't much care for the execution. Felt too dragged out and not particularly exciting even when comparing it to its peers, which had fundamentally less fantastic premises. In short, it's a let-down.[/quote]

[quote=The Rodent]Better than Blade Runner ;)[/quote]

[quote=The Sci-Fi Slob][quote=The Rodent]Ha!

Working on my new top 100 and I found 8 films repeated in the list. 16 places taken up.
Means I now have 8 extra spots. Yay![/quote]
More than enough room for Young Guns. :D[/quote]

[quote=The Rodent]Ha!

Working on my new top 100 and I found 8 films repeated in the list. 16 places taken up.
Means I now have 8 extra spots. Yay![/quote]

[quote=grampaglasses]I think the best part of this movie, besides the special effects, would be the 'whodunit' bit to it. Trying to piece together who's a Thing, and when, is interesting.[/quote]

[quote=grampaglasses]Boy when I get on a binge.....watching The Thing (1982) now. Probably the greatest movie to generic name ratio I've ever seen.[/quote]

[quote=The Rodent]Yeah, it's a flashback thing but isn't great.
It ignores continuity.

Avoid the made-for-TV movie [I]Bates Motel[/I] as well. It's more a spinoff using character names and is total garbage.[/quote]

[quote=grampaglasses][quote=The Rodent]The first 3 Psycho movies are good. The 4th is a bit of a mixed bag.[/quote]

The fourth one is the prequel, yes?[/quote]

[quote=The Rodent]The first 3 Psycho movies are good. The 4th is a bit of a mixed bag.[/quote]

[quote=grampaglasses]I also hear Psycho 3 is good as well. What are odds, considering how Hitchcock had no hand in them.[/quote]

[quote=grampaglasses]anyway, on the topic of sequels I watched Psycho II. Surprisingly...pretty decent, actually. It played out more like a drama then a slasher movie though.[/quote]