Black Panther smashes box office records
Almost a quarter-billion dollars in North America. It's been tracking high for a long time, but something in the last month until release launched it into the stratosphere. It took on a life of its own. Some good analysis here:
Debuting in 4,020 theaters, Black Panther's per theater average for the three-day weekend was a massive $50,250, the third largest ever. Even more eye-opening, Black Panther's theater count was the smallest among the top fifteen openings of all-time and second only to Furious 7 in the top 25.
https://twitter.com/theblackpanther/...15260657819648 |
Re: Black Panther smashes box office records
Yet another Marvel abomination doing well financially. As long as it continues, we will be getting these cookie-cutter, soulless films every year. I await the death of superhero genre with optimism.
"Unhappy is the land that breeds no hero!" "No, unhappy is the land that needs one." |
Abomination seems strong. While I can see an argument for not liking superhero movies in general and their affects on what has become very much mainstream, I would say that this story at least has a heart. Strip away all the stylized design, and you are left with an honest (simple) story of abandonment and the seduction to fill that emptiness with blame, which I think we can all relate to in one degree or another. Additionally, the story highlights the hypocrisy of idealistic and unrealistic morality, and the potential collateral risks of national isolationism and exceptionalism. These themes fill personal, social, and global considerations that I don't think most superhero flicks bother with. Global, sure, if an alien race attacks the earth but I'm not sure that's on the same level.
Maybe Peter Parker is the next approachable tier, but even he was motivated by his own arguably selfish desire to "be" something special, as a result of... puberty and angst ;) |
Originally Posted by Mr Minio (Post 1870681)
Yet another Marvel abomination doing well financially. As long as it continues, we will be getting these cookie-cutter, soulless films every year. I await the death of superhero genre with optimism.
|
Originally Posted by Mr Minio (Post 1870681)
Yet another Marvel abomination doing well financially. As long as it continues, we will be getting these cookie-cutter, soulless films every year. I await the death of superhero genre with optimism.
"Unhappy is the land that breeds no hero!" "No, unhappy is the land that needs one." |
Re: Black Panther smashes box office records
I also think there's a major lack of appreciation for the artistic talent necessary to produce works of scale, that speak to wide varieties of people across geography and culture. I'm not going to tell you popular = good, or that there's no potential dilution in creating art for a mass audience, but it's not easy, either.
If you create a story that touches a billion people, how do you even begin to measure that against something that touches tens of thousands, but each one more deeply? These are questions beyond my pay grade and, I suspect, everyone else's, too, so that any attempt to answer them is really just a statement of personal preference. |
Originally Posted by I. Rex (Post 1870691)
Enjoying foie gras and enjoying big macs are not mutually exclusive. Life is better when you realize this.
Spaghetti westerns are great entertainment. They're only for manly men and feminine women, though. Marvel fans don't really want to watch a film, but only eat some popcorn and look at trash while doing it. I just decided that. And even if we're narrowing entertainment cinema to just superhero films, Watchmen was a great one (it's DCU, though). I'm generally anti-Marvel, because I heard it's hip, although I secretly enjoyed Guardians of the Galaxy. |
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1870693)
I also think there's a major lack of appreciation for the artistic talent necessary to produce works of scale
2. Talent equals craftsmanship, but... 3. Craftsmanship does not have to equal artistry. I'd rather have a modest painter paint a beautiful flower on 20x20 cm canvas, than the best-selling painter paint a 5x2 m epic battle, that reeks. Of course, it's possible for the latter to paint an epic battle scene that's just as beautiful as the flower. Marvel is not such painter, though.
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1870693)
that speak to wide varieties of people across geography and culture
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1870693)
If you create a story that touches a billion people, how do you even begin to measure that against something that touches tens of thousands.
|
Originally Posted by Mr Minio (Post 1870698)
1. Money does not equal talent.
2. Talent equals craftsmanship, but... 3. Craftsmanship does not have to equal artistry.
Originally Posted by Mr Minio (Post 1870698)
It's just trying to find the golden mean. They're making these films in a way, that they have a mix of genres and tropes, but never really explore anything within these. Films like Guardians of the Galaxy are not abominations, right. They're just extremely, plainly mediocre. There's nothing above the mediocre. They don't take chances. I'd rather make a film one person loves, than a film that a million people thinks was alright.
There is obviously something beautiful about speaking to one person directly and deeply. There is also something beautiful about speaking to many people, which inevitably involves isolating enduring principles that are universal to human experience, so that people with myriad differences can both enjoy the same thing, across time and culture. That's essentially what many blockbuster films do: they speak to us not as individuals, but as a species. |
Re: Black Panther smashes box office records
Superhero films should be for kids only. After all they are originally comic book characters.
|
Re: Black Panther smashes box office records
I suppose comic books may appeal to children disproportionately (though maybe only for developmental reasons), but there's nothing inherent to the combination of stories and images that make them childlike. If there were, you'd have to say the same thing about all cinema.
|
Originally Posted by Mr Minio (Post 1870681)
Yet another Marvel abomination doing well financially. As long as it continues, we will be getting these cookie-cutter, soulless films every year. I await the death of superhero genre with optimism.
"Unhappy is the land that breeds no hero!" "No, unhappy is the land that needs one." |
Originally Posted by ashdoc (Post 1870706)
Superhero films should be for kids only. After all they are originally comic book characters.
|
Originally Posted by Luis (Post 1870711)
Superhero films are for the child inside all of us.
|
Originally Posted by Luis (Post 1870710)
I never understood people boycotting films they don't enjoy Clearly, there's an audience for it, why would you hope to take away other people's enjoyment?
I love little dictators like Mousie and the other fat kid with the bad hair cut who think they can condescend to others and let them know what art they should be watching. I'm glad I live in a country where I get to choose rather than be dictated to. Hallelujah! Looking forward to seeing this. |
I generally agree with you, Yoda, but the contrarian in me has to add some remarks.
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1870701)
Boundless creativity without craftsmanship will produce messy, incoherent films
Originally Posted by Yoda (Post 1870701)
That's essentially what many blockbuster films do: they speak to us not as individuals, but as a species.
“Modern mass culture, aimed at the 'consumer', the civilisation of prosthetics, is crippling people's souls, setting up barriers between man and the crucial questions of his existence, his consciousness of himself as a spiritual being.” But, yeah, as Marker said: “the naive American contemplates the sky; the Russian, or at least that Russian [Tarkovsky], settles in the sky, and contemplates the earth."
Originally Posted by ashdoc (Post 1870706)
Superhero films should be for kids only. After all they are originally comic book characters.
Originally Posted by Luis (Post 1870710)
Clearly, there's an audience for it, why would you hope to take away other people's enjoyment?
Originally Posted by Luis (Post 1870710)
You seem to be very mad about movies you don't care about. Have you tried, i don't know, maybe just not watching them? I think you will be happier.
|
Originally Posted by Mr Minio (Post 1870727)
You clearly didn't get the reference at all. Think of the whole thing in a broader sense. Marvel keeps making these films based on such and such formula, because it works. It brings profit. They milk money off people, who agree to this formula, who do not expect anything else. Now imagine all these people get fed up with it. Marvel panicks. They have to find a new formula, but in order to find it, they have to experiment. Yay! They made a messy, incoherent film (might not be best words, because they already did, in some sense, multiple times, but still...), but it's interesting. It's clumsy. But it's something else. But such revolution is pretty far away, I'm afraid, so don't worry, I will not take away your enjoyment. Yet. :cool:
Originally Posted by Mr Minio (Post 1870727)
Yes. I hardly watch them, and I don't support them. Why shouldn't I watch a film, and express my opinion about it, though?
|
Fair enough.
The quote I used was a rephrasing of Godard saying "I await the end of cinema with optimism.”. |
Yeah, I think we're probably 95% in agreement here: it's mostly just a difference in emphasis or priority. I assume we both agree that both types of films can be valuable in different ways, you just place a (relatively) greater value than I do on more focused films that speak deeply to fewer people. No worries.
I'm not even trying to change people's minds about which is better; just trying to change the way people evaluate them a little. It obviously wouldn't be fair to say that a focused, niche art house film wasn't good because it didn't speak to enough people, so I think the same is true in reverse, with criticizing a blockbuster simply for trying to reach more people (albeit usually on a shallower level). I would no sooner judge either of these by the other's standard than I would expect a political campaign to resemble my personal friendships. Only thing I need to clarify:
Originally Posted by Mr Minio (Post 1870727)
But... great films... or rather great auteurs through their films, speak to us, to every Man inside of us, at the same time addressing "species" problems in a more broader sense. Tarkovsky said:
“Modern mass culture, aimed at the 'consumer', the civilisation of prosthetics, is crippling people's souls, setting up barriers between man and the crucial questions of his existence, his consciousness of himself as a spiritual being.” But, yeah, as Marker said: “the naive American contemplates the sky; the Russian, or at least that Russian [Tarkovsky], settles in the sky, and contemplates the earth." |
Re: Black Panther smashes box office records
How about this:
MOVIES ARE AWESOME! Honestly at this point in my life I would rather watch a movie, regardless of what it is, over doing something I hate like watch the Superbowl or work on a car (no offense to people who like that stuff). 15:17 to Paris, for example, was terrible by my estimation - but I was happy to see it because I love the art of cinema so much that it just doesn't matter. Seeing moving images captured and spliced to other moving images, with audio design put against it... it's f*cking amazing. |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:33 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums