The Shoutbox
(trying to revive the BSG mania she had to read for months before she watched the show herself....)
BSG in three hours!! Yee-haw!
That sounds like a good bumper sticker, Yoda: "War forces the best of us to match what the worst of us are capable of."

Well, okay, maybe not for MY car...
I wouldn't necessarily say it's unavoidable and I'm also not saying that we shouldn't be prepared. It's just, we [humans] wage war all too well.
Yep. Probably because it forces the best of us to match what the worst of us are capable of, even if only to guard against it.
Well, it all depends on what you view as preventing conflict. I consider it having a force strong enough to deflect attacks from enemies and protect other countries, while some see it as a need for preemptive war.
When I said "preventing conflict in the first place," I wasn't referring to preemptive war. I was saying that, in all likelihood, having such a military discourages some attacks from ever taking place.
I wouldn't necessarily say it's unavoidable and I'm also not saying that we shouldn't be prepared. It's just, we [humans] wage war all too well.
War's unavoidable. Why not be prepared for it?
Originally Posted by Yoda
Oh, I wouldn't say it's cocky; I'd say it's wise. It's not advocating overwhelming force for its own sake; it's advocating it as a means for preventing conflict in the first place.
Well, it all depends on what you view as preventing conflict. I consider it having a force strong enough to deflect attacks from enemies and protect other countries, while some see it as a need for preemptive war.
Carl Sagan was amazingly smart yet, simple.
Oh, I wouldn't say it's cocky; I'd say it's wise. It's not advocating overwhelming force for its own sake; it's advocating it as a meants for preventing conflict in the first place.

In an odd little mobius strip of geopolitical logic, having advanced weaponry may preclude you from having to use it.
The United States is just a bit too cocky.