Movie Forums (http://www.movieforums.com/community/index.php)
-   General Movie Discussion (http://www.movieforums.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Question about the story to Broadcast News (1987). (http://www.movieforums.com/community/showthread.php?t=59858)

ironpony 08-14-19 01:06 AM

Question about the story to Broadcast News (1987).
 
WARNING: "SPOILERS" spoilers below
I don't understand why it was such a big deal that Tom has to shoot his reaction to the woman he was interviewing, after her interview, cause he only had one camera.

The woman was a victim of rape, which is what the interview was about and even she understood that it would make for a more powerful news story.

But why was Jane hugely offended by this? All Tom did was get creative when he only had one camera to work with. She even said it was a breach of ethics for the news. But if this was such a breach of ethics, then why did Tom keep the tape in the office for anyone to view at any time?


When I went to film school, I did an interview for a documentary, and I had only had camera, and I shot all my shots after the interview, reacting to it. Was that bad of me? It's called a filmmaker getting creative when they only have one camera.

So was she overreacting, or no?

Siddon 12-11-19 03:31 PM

She was overreacting during the entire film...it's why we got those scenes of her in hysterics.

Hey Fredrick 12-12-19 06:03 PM

Re: Question about the story to Broadcast News (1987).
 
Reaction shots are pretty SOP. The breach of ethics and what she was objecting to were the fake tears.


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:28 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums