Acclaimed movies you're intimidated to watch
Are there any movies which have been praised by many and you may even be interested in yourself, but there's something that's held you back from watching them sooner?
For me the biggest one is Sátántangó. I'm going to be perfectly honest, I can't pretend to be interested in it. It's not just the runtime, but the type of film it seems to be as well. A whole movie filled with slow scenes encompassed in long takes? This is sending off huge alarm bells. Now to be fair, I can take a liking to films that do this. I like what I've seen of Tarkovsky's work, especially Stalker and Mirror. Even with Tarkovsky though he just about gets close to the edge sometimes like with Andrei Rublev where I highly commend a scene's artistic value but also don't have the patience of a saint. (I liked that movie too for the record) I would probably feel less scared if it had gotten mixed reviews, so I wouldn't feel like an oddball in case I don't "get" it. In second place is Shoah. Now this movie I actually want to see for reasons other than obligation. World War II and the Holocaust have been covered many times, but this seems like a fascinating and involving coverage of it. The runtime is still a hindrance however, since I often like to see things in one sitting which wouldn't be an easy accomplishment here. Some day though... And finally, the Lord Of The Rings trilogy. This is actually the closest to being watched. They're not quite as ridiculously long (even the director's cuts) and I've definitely seen a few that range between 3-4 hours (I loved Cleopatra). I'd also obviously see one at a time instead of all three at once. The only problem is that I'm not who you could call a fantasy fanatic, so the overwhelmingly glowing reputation they have makes me have to approach them a bit carefully. Just expect some solid pictures and if I'm lucky they end up being something more. |
Anything over 3 hours long. It becomes a massive time sink that for my ADHD addled brain becomes hard to handle. It’s been a major reason why I have avoided Bela Tarr and Lav Diaz so far.
That said, I can do it. I just need a day set aside for it. I plan to watch La Roue this weekend, and that’s 7 hours long. |
Re: Acclaimed movies you're intimidated to watch
I put off watching Jeanne Dielmann for a long time, but mostly because I knew I would want to watch that one all in one interrupted sitting, and it's not always easy to find 4 consecutive hours in any day to devote to movie watching.
There are a few movies that I technically 'want' to see, that I probably won't because of the nature of the some of the content in them. Deep Throat (knowing of Linda Lovelace's recollections of filming this, um, no), Men Behind the Sun (I stay away from most animal cruelty in films, and this one sounds particularly egregious), August Underground series (I think I've outgrown wanting to test my limits with violence in film, and this sounds like it is just exclusively that) |
Originally Posted by Wyldesyde19 (Post 2260561)
I plan to watch La Roue this weekend, and that’s 7 hours long.
This is great, but I think I only saw the four hour version. And it felt long as ****. |
Originally Posted by crumbsroom (Post 2260566)
This is great, but I think I only saw the four hour version. And it felt long as ****.
I may take short intermissions like breaks to avoid that. I’ve been looking forward to watching it for awhile. |
Good idea for a thread, this should be interesting.
For me: there's no films I can think of that 'intimidate' me from watching them. Though I'm not sure how intimidating is being used here? I do have films I won't watch but I wouldn't say I'm intimidated by them. I'll explain: Sátántangó at over 7 hours doesn't grab me. I'm sure it's good but so are 10,000 other movies. For me it's a matter of time usage vs interest in subject matter. Tarkovsky's Mirror, I find his films amazing but challenging. I would like to see Mirror someday. I don't want to watch Andrei Rublev because of the animal cruelty. Though that's not me being intimated by it, it's me objecting to it. Shoah, would fall in the category for me of very interested but daunted by the runtime. So I guess daunted=intimidated? Though I do hope to watch it.
