Movie Forums (http://www.movieforums.com/community/index.php)
-   Movie Reviews (http://www.movieforums.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010) (http://www.movieforums.com/community/showthread.php?t=22483)

jrs 04-30-10 09:44 PM

A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
Originally Posted by jrs (Post 617274)
A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)



Let me just start by saying this was the best redux of a franchise I've seen since Batman Begins. Out with the old and in with new as they say. Jackie Earle Haley did a superb job as Freddy Krueger. Sure Robert Englund was great as the title role, but Haley genuinely outshines Englund in every way. The character of Krueger here is more creepy, sick, disgusting and repulsive..the way he should have been in the first place. Bringing new blood into this franchise did wonders, and choosing Jackie as Freddy broke that mold. I agree with Harry at AICN when he said that Haley did to Krueger, what Heath did with the Joker.

The film had nice homages to the original, which I kind of liked. The rest of the cast did a fine job as well. I'm glad they didn't take the usual teeny bopper type route that they usual use with kids in horror films. The climatic scene to the new nightmare film went a totally different direction as well. The final cutscene before the credits though was cool to watch yet expected. Originally when this was announced I had my doubts. But when it was announced who'd play the lead role, images appeared then trailers and clips were shown my expectations grew into pure excitement and impatience. Freddy is back, and he's better (and freakin nastier) than ever !!
.

n3wt 04-30-10 10:00 PM

Re: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
Im so glad this is getting good reviews :yup: Im so hyped for this, great review Jrs :up:

Sexy Celebrity 05-01-10 01:46 AM

Re: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
The new A Nightmare on Elm Street is complete and utter crap.

I am a big fan of the original film - it's one of my favorite movies of all time -- so of course, I'm biased -- however -- to call this movie a great redux in the tradition of Batman Begins is so f***ed up that I'm about to call 911 on jrs.

This movie is nothing but a very ugly, patchworked quilt that a stupid person put together. It's a bad kindergarten assignment -- "Look! It's my Nightmare on Elm Street!"

Everything in this movie has basically been done before, in other movies from the Nightmare on Elm Street series. The way they kill Freddy -- including the weapon AND what the killer of Freddy even says - is pretty much exactly the same way he died in Freddy vs. Jason. The obvious references bleed all the way through. A Nightmare On Elm Street (2010) would be a hemophiliac if it was a person.

The fact that Jackie Earle Haley took over the role of Freddy Krueger really doesn't mean anything -- I do think that Robert Englund would have saved this film, however, the whole movie is such a mess that Englund's departure isn't even noticeable.

But to me, the film was nothing but a big funeral for Freddy Krueger and A Nightmare On Elm Street. This is the real Freddy's Dead (the 1991 movie where Freddy, played by Robert Englund, dies, apparently, for good).

I went to see it out of curiosity and because I love this series -- I warn others that wanna go for the same reasons that it's really not worth the effort in going to see it right away. It's horrible as a remake and as a sequel, however you wanna see it.

But my point isn't to steer you away from the film -- my point is to tell you the filmmakers royally screwed up, in my opinion.

jrs 05-01-10 02:49 AM

Originally Posted by Sexy Celebrity (Post 617331)
to call this movie a great redux in the tradition of Batman Begins....
Nobody said that. I said "the best redux of a franchise I've seen since Batman Begins".

TheUsualSuspect 05-01-10 03:26 AM

I'm with SC on this one, check out my review here.

Sexy Celebrity 05-01-10 03:49 AM

Re: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
Great review by TheUsualSuspect. He was a lot nicer than I was regarding the movie.

Honestly, I see what he's saying by declaring the film better than most remakes out there. I, personally, have not seen all of the remakes (such as Prom Night) and I can find good spots within the new Nightmare movie, things that are enjoyable. However, overall, it's pathetic. It doesn't have much fun and the writing really is godawful. You don't give a damn about the new people who are filling in for characters like Tina and Rod (now named Kris and Jesse).

When compared to the original, I feel that it's deeply sad how phoney and dead-ended the remake is. The remake feels more like one of the sequels instead of the very first film from 1984 -- a bad sequel - a very, very bad sequel.

People cheered and applauded at my theatre when the movie was over. I actually felt deep shame -- I was hoping I wouldn't run into someone I knew. I was that embarrassed about being there. Usually, when I leave a Freddy film - this is the sixth one I've seen in a movie theatre - I feel proud to be there. I love these movies. I will stay until the credits are over.

That was not the case this time. Not at all. I was ready to get out of there once the screen turned black. I feel like an era has ended.

TheUsualSuspect 05-01-10 03:15 PM

Re: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
I think the 80's was the perfect era for the original film. It just felt right to me, this one feels off. It's too 'updated' for my liking.

I agree about the characters, totally useless. So many iconic moments from the original are thrown in for 'fans', but other than the reverse Depp scene, I found them to be pretty pathetic.

Pyro Tramp 05-01-10 05:00 PM

Re: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
Three reviews and i'm pretty sure that I know which 2 i'll agree with.

i.e. those from people with real opinions

Sexy Celebrity 05-01-10 05:05 PM

Originally Posted by TheUsualSuspect (Post 617401)
I agree about the characters, totally useless. So many iconic moments from the original are thrown in for 'fans', but other than the reverse Depp scene, I found them to be pretty pathetic.
Horrendously pathetic. Deathly pale in comparison to how things were handled in the original.

WARNING: "Nightmare on Elm Street" spoilers below
People in my theatre seemed to freak out over Kris' death, which was a remake of Tina's death in the original, where she's slashed and dragged around the walls by Freddy. In the new film, she moves around the whole room quickly, as if on some kind of amusement park ride, then falls down and dies suddenly. In the original, Tina gets dragged slowly, suffers horrendously, cries and cries out for help (missing in the remake) and then FINALLY falls with a big splash of blood.


My favorite thing in the whole remake...

WARNING: "Nightmare On Elm Street" spoilers below
was the laptop that went into sleep mode when Quentin fell asleep in the book store. Ha ha. I laughed. That was the best part. Night, night, computer.

jrs 05-01-10 05:27 PM

Originally Posted by Pyro Tramp (Post 617421)

i.e. those from people with real opinions
As opposed to what??? I wouldn't call my opinion fabricated. :rolleyes:

Pyro Tramp 05-01-10 06:09 PM

Re: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
Not this old cookie. To re-iterate an observation i frequently make, you love near enough every film that gets a wide release. To the point where i can only fathom you're a plant to big up certain films that get negativity almost everywhere. And don't reply to this because i won't.

edit: Ok, i'm willing to hold back on this one not being awful after seeing those links you posted of other reviews but the principle remains.

meatwadsprite 05-01-10 06:40 PM

Re: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
Personally I don't have hope for a critically bashed remake of a critically acclaimed piece of garbage.

jrs 05-01-10 06:53 PM

Originally Posted by Pyro Tramp (Post 617427)
To re-iterate an observation i frequently make, you love near enough every film that gets a wide release.
:rotfl: Not really. Try re-iteraing your so called observation.

Pyro Tramp 05-02-10 06:16 PM

Re: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
I think that would be re-re-iterating.

BadaBing 05-03-10 11:18 PM

Re: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
I'm gonna have to side with jrs on this one. I thought it was a pretty good remake.

The Taxi Driver 05-05-10 12:29 PM

I really wanted to like it and in some sense I did I just felt like the whole film was pointless. Much like the second half of Rob Zombie's Halloween I just felt like I had seen this whole movie before. It was filled with re-done scenes from the original just without any of the buildup. They killed the first few characters way to quickly as if they just did it because it was in the original and not because it helped moved this new story along. Also I keep reading how this isn't gonna be the Freddy we are used to but more dark and serious yet I heard more puns in this new version than I did in the original. Overall it wasn't terrible but it fell short because it tried to differentiate itself from the original but at the same time tried to copy the original in almost every way. I give it between a C+/B-

Pyro Tramp 05-05-10 07:26 PM

Re: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
Awful remake. Did not get on with Jackie, especially when he even delivered identical lines from Watchmen in an identical manner. Showed too much of him too soon. Jackie strained the voice too hard to deliver a sinister or mocking tone and most lines fell very flat for me. I did like how they made him more of a sexual deviant towards the end but sloppy contradictory writing undermined a lot. It wasn't hard to improve on the final twist so can't give much props to that. The film dragged, there wasn't sufficient drive or characters to give a toss about and when plot did develop it was so sloppy and rushed almost missed it- like the kids thinking he was innocent- huh?

For all the technology that could have improved on some of the admittedly ropey effects from the original, it didn't. The wallpaper scene was worse in CGI, for example. Freddy's appearance became routine and unimaginative by the end, he didn't really make much use of the dreamscape to intimidate.

Just below average remake.

The Prestige 05-05-10 09:44 PM

Originally Posted by Pyro Tramp (Post 618212)
Awful remake. Did not get on with Jackie, especially when he even delivered identical lines from Watchmen in an identical manner. Showed too much of him too soon. Jackie strained the voice too hard to deliver a sinister or mocking tone and most lines fell very flat for me. I did like how they made him more of a sexual deviant towards the end but sloppy contradictory writing undermined a lot. It wasn't hard to improve on the final twist so can't give much props to that. The film dragged, there wasn't sufficient drive or characters to give a toss about and when plot did develop it was so sloppy and rushed almost missed it- like the kids thinking he was innocent- huh?

For all the technology that could have improved on some of the admittedly ropey effects from the original, it didn't. The wallpaper scene was worse in CGI, for example. Freddy's appearance became routine and unimaginative by the end, he didn't really make much use of the dreamscape to intimidate.

Just below average remake.


Where did you see it??? Special previews?

Pyro Tramp 05-06-10 05:25 AM

Re: A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)
 
Yeah, i managed to blag a card for E4's Student Slacker Club back in September which gives you free tickets and free beer for a special screening every other month so at Picture House cinemas.

The Prestige 05-06-10 08:34 AM

Ah right nice one. No longer a student, so i guess I wouldnt be eligible for this too?


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:15 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright, ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © Movie Forums