I loved Cleopatra and I'd obviously see one at a time instead of all three at once.
|
Re: Acclaimed movies you're intimidated to watch
Personally:
Andrei Rublev, I know it's a huge classic, but I tend to not love Tarkovsky and it's super long Fanny and Alexander, I kind of like Bergman, but for a reason I always push back watching this absolute classic. Probably the biggest film I've never seen. Most John Cassavetes films, I watched 2 of his films didn't like them so I think I don't understand the appeal |
I broke up Shoah and Satantango into a few viewings when I watched them and this made it easier to finish them. I've done the same for a couple other super long films, like Tie Xi Qu: West of the Tracks and Berlin Alexanderplatz (it's technically a mini series though).
|
Re: Acclaimed movies you're intimidated to watch
While it would be great to watch all of Satantango and Shoah in one go, to be completely overwhelmed by both of them (the insanely comprehensive largeness of one, the ridiculously intimate and observant nature of the the other), it wasn't going to happen. I think I broke both up into at least three viewings. Shoah, actually, probably more than three.
I think watching Shoah all in one go might literally kill you though. So maybe it was for the best. |
As an aside, Stalker and Andrei Rublev are both 10/10 films for me. Jeanne Dielman and The Mirror aren't far behind.
|
Originally Posted by Citizen Rules (Post 2260571)
Do you mean Cleopatra (1963)?
|
Shoah is another one, yes. Forgot about that one. Been on my watch list since 2007 and I still haven’t gotten around to it.
Someday, I’ll start going through all of these much longer films. |
Originally Posted by mattiasflgrtll6 (Post 2260581)
Yes. Elizabeth Taylor is bedazzling in this movie. Not only giving you a good insight to why people were so swept away by Cleopatra's aura and beauty, but shows such raw emotion in her performance it tears your guts out. By far one of the best actors of all time.
|
No, no, no, you misread my post entirely :laugh:
And finally, the Lord Of The Rings trilogy. This is actually the closest to being watched. They're not quite as ridiculously long (even the director's cuts) and I've definitely seen a few [movies] that range between 3-4 hours (I loved Cleopatra). I'd also obviously see one at a time instead of all three at once.
|
This would've been clearer, not that it matters🙂
And finally, the Lord Of The Rings trilogy. This is actually the closest to being watched. They're not quite as ridiculously long (even the director's cuts), I'd also obviously see one at a time instead of all three at once. I've definitely seen a few [movies] that range between 3-4 hours (I loved Cleopatra).
|
Originally Posted by crumbsroom (Post 2260565)
Deep Throat (knowing of Linda Lovelace's recollections of filming this, um, no)
|
Originally Posted by Rockatansky (Post 2260647)
I haven't seen this either (partially for the reasons you cite, partially because I heard it isn't very good), but Gerard Damiano's career merits further exploration. I'm guessing you've heard of The Devil in Miss Jones, starring Georgina Spelvin, probably the best actress in the genre, and I would also recommend For Richer For Poorer, which I think has an even better peformance from her. Vinegar Syndrome put out Skin Flicks (a more downbeat Boogie Nights or Day For Night, although the climax is pretty unpleasant), Memories Within Miss Aggie (a somewhat Bergman inspired psychological horror), Throat: 12 Years After (more episodic but still stylish and well acted), and Let My Puppets Come (haven't seen it yet, but there's no way it isn't worth watching with that premise).
|
Re: Acclaimed movies you're intimidated to watch
Salo. It just seems like even though dark, it will just go too over the top, from what I hear, to the point of exploitation, so I have been hesitant to see it.
|
Re: Acclaimed movies you're intimidated to watch
Deliverance, Midnight Express and Salo. I expect them to be kinda tough to watch.
|
Originally Posted by Flicker (Post 2260657)
Deliverance, Midnight Express and Salo. I expect them to be kinda tough to watch.
Haven't seen "Salo," but the first two are rather mainstream movies. I dunno, it's harder for me to sit through Transformers and youth-lit movies. Deliverance is worth it for Dueling Banjos. Midnight Express is worth it for Georgio Moroder. And that's before we get to the really good (insert inappropriate comment here). |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:50 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums